ZipRecruiter

Log In

1

Scientific Journal Reviewer Jobs (NOW HIRING)

Sralab

Senior Scientific Writer - CBM Lab

Chicago, IL

$71K - $124K/yr

Review publications and recommend revisions or changes in grammar approach, scope, format, and ... Experience with preparation of grant proposals and scientific journal articles and familiarity with ...

Brillient

Science Disclosure Analyst

Silver Spring, MD · On-site +1

Disclosure Review * Redaction of Records * Communication and Reporting, to include, but not limited ... Experience reading/analyzing scientific journal articles. * Bench science in a scientific research ...

Augusta University Medical Center

Postdoctoral Fellow

Augusta, GA · On-site

$46K - $62K/yr

  • Medical

  • Dental

  • Life

  • Retirement

  • PTO

Compose articles for publication in scientific journals; Review articles prepared by others. COODINATE ACTIVITIES OF STUDENT, GRAD ASSISTANTS, etc. :Supervise and coordinate activities of students ...

Georgia Institute of Technology

Postdoctoral Fellow

Atlanta, GA · On-site

$47K - $64K/yr

  • Medical

  • Dental

  • Life

  • Retirement

  • PTO

Compose articles for publication in scientific journals; Review articles prepared by others. COODINATE ACTIVITIES OF STUDENT, GRAD ASSISTANTS, etc. :Supervise and coordinate activities of students ...

next page

Showing results 1-20

All JobsEducation JobsBusiness Education JobsBusiness Trainer JobsScientific Journal Reviewer Jobs

Scientific Journal Reviewer information

See salary details

$10

$29

$48

How much do scientific journal reviewer jobs pay per hour?

As of Aug 19, 2026, the average hourly pay for scientific journal reviewer in the United States is $29.88, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $22.60 and $36.54 per hour, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What is a scientific journal reviewer?

A Scientific Journal Reviewer evaluates research manuscripts submitted to academic journals, assessing their quality, validity, and relevance before publication. Reviewers provide constructive feedback to authors, suggest improvements, and help editors decide whether to accept, revise, or reject a submission. This role requires expertise in a specific field, critical thinking, and an understanding of research methodologies. Reviewers contribute to maintaining the integrity and credibility of scientific literature by ensuring high standards of scholarship.

What is the typical workflow or process for a scientific journal reviewer during the peer review process?

A typical workflow begins with receiving an invitation to review a manuscript, which includes assessing the paper's relevance to your expertise before accepting the assignment. Reviewers then carefully read the manuscript, evaluate the scientific methodology and validity of findings, and prepare a detailed written report with constructive feedback and recommendations for editors and authors. The process often involves working independently, but may also include confidential discussions with editorial teams to clarify expectations. Efficient time management is important, as most journals expect reviews to be completed within two to four weeks. This role is vital for maintaining the quality and integrity of scientific literature.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as a scientific journal reviewer?

To thrive as a Scientific Journal Reviewer, you need advanced expertise in a specific scientific field, strong analytical skills, and proven research experience, typically evidenced by a graduate degree (often a Ph.D.). Familiarity with online manuscript submission systems and reference management tools is common, though formal certifications are not usually required. Excellent critical thinking, written communication, and time management skills help reviewers provide constructive feedback while meeting deadlines. These competencies ensure rigorous peer review, uphold publication standards, and contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge.

How much do scientific journal reviewers get paid?

Scientific journal reviewers are typically unpaid or receive modest honoraria, with some journals offering between $50 and $300 per review. Payment varies depending on the journal, the review's complexity, and the reviewer's expertise, but many reviewers contribute voluntarily as part of academic service.

How much do scientific journal reviewers make?

Scientific journal reviewers are typically unpaid or receive modest honoraria, often ranging from $0 to a few hundred dollars per review, depending on the journal. Most reviewers contribute voluntarily as part of academic or professional service, though some specialized or paid positions may offer higher compensation.

How to become a scientific journal reviewer?

To become a scientific journal reviewer, typically you need expertise in a relevant field, a strong publication record, and often a connection with academic or research institutions. Gaining experience through publishing and networking with editors can increase your chances of being invited to review manuscripts. Some journals also require familiarity with peer review processes and may prefer reviewers with specific certifications or training in research ethics.
More about Scientific Journal Reviewer jobs

What cities are hiring for Scientific Journal Reviewer jobs?

Cities with the most Scientific Journal Reviewer job openings:

What are the most commonly searched types of Scientific Journal Reviewer jobs?

The most popular types of Scientific Journal Reviewer jobs are:

What states have the most Scientific Journal Reviewer jobs?

States with the most job openings for Scientific Journal Reviewer jobs include:

What job categories do people searching Scientific Journal Reviewer jobs look for?

The top searched job categories for Scientific Journal Reviewer jobs are:

Scientific Journal Reviewer jobs near you
Infographic showing various Scientific Journal Reviewer job openings in the United States as of August 2026, with employment types broken down into 74% Full Time, 23% Part Time, and 3% Temporary. Highlights an 97% In-person, and 3% Remote job distribution, with an average salary of $62,159 per year, or $29.9 per hour.

Scientific Writer (Onsite Consultant)

Nanobiosym

Cambridge, MA • On-site

$70K - $150K/yr

Contractor

Re-posted 20 days ago

Job description

Job Title: Scientific Writer (Onsite Consultant)
Location: Cambridge, MA
About the Role:
We are seeking an experienced Scientific Writer with a strong background in scientific editing and publication to support our research and communications team. The ideal candidate will have a PhD or Master's degree in a science discipline, and prior experience as a senior editor or lead writer for leading scientific journals, magazines, or research institutions is preferred.
This is an onsite consulting role requiring close collaboration with scientists, researchers, and leadership teams to translate complex scientific concepts into high-impact written content for diverse audiences.
Key Responsibilities:
  • Help frame, edit, and refine scientific manuscripts, white papers, technical briefs, and grant proposals.
  • Collaborate with research teams to develop clear, compelling narratives that align with publication standards and organizational objectives.
  • Translate technical research into accessible content for regulatory submissions, funding bodies, and public communication.
  • Review and improve structure, clarity, and scientific accuracy of documents.
  • Ensure consistency with journal or funding agency guidelines.
  • Provide strategic editorial input on publishing, communications, and dissemination strategies.

Qualifications:
  • Master's degree (Ph.D. preferred) in a physical science, life science or related scientific field.
  • 5+ years of experience in scientific writing and editing, with a strong track record of published work.
  • Prior role as a senior editor, managing editor, or equivalent at a leading scientific journal (Science, Nature, Cell, etc.), research publication, or magazine.
  • Exceptional writing, editing, and communication skills.
  • Strong understanding of scientific publishing standards, formatting peer review processes, and technical accuracy.
  • Ability to work onsite and collaborate in person with interdisciplinary teams.

Preferred Experience:
  • Experience writing for both technical and non-technical audiences.
  • Familiarity with grant and funding proposal writing.
  • Knowledge of regulatory or policy writing is a plus.

Apply