1

Research Development Biomedical Engineer Jobs in New York

RESEARCH SCHOLAR

New York, NY ยท On-site

$27/hr

Description Part-Time Research Scholar Biomedical Engineering New York University Biomechatronics ... development, conducting experiments and data processing. The candidates will be expected to:

The Director of Chemical Engineering R&D is responsible for managing a portfolio of projects from our Company's clinical pipeline, including oversight of laboratory-based process development and ...

Senior Scientist, Research & Development

Summit, NJ ยท On-site

$105.40 - $148.80/hr

Senior Scientist, Research & Development What we do At Kenvue, we realize the extraordinary power ... Bioinformatics programming software such as R and minitab * Detail-oriented and able to manage ...

Researcher (Part-time)

New York, NY ยท On-site

$26.37/hr

Description Part time Research Scholar Biomedical Engineering New York University Faculty in the Biomedical Engineering department ( at NYU Tandon School of Engineering is seeking to hire a part-time ...

Research Associate

New York, NY ยท On-site

$48K - $65K/yr

Description FULL TIME RESEARCH ASSOCIATE New York University Tandon School of Engineering ... The Department of Biomedical Engineering department at NYU Tandon focuses on connecting engineering ...

Showing results 41-60

Research Development Biomedical Engineer information

See New York salary details

$22.5K

$104.2K

$174.4K

How much do research development biomedical engineer jobs pay per year?

As of Aug 17, 2026, the average yearly pay for research development biomedical engineer in New York is $104,244.00, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $82,700.00 and $122,100.00 per year, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What are some common challenges research development biomedical engineers face when transitioning projects from the lab to clinical settings?

One of the main challenges Research Development Biomedical Engineers encounter is ensuring that prototypes developed in the lab meet stringent regulatory standards and function reliably in real-world clinical environments. This often involves extensive collaboration with clinicians, regulatory specialists, and manufacturing teams to adapt designs based on user feedback and compliance requirements. Additionally, engineers must balance innovation with safety and scalability, which can require iterative testing and adjustments. Successfully navigating these challenges is crucial for bringing impactful biomedical solutions to market.

What is the difference between Research Development Biomedical Engineer vs Clinical Biomedical Engineer?

AspectResearch Development Biomedical EngineerClinical Biomedical Engineer
CredentialsBachelor's or Master's in Biomedical Engineering; often requires research experienceBachelor's or Master's in Biomedical Engineering; may require clinical certifications
Work EnvironmentResearch labs, development centers, R&D departmentsHospitals, clinics, medical device maintenance
Employer & IndustryMedical device companies, research institutions, biotech firmsHospitals, healthcare facilities, medical equipment companies

Research Development Biomedical Engineers focus on designing and developing new medical devices and technologies in research settings, while Clinical Biomedical Engineers primarily maintain, troubleshoot, and ensure the safety of medical equipment in clinical environments. Both roles require biomedical engineering credentials but differ in daily tasks and work settings.

What is a research development biomedical engineer?

A Research Development Biomedical Engineer is a professional who combines principles of engineering, biology, and medicine to develop innovative medical devices, technologies, or systems. They work at the intersection of research and product development, often collaborating with clinicians and scientists to translate scientific discoveries into practical healthcare solutions. Their responsibilities may include designing prototypes, conducting experiments, analyzing data, and ensuring that products meet regulatory standards. These engineers play a crucial role in advancing medical technology and improving patient care.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as a research development biomedical engineer?

To thrive as a Research Development Biomedical Engineer, you need a strong background in biomedical engineering principles, research methodologies, and a relevant degree such as a BS or MS in Biomedical Engineering or a related field. Familiarity with CAD software, laboratory instrumentation, and regulatory compliance standards like FDA or ISO is typically required. Strong problem-solving abilities, teamwork, and effective communication skills help you excel in collaborative and fast-paced research settings. These skills and qualities are vital to innovate, ensure product safety, and translate research findings into practical medical solutions.

What are popular job titles related to Research Development Biomedical Engineer jobs in New York?

For Research Development Biomedical Engineer jobs in New York, the most frequently searched job titles are:

What job categories do people searching Research Development Biomedical Engineer jobs in New York look for?

The top searched job categories for Research Development Biomedical Engineer jobs in New York are:

What cities in New York are hiring for Research Development Biomedical Engineer jobs?

Cities in New York with the most Research Development Biomedical Engineer job openings:

Infographic showing various Research Development Biomedical Engineer job openings in New York as of August 2026, with employment types broken down into 75% Full Time, and 25% Contract. Highlights an 74% In-person, 13% Hybrid, and 13% Remote job distribution, with an average salary of $104,244 per year, or $50.1 per hour.

