ZipRecruiter

Log In

2

Entry Level Robotic Simulation Engineer Jobs in Boston, MA

Autodesk, Inc.

Research Engineer

Boston, MA · On-site

Research EngineerSkip to main content# CareersResearch Engineer page is loaded## Research ... Develop experimental workflows that connect design, simulation, fabrication, sensing, robotics ...

next page

Showing results 1-20

All JobsRobotic Simulation Engineer JobsEntry Level Robotic Simulation Engineer JobsEntry Level Robotic Simulation Engineer Jobs in Boston, MA

Entry Level Robotic Simulation Engineer information

See Boston, MA salary details

$31.5K

$114.7K

$183.6K

How much do entry level robotic simulation engineer jobs pay per year?

As of Sep 11, 2026, the average yearly pay for entry level robotic simulation engineer in Boston, MA is $114,729.00, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $90,700.00 and $138,000.00 per year, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What is the difference between Entry Level Robotic Simulation Engineer vs Entry Level Robotics Software Developer?

AspectEntry Level Robotic Simulation EngineerEntry Level Robotics Software Developer
Primary FocusDeveloping and testing robotic simulation models and environmentsWriting and optimizing software for robotic systems and applications
Required SkillsRobotics, simulation tools, programming (C++, Python), physicsProgramming, algorithms, robotics frameworks, software development
Work EnvironmentResearch labs, simulation platforms, engineering teamsSoftware development teams, robotics companies, tech firms
Common CertificationsRobotics certifications, simulation software trainingSoftware development certifications, robotics courses

Both roles are entry-level positions in robotics, but the Robotic Simulation Engineer focuses on creating and testing virtual models of robots, while the Robotics Software Developer concentrates on coding and developing software for robotic systems. Understanding these distinctions helps job seekers target the right skills and career path in the robotics industry.

What are the most commonly searched types of Robotic Simulation Engineer jobs in Boston, MA?

The most popular types of Robotic Simulation Engineer jobs in Boston, MA are:

What are popular job titles related to Entry Level Robotic Simulation Engineer jobs in Boston, MA?

For Entry Level Robotic Simulation Engineer jobs in Boston, MA, the most frequently searched job titles are:

What job categories do people searching Entry Level Robotic Simulation Engineer jobs in Boston, MA look for?

The top searched job categories for Entry Level Robotic Simulation Engineer jobs in Boston, MA are:

Entry Level Robotic Simulation Engineer jobs near you
Infographic showing various Entry Level Robotic Simulation Engineer job openings in Boston, MA as of September 2026, with employment types broken down into 1% Internship, 85% Full Time, 10% Part Time, and 4% Contract. Highlights an 86% Physical, 4% Hybrid, and 10% Remote job distribution, with an average salary of $114,729 per year, or $55.2 per hour.

Engineer II /Senior Software Engineer, Simulation

Cambridge, MA • On-site

Lila Sciences
See more jobs at Lila Sciencesexternal

$133K - $176K/yr

Full-time

This job post has expired 1 day ago. Applications are no longer accepted.

Job description

Your Impact at LILA

Lila Sciences is building autonomous science platforms that compress the cycle time of scientific discovery. The Robotics and Scheduling teams develop the scheduling and coordination infrastructure that drives our AI Science Factory, commanding instruments, managing robotic fleets, and maximizing throughput across complex, multi-step lab workflows.

We are looking for a Software Engineer to build and maintain a discrete event simulation platform that serves as a fast, lightweight complement to our high-fidelity robotics simulations. Your work will be the primary testbed for iterating on scheduling strategies, fleet coordination algorithms, and capacity planning, exercising the same core decision-making code that runs in production at a fraction of the cost and time. You will work closely with the Robotics and Scheduling teams to ensure the simulation remains a trustworthy, reproducible tool for driving real engineering decisions.

What You'll Be Building

  • Design and maintain a low-fidelity discrete event simulation platform modeling lab workflows, instrument states, and robotic transport.
  • Architect the platform so production scheduling and fleet coordination code runs with minimal changes.
  • Build experiment tracking and reproducibility infrastructure so every run is logged, versioned, and comparable.
  • Develop tooling for parameter sweeps, scheduler benchmarks, and capacity planning across lab configurations and workloads.
  • Partner with Scheduling and Robotics teams to validate new scheduling and coordination strategies.
  • Ship clean, well-documented simulation APIs other engineers can build on.

What You'll Need to Succeed

  • 1-3 years of hands-on experience in simulation engineering, operations research, or a closely related field.
  • Strong software engineering fundamentals: testing, CI/CD, API design, and the ability to balance velocity with maintainability.
  • Strong understanding of experiment reproducibility: seeding, versioning, logging, and structured comparison of simulation runs.
  • Solid grasp of system modeling concepts: queuing, resource contention, event scheduling, and stochastic behavior.
  • Strong communication skills and comfort working across teams with different technical backgrounds.

Bonus Points For

  • Practical experience with discrete event simulation (e.g. SimPy).
  • Experience designing and maintaining internal developer tools or platforms.
  • Experience in robotics, warehousing, or logistics environments where physical transport is a first-class part of the system model.
  • Familiarity with scheduling algorithms or heuristics (greedy dispatching, priority rules, constraint-based approaches).
  • Experience with experiment tracking platforms (MLflow, Weights & Biases, or similar).
  • Comfort reasoning about the tradeoffs between simulation fidelity, speed, and coverage of production code paths.

Apply