1

Scientific Journal Reviewer Jobs (NOW HIRING)

Review and revise thesis to align with scientific journal audience and policy. * Document any incomplete work or anticipated delays and publish all honors thesis materials for scientific ...

... peer-review process of a scientific journal, preferably in the health sciences · Excellent attention to detail, copyediting, communication, and project management skills · Ability to work ...

Scientific Writer

Orange, CA · On-site

$32 - $35/hr

This role involves preparing, reviewing, and managing regulatory documentation to ensure compliance ... Contributions will include: * generate graphs and figures for journal publications and poster ...

Disclosure Review * Redaction of Records * Communication and Reporting, to include, but not limited ... Experience reading/analyzing scientific journal articles. * Bench science in a scientific research ...

Translate complex scientific concepts into clear, persuasive, and methodologically rigorous ... on journal selection and dissemination strategies to maximize scholarly impact. Literature Review ...

next page

Showing results 1-20

Scientific Journal Reviewer information

See salary details

$10

$29

$48

How much do scientific journal reviewer jobs pay per hour?

As of Jun 9, 2026, the average hourly pay for scientific journal reviewer in the United States is $29.88, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $22.60 and $36.54 per hour, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What is a Scientific Journal Reviewer job?

A Scientific Journal Reviewer evaluates research manuscripts submitted to academic journals, assessing their quality, validity, and relevance before publication. Reviewers provide constructive feedback to authors, suggest improvements, and help editors decide whether to accept, revise, or reject a submission. This role requires expertise in a specific field, critical thinking, and an understanding of research methodologies. Reviewers contribute to maintaining the integrity and credibility of scientific literature by ensuring high standards of scholarship.

What is a typical workflow or process for a Scientific Journal Reviewer during the peer review process?

A typical workflow begins with receiving an invitation to review a manuscript, which includes assessing the paper's relevance to your expertise before accepting the assignment. Reviewers then carefully read the manuscript, evaluate the scientific methodology and validity of findings, and prepare a detailed written report with constructive feedback and recommendations for editors and authors. The process often involves working independently, but may also include confidential discussions with editorial teams to clarify expectations. Efficient time management is important, as most journals expect reviews to be completed within two to four weeks. This role is vital for maintaining the quality and integrity of scientific literature.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive in the Scientific Journal Reviewer position, and why are they important?

To thrive as a Scientific Journal Reviewer, you need advanced expertise in a specific scientific field, strong analytical skills, and proven research experience, typically evidenced by a graduate degree (often a Ph.D.). Familiarity with online manuscript submission systems and reference management tools is common, though formal certifications are not usually required. Excellent critical thinking, written communication, and time management skills help reviewers provide constructive feedback while meeting deadlines. These competencies ensure rigorous peer review, uphold publication standards, and contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge.

More about Scientific Journal Reviewer jobs
What cities are hiring for Scientific Journal Reviewer jobs? Cities with the most Scientific Journal Reviewer job openings:
What are the most commonly searched types of Scientific Journal Reviewer jobs? The most popular types of Scientific Journal Reviewer jobs are:
What states have the most Scientific Journal Reviewer jobs? States with the most job openings for Scientific Journal Reviewer jobs include:
Scientific Writer (Onsite Consultant)

Scientific Writer (Onsite Consultant)

Nanobiosym

Cambridge, MA • On-site

Contractor

Posted 24 days ago


Job description

Job Title: Scientific Writer (Onsite Consultant)
Location: Cambridge, MA
About the Role:
We are seeking an experienced Scientific Writer with a strong background in scientific editing and publication to support our research and communications team. The ideal candidate will have a PhD or Master's degree in a science discipline, and prior experience as a senior editor or lead writer for leading scientific journals, magazines, or research institutions is preferred.
This is an onsite consulting role requiring close collaboration with scientists, researchers, and leadership teams to translate complex scientific concepts into high-impact written content for diverse audiences.

Key Responsibilities:
  • Help frame, edit, and refine scientific manuscripts, white papers, technical briefs, and grant proposals.
  • Collaborate with research teams to develop clear, compelling narratives that align with publication standards and organizational objectives.
  • Translate technical research into accessible content for regulatory submissions, funding bodies, and public communication.
  • Review and improve structure, clarity, and scientific accuracy of documents.
  • Ensure consistency with journal or funding agency guidelines.
  • Provide strategic editorial input on publishing, communications, and dissemination strategies.

Qualifications:
  • Master's degree (Ph.D. preferred) in a physical science, life science or related scientific field.
  • 5+ years of experience in scientific writing and editing, with a strong track record of published work.
  • Prior role as a senior editor, managing editor, or equivalent at a leading scientific journal (Science, Nature, Cell, etc.), research publication, or magazine.
  • Exceptional writing, editing, and communication skills.
  • Strong understanding of scientific publishing standards, formatting peer review processes, and technical accuracy.
  • Ability to work onsite and collaborate in person with interdisciplinary teams.

Preferred Experience:
  • Experience writing for both technical and non-technical audiences.
  • Familiarity with grant and funding proposal writing.
  • Knowledge of regulatory or policy writing is a plus.