Director of Research & Development

Still Bright

Kenilworth, NJ โ€ข On-site

$195.30 - $238.70/hr

Other

Re-posted 3 days ago


Job description

Reports to: Chief Technology Officer

Close collaboration with: Process Modeling, Product Engineering teams

Location: Kenilworth, NJ

Salary starts at: $217,00

Equity grant reflecting the seniority and trust of the role

Competitive Benefits

Position Summary

Still Bright is bringing the first viable hydrometallurgical alternative to copper smelting to market at a moment when global copper demand is outpacing supply by historic margins. Our proprietary RACER (Rapid and Complete Electrochemical Reduction) process delivers fast, complete copper extraction while recovering precious and critical co-products, and as a closed-loop system it offers precise control over outputs and radically reduces environmental impact. Backed by top-tier investors including Breakthrough Energy Ventures and Material Impact, the team is moving from pilot execution into the next stages of commercial deployment.

The Director of Research & Development is accountable for building and leading Still Brightโ€™s research function and delivering the experimental, technical, and team outcomes required to de-risk the RACER process chemistry and its integration with downstream recovery as the company moves from pilot through demonstration and into commercial deployment. This role owns the applied and exploratory research pipeline: the experimental programs that advance copper extraction, qualify new and complex feedstocks, map the deportment of elements through the system, and establish the compatibility of RACER with solvent extraction, electrowinning, and downstream flotation for co-product recovery.

Understanding how every element deports through the RACER system, and qualifying the companyโ€™s pipeline of new and complex feedstocks against it, is owned by this role. As Still Bright moves from a small set of proven feedstocks toward the wide range of ores, concentrates, and tailings the commercial business will process, the Director owns the science that determines what RACER can take, what it recovers, and where deleterious elements go.

Given the size of the team, this is a hands-on technical leadership role: the person in this seat is in the lab regularly, not exclusively in supervisory mode. The Director sets the technical standard for experimental rigor, data quality, and process-design discipline, and mentors scientists, engineers, and technicians on the team.

Working in close alignment with the Chief Technology Officer, the Director independently drives execution against the research priorities the Chief Technology Officer sets, leads and develops a high-performing team of scientists, engineers, and senior technicians, manages consultants and external partners, mitigates technical and operational risks, and ensures environmental and ethical responsibility. The role translates those priorities into experimental designs and resourcing plans, guides experimental and commissioning work, and makes data-driven decisions about how that work is executed to determine pilot readiness.

Key Responsibilities
  • Own the companyโ€™s understanding of elemental deportment across the RACER system: how copper, precious metals, co-products, and deleterious elements (arsenic, bismuth, antimony, and others) partition across leaching, reduction, solvent extraction, electrowinning, and downstream flotation, and how that partitioning shifts with each feedstock.

  • Own qualification of new and complex feedstocks: direct the characterization and testwork (XRD, SEM, XRF, QEMSCAN, ICP-MS, Fire Assay) that determines whether a given concentrate, ore, or tailings stream is compatible with RACER, and define the operating adjustments required to process it.

  • Build and maintain the deportment and recovery models that translate feedstock variability into defensible performance expectations, and keep them current as the companyโ€™s feedstock pipeline grows.

  • Lead day-to-day execution of the research and process-development program, including experimental design, scheduling, data collection, and analysis.

  • Translate the Chief Technology Officerโ€™s research priorities into experimental programs: design the experiments and define the resources, equipment, personnel, and timelines required to execute them across RACER chemistry, feedstock diversification, co-product recovery, and downstream integration.

  • Manage a team of research scientists, engineers, and senior technicians, with direct responsibility for performance management, professional development, and technical mentorship.

  • Direct the research establishing RACERโ€™s compatibility with solvent extraction, electrowinning, and downstream flotation, and the recovery of copper and saleable by-products.

  • Predict metallurgical and chemical challenges and opportunities for different feedstock opportunities, as well as upstream and downstream mining processes.

  • Own bench-level execution of site-specific feedstock testing: ore characterization protocols, recovery curve generation, deleterious-element handling experiments, and the data work that feeds the companyโ€™s economic models.

  • Act as a resident expert for the business and technical teams on all things copper processing, helping integrate RACER seamlessly with mining operations and typical processing considerations.

  • Own quality control of experimental data and technical documentationโ€”data integrity, calibration discipline, reproducibility of experimental conditions, and clean record-keeping that supports decision-making and future audit defensibility.

  • Uphold excellence in experimentation plans, laboratory procedures and safety, and research records. Working mostly in-person is required to ensure proper oversight of laboratory work.

