ZipRecruiter

Log In

2

Systematic Review Remote Jobs (NOW HIRING)

The Pennsylvania State University

Approval of remote and hybrid work is not guaranteed regardless of work location.For additional ... Contributing to systematic review processes * Conducting literature reviews and providing writing ...

Ripple Effect

Project Manager (Public Health)

Rockville, MD · On-site +1

$118K - $135K/yr

This role is fully remote, but preference for Washington, DC metro area * Employee Type : Exempt ... Familiarity with systematic review methods, evidence synthesis, or guideline development processes

State of Michigan

Financial Analyst 12

Lansing, MI · On-site +1

$29.92 - $43.73/hr

Permanent Full Time Remote Employment: Flexible/Hybrid Job Number: 5901-26-FS-26-FA12-CT Department ... Experience Three years of professional experience providing a systematic review, analysis ...

State of Michigan

Financial Analyst 12

Lansing, MI · On-site +1

$29.92 - $43.73/hr

... remote work and alternate work schedule requests for this position may be considered. Required ... Experience Three years of professional experience providing a systematic review, analysis ...

previous pagenext page

Showing results 21-40

All JobsRemote JobsHealthcare JobsSystematic Review Remote Jobs

Systematic Review Remote information

What is a systematic review remote?

A Systematic Review Remote job involves conducting systematic reviews of research literature while working from a remote location. Systematic reviews are comprehensive, structured assessments of available studies on a specific topic, aiming to synthesize evidence in a transparent and reproducible way. In this role, professionals search databases, screen articles, extract data, and analyze findings using established protocols. Remote work allows for flexibility and collaboration with research teams from different locations, often utilizing digital tools for communication and data management.

What are some common challenges faced when conducting systematic reviews remotely, and how can they be addressed?

Conducting systematic reviews remotely often involves coordinating with team members across different locations and time zones, which can make communication and workflow management more complex. Challenges include ensuring consistent data extraction, maintaining version control of documents, and facilitating regular collaboration. These can be addressed by using dedicated project management tools, establishing clear protocols for data handling, and scheduling regular virtual meetings to align progress and resolve issues. Leveraging software designed for systematic reviews, such as Covidence or Rayyan, also helps streamline remote collaboration and documentation.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as a systematic review specialist working remotely, and why are they important?

To excel as a remote Systematic Review Specialist, you need expertise in research methodology, literature searching, and critical appraisal, usually supported by an advanced degree in a health or social science discipline. Familiarity with reference management software (e.g., EndNote, Zotero), systematic review platforms (e.g., Covidence, Rayyan), and databases like PubMed is essential. Strong attention to detail, self-motivation, and effective written communication are vital soft skills for independent and collaborative work in a remote setting. These competencies ensure accurate, reproducible reviews and efficient teamwork despite remote work environments.

What is the difference between Systematic Review Remote vs Research Assistant?

AspectSystematic Review RemoteResearch Assistant
Required credentialsMaster's degree or higher in relevant field, research experienceBachelor's or Master's degree, research or academic background
Work environmentRemote, independent, collaborative online platformsTypically in labs, universities, or research centers, sometimes remote
Employer and industry usageAcademic, healthcare, or research organizationsUniversities, research institutes, labs
Common search and comparison intentUnderstanding remote research roles, specialized tasksEntry-level research roles, academic support

Systematic Review Remote involves conducting comprehensive literature reviews and analysis primarily in a remote setting, often requiring advanced research credentials. Research Assistants support various research projects, usually in academic or lab environments, with less specialized experience. Both roles are integral to research but differ in work environment, credentials, and scope.

More about Systematic Review Remote jobs

What cities are hiring for Systematic Review Remote jobs?

Cities with the most Systematic Review Remote job openings:

What are the most commonly searched types of Systematic Review jobs?

The most popular types of Systematic Review jobs are:

What states have the most Systematic Review Remote jobs?

States with the most job openings for Systematic Review Remote jobs include:

What are popular job titles related to Systematic Review Remote jobs?

For Systematic Review Remote jobs, the most frequently searched job titles are:

Systematic Review Remote jobs near you
Infographic showing various Systematic Review Remote job openings in the United States as of September 2026, with employment types broken down into 1% As Needed, 81% Full Time, 16% Part Time, and 2% Contract. Highlights an 87% Physical, 3% Hybrid, and 10% Remote job distribution.

Medical Evaluation Specialist - Remote

Houston, TX • Remote

YO AI Labs
See more jobs at YO AI Labsexternal

$40 - $90/hr

Full-time

Posted 19 days ago

Job description

Job Title: Medical Evaluation Specialist

Role Type: Contractor
Location: Remote

Job Overview

We are seeking Medical Evaluation Specialists, including medical students, residents, physicians, and qualified biomedical professionals, to contribute clinical expertise to a project focused on evaluating and improving next-generation AI systems.

In this role, you will create and validate challenging medical questions and answers designed to test advanced clinical reasoning. Your work will help assess whether AI systems can accurately interpret medical evidence, synthesize complex information, and apply nuanced clinical judgment.

No prior AI experience is required—your medical knowledge, research skills, and clinical reasoning are what matter most.

Scope of Work
  • Create original, high-difficulty medical question-and-answer pairs covering areas such as diagnosis, pathophysiology, pharmacology, clinical guidelines, and clinical decision-making.
  • Develop questions that require synthesis, interpretation, and genuine medical reasoning rather than simple factual recall.
  • Research and verify answers using primary literature, clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, and authoritative medical references.
  • Document the rationale behind answers and provide appropriate supporting citations.
  • Evaluate AI-generated responses for clinical accuracy, completeness, reasoning quality, and adherence to available evidence.
  • Identify questions that are too straightforward and refine them to increase complexity while maintaining clinical validity.
  • Review questions and answers for ambiguity, unsupported assumptions, factual errors, and inconsistencies.
  • Ensure all deliverables are written with clarity, precision, and defensibility.
  • Incorporate reviewer feedback and adapt work to evolving project guidelines and quality standards.
  • Contribute insights that help establish rigorous benchmarks for medical AI evaluation.
Required Skills
  • Medical Training
  • Research & Source Triangulation
  • Attention to Detail
  • Written Precision
  • Analytical Thinking
  • Clinical Reasoning
  • Medical Literature Review
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • Self-Direction & Reliability
  • Medical Question Development
Preferred Qualifications
  • Current or recent medical training or clinical practice as a medical student, resident, or physician, or equivalent expertise in a relevant biomedical discipline.
  • Demonstrated ability to locate, interpret, compare, and synthesize information from primary research and clinical guidelines.
  • Strong written English skills with exceptional attention to detail.
  • Ability to create engaging, well-structured, challenging, and clinically nuanced questions.
  • Strong understanding of evidence-based medicine and clinical reasoning.
  • Ability to work independently, manage deadlines, and consistently deliver high-quality work in a remote environment.
  • Previous experience with medical question writing, peer review, clinical education, medical content evaluation, or research is a plus.
  • Familiarity with AI/ML systems, AI evaluation, or medical AI applications is advantageous but not required.
Compensation Structure

Compensation is output-based, with contributors paid per task that meets the applicable project specifications and quality standards. The time required to complete each task may vary depending on experience and individual workflow.

Minimum submission requirements apply, and selected contributors are expected to complete a minimum number of tasks per week.

Start Timeline & Availability

Roles are typically filled within 48 hours. Selected contributors should be prepared to begin their first assignments within 24–48 hours of completing onboarding.