ZipRecruiter

Log In

2

Remote Scientific Reviewer Jobs (NOW HIRING)

micro1 AI

Senior Scientific Reviewer - Physics

Odessa, TX · On-site +1

$80 - $150/hr

Remote (US, Canada, UK focused) micro1 is engaging Physics Experts (Postdoc / Junior professor) to ... Critically evaluate and review physics solutions, mathematical derivations, and theoretical ...

micro1 AI

Senior Scientific Reviewer - Physics

Detroit, MI · On-site +1

$80 - $150/hr

Remote (US, Canada, UK focused) micro1 is engaging Physics Experts (Postdoc / Junior professor) to ... Critically evaluate and review physics solutions, mathematical derivations, and theoretical ...

micro1 AI

Senior Scientific Reviewer - Physics

Topeka, KS · On-site +1

$80 - $150/hr

Remote (US, Canada, UK focused) micro1 is engaging Physics Experts (Postdoc / Junior professor) to ... Critically evaluate and review physics solutions, mathematical derivations, and theoretical ...

micro1 AI

Senior Scientific Reviewer - Physics

Newark, NJ · On-site +1

$80 - $150/hr

Remote (US, Canada, UK focused) micro1 is engaging Physics Experts (Postdoc / Junior professor) to ... Critically evaluate and review physics solutions, mathematical derivations, and theoretical ...

micro1 AI

Senior Scientific Reviewer - Physics

El Paso, TX · On-site +1

$80 - $150/hr

Remote (US, Canada, UK focused) micro1 is engaging Physics Experts (Postdoc / Junior professor) to ... Critically evaluate and review physics solutions, mathematical derivations, and theoretical ...

micro1 AI

Senior Scientific Reviewer - Physics

Plano, TX · On-site +1

$80 - $150/hr

Remote (US, Canada, UK focused) micro1 is engaging Physics Experts (Postdoc / Junior professor) to ... Critically evaluate and review physics solutions, mathematical derivations, and theoretical ...

micro1 AI

Senior Scientific Reviewer - Physics

Aurora, CO · On-site +1

$80 - $150/hr

Remote (US, Canada, UK focused) micro1 is engaging Physics Experts (Postdoc / Junior professor) to ... Critically evaluate and review physics solutions, mathematical derivations, and theoretical ...

next page

Showing results 1-20

All JobsScientific Reviewer JobsRemote Scientific Reviewer Jobs

Remote Scientific Reviewer information

See salary details

$13

$31

$52

How much do remote scientific reviewer jobs pay per hour?

As of Aug 15, 2026, the average hourly pay for remote scientific reviewer in the United States is $31.48, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $19.23 and $40.14 per hour, depending on experience, location, and employer.

How does a remote scientific reviewer typically collaborate with research teams and authors during the review process?

As a Remote Scientific Reviewer, you will primarily interact with research teams and authors via digital platforms, such as email and manuscript submission systems. Communication is often asynchronous, allowing you to provide detailed feedback, request clarifications, and discuss revisions with authors from anywhere in the world. You may also coordinate with editorial teams and other reviewers to ensure consistency in evaluations and uphold publication standards. While direct meetings are rare, clear and constructive written communication is essential for effective collaboration in this remote role.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as a remote scientific reviewer, and why are they important?

To thrive as a Remote Scientific Reviewer, you need an advanced degree in a relevant scientific discipline, strong analytical abilities, and expertise in scientific writing and research evaluation. Familiarity with manuscript submission systems, reference management software, and peer review platforms is typically required. Attention to detail, impartial judgment, and clear communication are crucial soft skills for providing constructive feedback and maintaining objectivity. These skills ensure the integrity and quality of scientific publications, supporting the advancement of research within the field.

What is a remote scientific reviewer?

A Remote Scientific Reviewer is a professional who evaluates scientific manuscripts, research proposals, or grant applications from a remote location, typically for academic journals, funding agencies, or research organizations. Their main role is to assess the quality, accuracy, and originality of scientific work to ensure it meets established standards before publication or funding. Remote Scientific Reviewers use their subject matter expertise to provide constructive feedback and recommendations for improvement. This job allows for flexible work arrangements and often requires strong analytical, writing, and communication skills.
More about Remote Scientific Reviewer jobs

What cities are hiring for Remote Scientific Reviewer jobs?

Cities with the most Remote Scientific Reviewer job openings:

What are the most commonly searched types of Scientific Reviewer jobs?

The most popular types of Scientific Reviewer jobs are:

What states have the most Remote Scientific Reviewer jobs?

States with the most job openings for Remote Scientific Reviewer jobs include:

What job categories do people searching Remote Scientific Reviewer jobs look for?

The top searched job categories for Remote Scientific Reviewer jobs are:

Remote Scientific Reviewer jobs near you
Infographic showing various Remote Scientific Reviewer job openings in the United States as of August 2026, with employment types broken down into 1% Internship, 1% As Needed, 81% Full Time, 14% Part Time, and 3% Contract. Highlights an 80% Physical, 3% Hybrid, and 17% Remote job distribution, with an average salary of $65,473 per year, or $31.5 per hour.

Senior Scientific Reviewer - Physics

micro1 AI

Odessa, TX • On-site, Remote

$80 - $150/hr

Part-time

Posted 12 days ago

Job description

Role Title: Physics Expert (Postdoc / Junior professor)


Role Type: Contractor


Location: Remote (US, Canada, UK focused)


micro1 is engaging Physics Experts (Postdoc / Junior professor) to participate in a high-impact project supporting a customer in the science and technology sector. In this role, you'll apply your expertise to help train next-generation AI systems. Your work will shape how models learn, reason, and perform through high-quality, real-world input. No prior experience in AI is required — your domain knowledge is what matters.


Scope of Work

  1. Critically evaluate and review physics solutions, mathematical derivations, and theoretical arguments generated by researchers or AI platforms.
  2. Detect errors, unjustified steps, missing assumptions, dimensional inconsistencies, and weaknesses in logic or methodology.
  3. Delineate between substantive scientific issues and stylistic or cosmetic matters, providing technically precise written feedback.
  4. Articulate and document the reasoning behind any identified flaws, ensuring actionable guidance for improvement.
  5. Recognize when correct reasoning can be optimized, and offer suggestions to sharpen or clarify the argument.
  6. Utilize LaTeX, SymPy, Python, and Jupyter to independently verify or counter-check scientific claims as appropriate.
  7. Deliver structured feedback designed to support iterative enhancement of submitted work and project outcomes.


Preferred Qualifications

  1. PhD in physics and an active record of independent research within a specialized subfield (e.g., High Energy/Mathematical Physics, Biophysics/Statistical Physics, Condensed Matter, AMO/Quantum Optics, Gravitation/Cosmology, Quantum Information, or Optical Materials).
  2. Experience as a postdoctoral researcher, research fellow, junior/assistant professor, or senior research scientist.
  3. Recent (last ~5 years) representative publications in the relevant subfield, with arXiv or DOI links.
  4. Advanced proficiency with LaTeX, SymPy, Python, and Jupyter for theoretical modeling and computational validation.
  5. Demonstrated skill in reviewing the work of others—through peer review, supervision, dissertation committees, or group seminars.
  6. Exceptional written communication skills with the ability to convey nuanced, constructive feedback with technical rigor.
  7. Reliable access to high-speed internet and a computer suitable for rigorous technical work.

Apply