Definition of Success

In the first 12 months, success looks like: a research function staffed and reliably delivering high-quality experimental work against the Chief Technology Officerโ€™s research priorities, on schedule; a defensible, data-backed model of elemental deportment through the system across the companyโ€™s priority feedstocks; a working framework for qualifying new and complex feedstocks against RACER; a validated understanding of RACERโ€™s compatibility with solvent extraction, electrowinning, and downstream flotation feeding the companyโ€™s scale-up decisions and economic models; and clean documentation and process know-how transferred to the demonstration program as the first demonstration unit moves into field deployment.

Qualifications & Experience

Expected Competencies

  • Doctorate in chemical engineering, metallurgical engineering, electrochemistry, or a related field strongly preferred; a Masterโ€™s with commensurate experience will be considered.

  • Minimum of 10 years of industrial or research experience, including 1โ€“2 years at the Director level or 3โ€“4 years at the manager level, in hydrometallurgy, electrochemistry, or process engineering within the mining or metallurgy industry.

  • Deep understanding of elemental deportment and mass-balance accounting of trace, co-product, and deleterious elements across complex feedstocks.

  • Direct people management experience leading a team of scientists, engineers, or senior technicians on technical execution work.

  • Excellent understanding of copper mineralogy and processing, especially hydrometallurgical methods and emerging technologies.

  • Demonstrated hands-on contributor capability: comfortable being in the lab and on the pilot system regularly.

  • Strong experimental design, data analysis, and project-management disciplineโ€”schedules, milestones, resource allocation, and clear progress reporting.

  • Comfort in a startup or scale-up environment where infrastructure and processes are still being built. Some travel will be required for pilot and feedstock testing.

Strongly Preferred Experience

  • Demonstrated expertise in solid, liquid, and gaseous phase characterization techniques (XRD, SEM, XRF, QEMSCAN, ICP-MS, Fire Assay).

  • Direct experience with pilot-plant or demonstration-scale metallurgical systems, including commissioning, operation, and troubleshooting.

  • Proven track record translating bench-scale results into pilot-scale performance, and integrating multiple unit operations into a continuous or semi-continuous process.

  • Additional consideration for experience managing copper ore impurities such as arsenic, bismuth, and gold.

  • Experience with one or more of: vanadium electrochemistry, sulfide leaching chemistry, solvent extractionโ€“electrowinning, continuous stirred tank reactor design and operation.

  • Familiarity with process controls, instrumentation, and real-time performance monitoring.

  • Internal promotion candidates: existing context on the RACER process, team relationships, and demonstrated execution capability.

Nice-to-Have

  • Leadership of a pilot campaign through sustained operation or scale-up decision milestones.

  • Contribution to demo-plant design, studies, or commercial deployment readiness.

  • Familiarity with quality management systems (ISO 9001 or equivalent) and document control discipline.

  • Spanish-language proficiency.

Boundary with the Chief Technology Officer

The Chief Technology Officer owns the technology and the science: the RACER process chemistry and flowsheet, intellectual property strategy and patent prosecution, the next-generation research pipeline, the scientific advisory board, and external engagement with investors and academic collaborators. The Chief Technology Officer sets the research priorities, working from the gap between where the product is today and where it needs to be in both the short and long term, and delegates those priorities to the Director of Research & Development.

The Director of Research & Development owns the design and delivery of the research that meets those priorities: translating each delegated objective into a design of experiments, defining the resources, equipment, personnel, and timelines required, leading the research scientists and technicians, ensuring data integrity and reproducibility, and translating laboratory results into the elemental-deportment, feedstock-qualification, and recovery understanding that informs scale-up. The operating rule that makes the split work: the Chief Technology Officer sets and owns the research priorities; the Director of Research & Development determines how to accomplish them and executes. The Director may surface technical input, risks, and trade-offs, but executes the research agenda as prioritized by the Chief Technology Officer; setting, re-ordering, or paring down those priorities is the Chief Technology Officerโ€™s responsibility, not the Directorโ€™s. Given the size of the team, the Director is expected to remain hands-on, contributing directly in the lab as well as leading.

This job description is not intended to be a comprehensive list of the duties and responsibilities of the position. Still Bright provides equal employment opportunities (EEO) to all employees and applicants for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability or genetics. In addition to federal law requirements, Still Bright complies with applicable state and local laws governing nondiscrimination in employment in every location in which the company has facilities. This policy applies to all terms and conditions of employment, including recruiting, hiring, placement, promotion, termination, layoff, recall, transfer, leaves of absence, compensation and training.

Still Bright expressly prohibits and will never tolerate any form of workplace harassment based on race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, national origin, age, genetic information, disability, or veteran status. Still Bright especially encourages applicants from historically marginalized communities to join our mission of sustainable metals extraction.

#J-18808-Ljbffr