1

Academic Reviewer Jobs (NOW HIRING)

Academic Advisor

Indianapolis, IN · On-site

$40K - $49K/yr

Academic Support Advisor Hondros College of Nursing Indianapolis, IN Hondros College of Nursing is ... Review and monitor probation/repeat students at a minimum bi-weekly. Develop action plans for ...

The Academic Manager role is responsible for guiding and managing the administrative day-to-day ... Review girl transcripts to develop a girl's class schedule depending upon District processes

After the end of the term, Academic Specialists review and revise evaluations of students written by faculty to create a common tone and ensure a positive, constructive, student-centered approach.

Manages a broad range of academic and administrative logistics, including departmental reviews, course and faculty tracking, reporting processes, and funding calls. * Provides support for various ...

Facilitate new student's acclimation to the academic environment prior to the first class by reviewing the enrollment process, providing an overview of the on-line or campus classroom and reviewing ...

The Academic Counselor is a 10-month, titled faculty position that provides individualized advising ... Reviews documentation (psychological, diagnostic tests, school documentation and other reports ...

Facilitate new student's acclimation to the academic environment prior to the first class by reviewing the enrollment process, providing an overview of the on-line or campus classroom and reviewing ...

The Academic Counselor is a 10-month, titled faculty position that provides individualized advising ... Reviews documentation (psychological, diagnostic tests, school documentation and other reports ...

The Academic Counselor is a 10-month, titled faculty position that provides individualized advising ... Reviews documentation (psychological, diagnostic tests, school documentation and other reports ...

Facilitate new student's acclimation to the academic environment prior to the first class by reviewing the enrollment process, providing an overview of the on-line or campus classroom and reviewing ...

next page

Showing results 1-20

Academic Reviewer information

See salary details

$10

$29

$48

How much do academic reviewer jobs pay per hour?

As of Jun 14, 2026, the average hourly pay for academic reviewer in the United States is $29.88, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $22.60 and $36.54 per hour, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as an Academic Reviewer, and why are they important?

To thrive as an Academic Reviewer, you need subject matter expertise, advanced research skills, and a strong background in academic writing, often supported by an advanced degree in a relevant field. Familiarity with reference management tools, plagiarism detection software, and journal submission systems is typically required. Attention to detail, critical thinking, and effective communication are vital soft skills that help reviewers provide constructive feedback. These abilities ensure the integrity, clarity, and quality of academic publications, which are essential for advancing scholarly knowledge.

What is the difference between Academic Reviewer vs Peer Reviewer?

AspectAcademic ReviewerPeer Reviewer
Required CredentialsTypically advanced degrees (PhD, Master's)Usually experts in the field, often with similar credentials
Work EnvironmentAcademic journals, universities, research institutionsAcademic journals, conferences, research organizations
Employer & Industry UsageAcademic publishers, universitiesAcademic publishers, scholarly societies
Comparison Search IntentUnderstanding differences in academic rolesClarifying peer review process and roles

Both Academic Reviewers and Peer Reviewers evaluate scholarly work, often holding similar credentials and working within academic publishing or research environments. The main difference lies in scope: Academic Reviewers may have broader responsibilities, including providing detailed feedback and recommendations, while Peer Reviewers primarily assess the quality and validity of submissions. Understanding these roles helps clarify their distinct contributions to academic publishing.

What are some common challenges Academic Reviewers face when evaluating scholarly submissions?

Academic Reviewers often encounter challenges such as managing tight deadlines while ensuring thorough and unbiased evaluations. They must critically assess the quality, originality, and relevance of manuscripts, which can be time-consuming, especially when submissions are outside their primary area of expertise. Additionally, maintaining confidentiality and providing constructive feedback that helps authors improve their work are key responsibilities that require strong communication and ethical judgment.

What are Academic Reviewers?

