ZipRecruiter

Log In

1

Scientific Review Officer Jobs (NOW HIRING)

Abbott

Medical Review Officer (MRO)

Kansas City, KS

... scientists. THE OPPORTUNITY: The MRO, a licensed physician, supports the Medical Director in ... Current Medical Review Officer (MRO) certification (AAMRO or MROCC). * Current DOT FMCSA Certified ...

Abbott

Medical Review Officer (MRO)

... scientists. THE OPPORTUNITY: The MRO, a licensed physician, supports the Medical Director in ... Current Medical Review Officer (MRO) certification (AAMRO or MROCC). * Current DOT FMCSA Certified ...

Abbott

Medical Review Officer (MRO)

Kansas City, KS · On-site +1

... scientists. THE OPPORTUNITY: The MRO, a licensed physician, supports the Medical Director in ... Current Medical Review Officer (MRO) certification (AAMRO or MROCC). * Current DOT FMCSA Certified ...

Emmes

Senior Medical Officer

Rockville, MD · Remote

Overview Medical Officer US Remote Emmes Group: Building a better future for us all. Emmes Group is ... Participates in regulatory FDA or other meetings and scientific review meetings. * Interacts with ...

Rock Connections

Chief Scientific Officer

Detroit, MI · On-site

The CSO will also provide regular scientific reporting to the CEO, Executive Director of the ... Provide a structure of group meetings, presentations, brainstorming, review of data, modelling ...

next page

Showing results 1-20

All JobsScientific Review Officer Jobs

Scientific Review Officer information

See salary details

$31.5K

$63K

$99.5K

How much do scientific review officer jobs pay per year?

As of Jul 29, 2026, the average yearly pay for scientific review officer in the United States is $62,965.00, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $45,500.00 and $74,500.00 per year, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as a Scientific Review Officer, and why are they important?

To thrive as a Scientific Review Officer, you need a strong background in scientific research, analytical skills, and typically a doctoral degree in a relevant field. Familiarity with grant management systems, peer review platforms, and regulatory compliance tools is important. Excellent communication, organization, and impartial judgment are crucial soft skills for managing review panels and correspondence. These abilities ensure fair, efficient, and high-quality evaluations of scientific proposals, directly impacting research funding decisions.

What are some common challenges Scientific Review Officers face when coordinating peer review panels?

Scientific Review Officers (SROs) often encounter challenges in managing diverse expert panels, such as aligning schedules across multiple reviewers, ensuring unbiased and thorough evaluations, and handling conflicts of interest. SROs are responsible for organizing complex meetings, facilitating clear communication among scientists with varying backgrounds, and maintaining strict confidentiality throughout the review process. Successfully navigating these challenges requires strong organizational skills, attention to detail, and the ability to mediate and resolve disagreements to ensure fair and rigorous scientific assessments.

What are Scientific Review Officers?

Scientific Review Officers (SROs) are professionals, often with advanced scientific training, who manage the peer review process for research grant applications, typically at government agencies or research institutions. Their primary role is to organize, coordinate, and oversee review panels, ensuring that grant proposals are evaluated fairly and objectively by qualified experts. SROs are responsible for recruiting reviewers, providing guidance on review policies, and summarizing panel discussions. They help uphold the integrity of the research funding process by maintaining transparency and consistency throughout the review. SROs play a vital role in advancing scientific research by facilitating the selection of high-quality projects for funding.

What is the difference between Scientific Review Officer vs Scientific Review Officer?

AspectScientific Review Officer

Since the question compares the same job title, there is no difference between Scientific Review Officer vs Scientific Review Officer. Both roles involve reviewing grant applications, coordinating peer review panels, and ensuring compliance with federal research funding policies. They typically require similar credentials, such as a background in science or health, and are employed in government agencies like NIH or NSF. This comparison is often searched by individuals seeking clarity on the role's responsibilities and qualifications within research funding agencies.

More about Scientific Review Officer jobs
What cities are hiring for Scientific Review Officer jobs? Cities with the most Scientific Review Officer job openings:
What states have the most Scientific Review Officer jobs? States with the most job openings for Scientific Review Officer jobs include:
What job categories do people searching Scientific Review Officer jobs look for? The top searched job categories for Scientific Review Officer jobs are:
Scientific Review Officer jobs near you
Infographic showing various Scientific Review Officer job openings in the United States as of July 2026, with employment types broken down into 97% Full Time, and 3% Part Time. Highlights an 99% Physical, and 1% Remote job distribution, with an average salary of $62,965 per year, or $30.3 per hour.
Medical Officer

Medical Officer

Bristol Bay Shared Services LLC

Atlanta, GA • On-site

Full-time

Posted 14 days ago

Job description

Medical Officer
Eagle Health Analytics, LLC is seeking qualified individuals to support our work with the Epi Task Force as Medical Officers and Reviewers. The candidates will provide support which includes, but is not limited to:
Scientific Review and Clearance Support- provide scientific review and technical support to the Associate Director of Science (ADS)
• Review, provide critical input, and provide decisions to approve, revise or reject scientific documents (e.g., journal manuscripts, MMWR articles, guidance documents, abstracts, posters) of the EPI TF
• Review, provide critical input, and provide decisions to approve, revise or reject scientific documents (e.g., journal manuscripts, MMWR articles, guidance documents, abstracts, posters) of the EPI TF
• Orient new scientific reviewers as they join the ADS Team
• Provide weekend on-call support periodically for the EPI TF ADS team.
• Monitor the ADS mailbox, identify documents needing clearance, coordinate review with ADS.
Policy and Legislative Support-support policy and legislative functions
• Coordinate information for inclusion in responses to Congressional inquiries and correspondence requesting information regarding CDC strategies, programs, and responses to health problems; data; and general information requested about health problems.
• Assist team in managing partnership meetings, department and Congressional hearing or briefings, and visits involving internal and external partners, Members of Congress, Congressional staff and Executive Branch staff.
• Liaise with appropriate subject matter experts (SMEs,) of the Epi TF to help them prepare talking points for briefings or testimonies, and to help develop Qs and As, and manage logistics.
• Research, gather, compile and coordinate information for Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.
Requirements:
• US medical license
• Ability to work independently and efficiently in a team environment with support of supervisor and senior staff
• Excellent time management and organization
• Proficiency with the MS Office suite, including Teams, Outlook, and Word
• Experience working with or supporting federal public health agencies is strongly preferred

Apply