2

Director Remote Vulnerability Management Jobs (NOW HIRING)

Staff Vulnerability Management Engineer The role in a nutshell: You care deeply about the future of ... Flexible & Remote-First Culture: Work remotely with team meetup opportunities, bi-annual ...

Vulnerability Analyst

AL · On-site +1

$55K - $75K/yr

Fully Remote Salary*: $55,000 - $75,000 *Dependent upon qualifications Summit 7 is here to rise ... Duties and Responsibilities: Vulnerability Assessment and Management * * Conduct regular ...

Vulnerability Analyst

$55K - $75K/yr

Fully Remote Salary*: $55,000 - $75,000 *Dependent upon qualifications Summit 7 is here to rise ... Duties and Responsibilities: Vulnerability Assessment and Management * * Conduct regular ...

... intelligence, vulnerability management, and security foundations What you'll do * Set the ... Strong written communication skills and comfort leading through clear documentation in a remote ...

Showing results 21-40

Director Remote Vulnerability Management information

What does a director of remote vulnerability management do?

A Director of Remote Vulnerability Management leads teams and strategies to identify, assess, and mitigate security vulnerabilities across an organization’s remote infrastructure. This role involves overseeing vulnerability assessments, ensuring compliance with security standards, and coordinating responses to threats that target remote systems and users. The director also collaborates with other IT and security leaders to integrate vulnerability management into broader cybersecurity initiatives, while keeping up with evolving threats and technologies.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as a director of remote vulnerability management?

To thrive as a Director of Remote Vulnerability Management, you need deep expertise in cybersecurity frameworks, risk assessment, and vulnerability management, typically supported by a bachelor’s or master’s degree in information security or a related field. Familiarity with tools such as Qualys, Nessus, Tenable, and certifications like CISSP or CISM are common requirements. Leadership, strategic thinking, and strong communication skills are crucial for managing distributed teams and collaborating across departments. These skills ensure the effective identification, prioritization, and mitigation of security risks in dynamic and remote IT environments.

What are the main challenges faced by a director of remote vulnerability management, and how can they be addressed?

One of the primary challenges in this role is effectively coordinating vulnerability assessments and remediation efforts across distributed teams and diverse technology environments. Ensuring consistent communication, prioritizing vulnerabilities based on risk, and maintaining up-to-date inventories can be complex when managing remote teams and assets. Leveraging automated tools, establishing clear processes, and fostering strong cross-functional relationships with IT, security, and business units are key strategies for overcoming these challenges. Regularly scheduled meetings and transparent reporting also help align remote teams and ensure timely issue resolution.

What is the difference between Director Remote Vulnerability Management vs Vulnerability Analyst?

AspectDirector Remote Vulnerability ManagementVulnerability Analyst
CertificationsCertified Ethical Hacker (CEH), CISSP, CISACompTIA Security+, CEH, GIAC Security Essentials (GSEC)
Work EnvironmentStrategic leadership, cross-department collaboration, overseeing teamsHands-on analysis, vulnerability scanning, report generation
Employer & Industry UsageLarge enterprises, cybersecurity firms, IT departmentsSecurity teams, IT departments, consulting firms
Search & Comparison IntentUnderstanding leadership roles in vulnerability managementTechnical analysis and operational tasks

The main difference is that the Director Remote Vulnerability Management focuses on strategic oversight, team leadership, and policy development, while the Vulnerability Analyst handles technical vulnerability assessments and analysis. Both roles require cybersecurity certifications, but the director's role is more managerial and strategic, whereas the analyst's role is more technical and operational.

More about Director Remote Vulnerability Management jobs

What cities are hiring for Director Remote Vulnerability Management jobs?

Cities with the most Director Remote Vulnerability Management job openings:

What are the most commonly searched types of Remote Vulnerability Management jobs?

The most popular types of Remote Vulnerability Management jobs are:

What states have the most Director Remote Vulnerability Management jobs?

States with the most job openings for Director Remote Vulnerability Management jobs include:

Infographic showing various Director Remote Vulnerability Management job openings in the United States as of August 2026, with employment types broken down into 1% As Needed, 84% Full Time, 13% Part Time, and 2% Contract. Highlights an 84% Physical, 3% Hybrid, and 13% Remote job distribution.

