1

Peer Reviewer Jobs in Michigan (NOW HIRING)

Demonstrated skill in reviewing the work of others--through peer review, supervision, dissertation committees, or group seminars. * Exceptional written communication skills with the ability to convey ...

Senior Scientific Reviewer - Physics

Warren, MI ยท On-site +1

$80 - $150/hr

Demonstrated skill in reviewing the work of others--through peer review, supervision, dissertation committees, or group seminars. * Exceptional written communication skills with the ability to convey ...

Peer mentors help staff promote social and academic success and aid in student engagement efforts ... reviewed upon receipt, and the position will be pulled down when vacancies are filled Quick Link ...

$15.75 - $20.50/hr

Easterseals MORC is hiring for a Certified Peer Support Specialist to help make a difference and ... For further information, please review the Know Your Rights notice from the Department of Labor.

$15.75 - $20.50/hr

Easterseals MORC is hiring for a Certified Peer Support Specialist to help make a difference and ... For further information, please review the Know Your Rights notice from the Department of Labor.

Peer Recovery Coach

Alpena, MI

$15 - $19.50/hr

Peer Recovery Coach Job ID: A26-086 Location: Alpena About Our Family: Established in 1978, Alcona ... Continuously review charts for new and/or relevant information concerning clients. e. Communicates ...

Peer Recovery Coach

Alpena, MI ยท On-site

$15 - $19.50/hr

Peer Recovery Coach Job ID: A26-086 Location: Alpena About Our Family: Established in 1978, Alcona ... Continuously review charts for new and/or relevant information concerning clients. e. Communicates ...

Showing results 21-40

Peer Reviewer information

See Michigan salary details

$9

$17

$26

How much do peer reviewer jobs pay per hour?

As of Aug 22, 2026, the average hourly pay for peer reviewer in Michigan is $17.79, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $15.10 and $19.47 per hour, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What is a peer reviewer?

Peer reviewers are experts in a specific academic or professional field who evaluate the quality, validity, and relevance of scholarly articles, research papers, or grant applications before they are published or funded. Their role is to provide constructive feedback, ensure the integrity of the work, and help maintain high standards within their discipline. Peer reviewers are usually volunteers and their assessments help editors or funding bodies make informed decisions about the work's suitability for publication or support.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as a peer reviewer?

To thrive as a Peer Reviewer, you need subject matter expertise, strong analytical skills, and a background in research or academia, often demonstrated by an advanced degree or relevant publications. Familiarity with online manuscript submission systems, plagiarism detection tools, and journal-specific guidelines is typically required. Attention to detail, objectivity, and clear written communication are essential soft skills for providing constructive feedback. These abilities ensure the integrity, quality, and advancement of scholarly work within the peer review process.

What are some common challenges faced by peer reviewers, and how can they effectively manage their workload?

Peer Reviewers often encounter challenges such as tight deadlines, managing multiple manuscripts at once, and ensuring impartiality in their evaluations. Balancing these responsibilities with other professional commitments can be demanding. To manage their workload effectively, it's important for Peer Reviewers to communicate availability clearly with editors, set realistic expectations, and allocate dedicated time for thorough reviews. Developing a structured review process and staying updated on best practices in peer review can also help maintain quality and efficiency.

What is the difference between Peer Reviewer vs Journal Editor?

AspectPeer ReviewerJournal Editor
Required CredentialsTypically advanced degrees in the field, expertise in the subject areaAdvanced degrees, editorial experience, often with additional qualifications in publishing or editing
Work EnvironmentAcademic or research institutions, publishing companies, freelanceAcademic journals, publishing houses, research organizations
Employer & Industry UsageUsed by academic journals, conferences, research institutionsUsed by academic journals, publishing companies, scholarly organizations
Common Search & Comparison IntentUnderstanding roles in peer review process, qualifications neededUnderstanding editorial responsibilities, differences from peer review

Peer Reviewers evaluate submitted research for quality and validity, providing feedback to editors. Journal Editors oversee the entire publication process, make final decisions, and manage peer reviewers. While both roles require expertise in the field, editors have additional responsibilities in managing the publication workflow. Understanding these differences helps clarify career paths and roles within academic publishing.

Do peer reviewers get paid?

Peer reviewers are typically volunteers who review academic papers or research proposals without compensation. However, in some professional or industry contexts, peer reviewers may receive payment or honoraria for their evaluations, especially when reviewing for journals or conferences that offer stipends or incentives. Payment practices vary depending on the organization and the specific review process involved.

How to become a paid peer reviewer?

To become a paid peer reviewer, individuals typically need relevant expertise in the subject area, a strong academic or professional background, and experience in reviewing or editing. Many journals and organizations pay peer reviewers, often requiring registration or application through their submission portals. Building a reputation through volunteering or publishing can also lead to paid reviewing opportunities.
Infographic showing various Peer Reviewer job openings in Michigan as of August 2026, with employment types broken down into 1% As Needed, 29% Full Time, 65% Part Time, 2% Temporary, 2% Contract, and 1% Nights. Highlights an 97% Physical, 1% Hybrid, and 2% Remote job distribution, with an average salary of $37,001 per year, or $17.8 per hour.

Senior Scientific Reviewer - Physics

micro1 AI

Lansing, MI โ€ข On-site, Remote

$80 - $150/hr

Part-time

Posted 20 days ago


Job description

Role Title: Physics Expert (Postdoc / Junior professor)


Role Type: Contractor


Location: Remote (US, Canada, UK focused)


micro1 is engaging Physics Experts (Postdoc / Junior professor) to participate in a high-impact project supporting a customer in the science and technology sector. In this role, you'll apply your expertise to help train next-generation AI systems. Your work will shape how models learn, reason, and perform through high-quality, real-world input. No prior experience in AI is required โ€” your domain knowledge is what matters.


Scope of Work

  1. Critically evaluate and review physics solutions, mathematical derivations, and theoretical arguments generated by researchers or AI platforms.
  2. Detect errors, unjustified steps, missing assumptions, dimensional inconsistencies, and weaknesses in logic or methodology.
  3. Delineate between substantive scientific issues and stylistic or cosmetic matters, providing technically precise written feedback.
  4. Articulate and document the reasoning behind any identified flaws, ensuring actionable guidance for improvement.
  5. Recognize when correct reasoning can be optimized, and offer suggestions to sharpen or clarify the argument.
  6. Utilize LaTeX, SymPy, Python, and Jupyter to independently verify or counter-check scientific claims as appropriate.
  7. Deliver structured feedback designed to support iterative enhancement of submitted work and project outcomes.


Preferred Qualifications

  1. PhD in physics and an active record of independent research within a specialized subfield (e.g., High Energy/Mathematical Physics, Biophysics/Statistical Physics, Condensed Matter, AMO/Quantum Optics, Gravitation/Cosmology, Quantum Information, or Optical Materials).
  2. Experience as a postdoctoral researcher, research fellow, junior/assistant professor, or senior research scientist.
  3. Recent (last ~5 years) representative publications in the relevant subfield, with arXiv or DOI links.
  4. Advanced proficiency with LaTeX, SymPy, Python, and Jupyter for theoretical modeling and computational validation.
  5. Demonstrated skill in reviewing the work of othersโ€”through peer review, supervision, dissertation committees, or group seminars.
  6. Exceptional written communication skills with the ability to convey nuanced, constructive feedback with technical rigor.
  7. Reliable access to high-speed internet and a computer suitable for rigorous technical work.