Academic Reviewers are professionals who evaluate scholarly articles, research papers, or academic submissions to ensure they meet quality standards before publication. Their responsibilities include assessing the validity, originality, clarity, and significance of the work, as well as providing constructive feedback to authors and editors. Academic Reviewers play a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of academic publishing by helping to identify errors, potential ethical issues, or areas for improvement. They typically possess advanced knowledge in the subject area and may work for academic journals, conferences, or educational institutions.
More about Academic Reviewer jobs
What cities are hiring for Academic Reviewer jobs? Cities with the most Academic Reviewer job openings:
What states have the most Academic Reviewer jobs? States with the most job openings for Academic Reviewer jobs include:
Academic Dermatologist - Senior Clinical Reviewer

Academic Dermatologist - Senior Clinical Reviewer

Turing

Fremont, CA • Remote

Other

Posted 4 days ago


Job description

About Turing:

Turing’s mission is to accelerate superintelligence to drive real economic progress. Headquartered in San Francisco, Turing works with frontier AI labs to generate high-quality data, evaluations, and reinforcement learning environments that improve model capabilities in coding, reasoning, tool use, and multimodality. In coding, Turing is the largest and longest-running data provider in the category. Turing also works with Fortune 500 enterprises across Financial Services, Life Sciences, Healthcare, Retail, Automotive, and CPG to build and deploy end-to-end agentic AI systems inside mission-critical workflows. By operating on both sides, Turing closes the loop between frontier research and enterprise deployment, turning real-world deployment signals into better data, evaluations, and more capable models.


Role Overview:

We are hiring US-based academic dermatologists to contribute senior clinical expertise to data curation for frontier AI models and labs. The work supports a longitudinal dermatology dataset used by AI developers, regulatory teams, and academic groups. This is the senior reviewer track of the project. You will lead clinical review on complex cases, contribute to the development of clinical evaluation frameworks, and serve as expert advisor for client teams reviewing AI model outputs.


The role is designed for dermatology faculty who want their academic expertise to count toward something rigorous, and who are interested in AI evaluation, methodology, and the durable infrastructure of clinical AI.


What You'll Do Day-to-Day:

  • Lead senior-level clinical review on complex or ambiguous cases.
  • Facilitate structured resolution of clinical disagreement among reviewers.
  • Contribute to the development of clinical evaluation frameworks.
  • Provide expert advisory hours to client teams reviewing AI model outputs
  • Author guideline-aligned clinical commentary on cases as needed.
  • Provide subspecialty consultation as appropriate


Requirements:

  • Faculty appointment at the rank of Assistant Professor or above at an accredited US medical school or academic medical center
  • Minimum 3 years post-residency completion
  • Board-certified in dermatology by the American Board of Dermatology
  • Active medical license in good standing in at least one US state
  • Active clinical practice
  • Subspecialty fellowship training (dermatopathology, Mohs/procedural, pediatric, or complex medical dermatology).
  • Publication record in peer-reviewed dermatology journals.
  • Prior exposure to clinical AI evaluation, digital health, or dermatology AI research (desired).
  • Active involvement with AAD, ASDS, or other dermatology specialty societies.
  • Prior journal peer review experience. Prior IRB or research committee service.
  • Experience teaching residents or fellows.
  • Deep familiarity with current dermatology guidelines.
  • Strong written articulation of clinical reasoning suitable for peer review
  • Ability to lead and document clinical consensus
  • Comfort with graphic medical images and clinical complexity
  • Disciplined adherence to project protocols


Performance Expectations:

  • Senior reviewer responsibility on assigned case batches.
  • Clinically defensible documentation.
  • Consistent reliability with peer faculty reviewers
  • Constructive client-facing communication during advisory hours.
  • Conflict of interest disclosure.
  • Applicants will be asked to disclose any active equity, advisory, consulting, or paid relationships with dermatology AI companies, digital health platforms, or pharmaceutical companies whose products may appear in case content.
  • Disclosed conflicts do not automatically disqualify applicants but will be considered in case assignment.


Perks of Freelancing with Turing:

  • Competitive pay and flexible remote work.
  • Learn how advanced AI systems are trained.
  • Be part of cutting-edge projects with top LLM companies.
  • Potential for contract extension.
  • Freelance perks: flexibility, global collaboration, and future-proof skills.


Offer Details:

  • Independent contractor (1099): Compensation determined based on years of experience, academic standing, and clinical expertise. Anticipated average 15 hours per week; up to 40 hours per week during peak batches.
  • Engagement type: Pay Per Task.
  • Project and assignment-dependent timeline.
  • NDA required upon engagement; detailed scope of work shared after NDA execution.
  • Fully remote and asynchronous, with occasional synchronous calls.
  • Duration: 4 weeks