DFC - Vulnerability Management Analyst

cFocus Software Incorporated

Washington, DC • Remote

Full-time

Posted 24 days ago


Job description

cFocus Software seeks a Vulnerability Management Analyst to join our program supporting the United States International Defense Finance Agency (DFC). This position is remote. This position requires an Active Public Trust clearance.
Qualifications:
  • Active Public Trust clearance
  • B.S. Computer Science, Information Technology, or a related field
  • 5+ years of cybersecurity experience, including three or more years in vulnerability management, security compliance, POA&M management, or a closely related function.
  • Hands-on experience analyzing authenticated scan results and validating vulnerabilities using Tenable Nessus, Qualys, Microsoft Defender, or comparable enterprise platforms.
  • Demonstrated ability to assess vulnerability risk using CVSS, exploitability, CISA KEV status, asset criticality, exposure, mission impact, threat intelligence, and compensating controls.
  • Experience creating and maintaining POA&M records, tracking remediation milestones, reconciling GRC and ticketing systems, validating closure evidence, and documenting false-positive determinations.
  • Working knowledge of FISMA, the NIST Risk Management Framework, NIST SP 800-53 controls, NIST SP 800-40 vulnerability and patch-management principles, CISA KEV/BOD 22-01 requirements, and federal continuous-monitoring expectations.
  • Ability to communicate technical risk clearly to federal cybersecurity leaders, System Owners, engineers, administrators, auditors, and nontechnical stakeholders.
  • Strong analytical writing, data-quality, documentation, prioritization, and time-management skills in a deadline-driven environment.
  • Active Security+, CySA+, CEH, GCVA, CISSP or other relevant security certifications preferred.

Duties:
  • Coordinate authenticated vulnerability scans with DFC stakeholders at frequencies aligned with policy, system criticality, exposure, threat conditions, and Government direction.
  • Analyze output from Tenable, Qualys, Microsoft Defender, and other Government-approved vulnerability, endpoint, configuration, and posture-management platforms.
  • Validate scanner findings against the operational environment and distinguish valid findings from false positives using documented rationale and supporting evidence.
  • Assess and assign severity using CVSS, DFC policy, exploitability, known-exploitation status, asset criticality, external exposure, mission impact, and relevant threat intelligence.
  • Recommend risk-informed remediation priorities, actions, timelines, evidence requirements, and closure criteria.
  • Coordinate with engineering, operations, application, cloud, endpoint, and system administration teams to establish remediation ownership, dependencies, and target completion dates
  • Provide rapid analysis and coordination for CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV), Binding Operational Directive 22-01 requirements, CISA Emergency Directives, vendor-declared zero-days, and vulnerabilities with active exploitation.
  • Notify the ISSM within four hours of applicable CISA notification, vendor disclosure, Government notification, or Contractor identification.
  • Verify exposure across applicable CSAM authorization boundaries and deliver a written impact assessment within one business day.
  • Document affected systems, boundaries and assets; severity; exposure; exploitability; known exploitation; mission impact; remediation ownership; required timelines; recommended action; and residual-risk considerations.
  • Track emergency remediation against CISA-, DFC-, or Government-directed deadlines and provide written confirmation of remediation status, compliance status, residual risk, and closure evidence.
  • Use CSAM as the authoritative POA&M and compliance ledger and ServiceNow as the operational remediation ticketing record.
  • Create complete POA&M items in CSAM within three business days after finding identification or Government direction, unless the Government establishes another deadline.
  • Populate and maintain required fields, including identifier, weakness description, affected system and control, severity, source, responsible owner, required resources, scheduled completion date, milestones, status, residual risk, and closure evidence.
  • Maintain bidirectional traceability so each applicable ServiceNow remediation ticket links to its CSAM POA&M item and each CSAM POA&M record references the appropriate ServiceNow ticket.
  • Track remediation through closure, monitor milestone integrity and aging, and coordinate scheduled-completion-date changes only after federal authorization.
  • Conduct monthly ServiceNow-to-CSAM reconciliation; identify stale or duplicate records, missing links or evidence, inconsistent status, inaccurate dates, and other data-quality issues; issue a written discrepancy log and track gaps to resolution.
  • Prepare risk-acceptance or exception recommendation packages when remediation cannot be completed within applicable timelines or scheduled-completion-date constraints.
  • Document the affected system and weakness, operational and mission impacts, exploitability, exposure, residual risk, compensating controls, remediation constraints, proposed duration and expiration, review interval, and conditions for continued acceptance.
  • Route recommendation packages to the AODR through the COR and ISSM for federal decision and accurately record approved decisions in CSAM.
  • Clearly preserve federal authority: do not accept risk for DFC, approve exceptions, extend POA&M dates without authorization, or make final closure decisions.

Powered by JazzHR

vNBNiobreH