ZipRecruiter

Log In

1

Reviewer Jobs in Iowa (NOW HIRING)

Primebank

Loan Review/Credit Analyst

Le Mars, IA · On-site

This position is responsible for the review and analysis of credit and financial information as well as industry economic data to verify continuing credit worthiness of customers in accordance with ...

Primebank

Loan Review/Credit Analyst

Le Mars, IA · On-site

$50 - $70/hr

This position is responsible for the review and analysis of credit and financial information as well as industry economic data to verify continuing credit worthiness of customers in accordance with ...

United Bank of Iowa

Loan Review Assistant I

Ida Grove, IA · On-site

$33K - $41K/yr

Serves as back-up for Real Estate Appraisal Reviewer as needed. Follows all bank procedures and maintains confidentiality on all banking matters. Sells and promotes all bank services in such a way as ...

Prime Bank

Loan Review/Credit Analyst

Le Mars, IA · On-site

This position is responsible for the review and analysis of credit and financial information as well as industry economic data to verify continuing credit worthiness of customers in accordance with ...

Primebank

Loan Review/Credit Analyst

Le Mars, IA · On-site

This position is responsible for the review and analysis of credit and financial information as well as industry economic data to verify continuing credit worthiness of customers in accordance with ...

previous pagenext page

Showing results 21-40

All JobsReviewer JobsReviewer Jobs in Iowa

Reviewer information

See Iowa salary details

$9

$28

$45

How much do reviewer jobs pay per hour?

As of Sep 2, 2026, the average hourly pay for reviewer in Iowa is $28.07, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $21.20 and $34.33 per hour, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What is a reviewer?

Reviewers are individuals who evaluate and provide feedback on various works, such as academic papers, products, services, or creative projects. Their main role is to assess the quality, accuracy, and relevance of the material, offering constructive criticism and recommendations for improvement. Reviewers are essential in maintaining standards and ensuring that only high-quality works are published or made available to the public. The specific responsibilities of a reviewer can vary depending on the industry or context in which they work.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as a reviewer, and why are they important?

A successful Reviewer needs strong analytical thinking, attention to detail, and expertise in the relevant subject area, often supported by a degree or professional background. Familiarity with review management software, submission tracking systems, and industry-specific guidelines is commonly required. Excellent written communication, objectivity, and time management set outstanding reviewers apart. These skills ensure thorough, fair, and timely evaluations, which uphold the quality and credibility of published work or products.

How do reviewers typically collaborate with other team members during the evaluation process?

Reviewers often work closely with subject matter experts, editors, or project managers to ensure that evaluations are thorough and consistent. Collaboration usually involves regular meetings to discuss criteria, clarify expectations, and address any ambiguities in the material under review. Additionally, Reviewers may provide feedback or suggestions for improvement and participate in group discussions to achieve consensus on final recommendations. This teamwork helps maintain high standards and ensures the integrity of the review process.

What is the difference between Reviewer vs Quality Control Inspector?

AspectReviewerQuality Control Inspector
CredentialsTypically requires a degree or certification in the relevant fieldOften requires technical training or certification in inspection methods
Work EnvironmentOffice or remote review settings, analyzing documents or dataManufacturing, construction, or production sites inspecting products
Employer & IndustryPublishing, media, manufacturing, or software companiesManufacturing, construction, aerospace, or automotive industries
Search & Comparison IntentUnderstanding review roles, responsibilities, and qualificationsComparing inspection and quality assurance roles in industry

While both reviewers and quality control inspectors ensure standards are met, reviewers primarily evaluate documents, data, or content in office settings, focusing on accuracy and compliance. Quality control inspectors physically examine products or processes on-site to identify defects or issues. Their roles overlap in quality assurance but differ in work environment and specific tasks.

How to get a job as a reviewer?

To become a reviewer, gain relevant knowledge in the field you want to review, develop strong communication and critical thinking skills, and build a portfolio or sample reviews. Many reviewer roles require attention to detail, familiarity with review platforms or tools, and sometimes specific certifications or experience in the industry. Applying through company websites, freelance platforms, or industry networks can help you find opportunities.

What are the most commonly searched types of Reviewer jobs in Iowa?

The most popular types of Reviewer jobs in Iowa are:

What are popular job titles related to Reviewer jobs in Iowa?

For Reviewer jobs in Iowa, the most frequently searched job titles are:

What are popular job titles related to Reviewer jobs in IA?

For Reviewer jobs in IA, the most frequently searched job titles are:

Reviewer jobs near you
Infographic showing various Reviewer job openings in Iowa as of August 2026, with employment types broken down into 61% Full Time, 36% Part Time, and 3% Contract. Highlights an 48% Physical, 3% Hybrid, and 49% Remote job distribution, with an average salary of $58,384 per year, or $28.1 per hour.

AI Agent Trajectory Annotator and Reviewer

Bespoke Labs

Iowa City, IA • On-site

$20 - $30/hr

Full-time

Posted 2 days ago

New

Job description

Type: Contract, hourly

Location: Remote

Hours: 20–30 per week

Pay: $20–30/hour, based on experience and language coverage

Start: Immediate

ABOUT THE ROLE

We evaluate how well advanced AI coding agents solve real engineering problems. An agent is given a real open source codebase inside a container and a hard task, then works on its own for 80 to 250 steps. A trajectory is the full record of that run — every command, result, and decision.

You will do two jobs, and you should expect either on any given day.

•Annotate — Read a trajectory nobody has looked at yet and judge it step by step.

• Review — Take an existing annotation, written by our AI tooling or another person, and confirm, correct, or reject it.

TASKS YOU'LL SEE

• Feature build — Add a working feature to a live library without breaking anything that already worked.

• Rebuild — Work out what a compiled tool does by running it, then rebuild it to match its output, exit codes, and file effects.

• Bug hunt — Find and fix twenty undocumented bugs across a dozen files with no test suite, then record what caused them.

Mostly Python and Go, with some Rust, C, and Ct+. A trajectory runs about 100 steps.

WHAT YOU JUDGE IN A TRAJECTORY

• Was the command right for the state the environment was actually in?

• Did the agent read the previous output correctly?

• Was the step wrong, or only inefficient — these are scored differently.

• Where did the run first go off course — usually earlier than where it visibly broke.

• Did the agent notice its own mistake and recover, or keep building on a false assumption?

• Did it game the grader instead of solving the task (e.g., weakening a test or hardcoding an expected value)?

WHAT WE NEED FROM YOU

• Experience — 2+ years in software engineering, DevOps, or site reliability, with real debugging in real codebases.

• Languages — Strong in Python or Go, and able to read a language you've never used.

• Linux — Comfortable with logs, running processes, build failures, and containers.

• Workflow — Everyday Git, diffs, pull requests, and issue tracking.

• Debugging — Able to work with no test suite and no error message pointing at the cause.

• Focus — Able to hold context across a long run, because step 74 can depend on step 12.

• Writing — Clear English, since every judgement needs an explanation another engineer can check.

Apply