ZipRecruiter

Log In

1

Medical Content Review Jobs (NOW HIRING)

Ro

Medical Content Reviewer

New York, NY · On-site +1

... content for medical accuracy. This person will help ensure content published on Ro's digital ... Your role will be to review at least 2-4 articles (new pieces + updates) per week and provide ...

Ro

Medical Content Reviewer

New York, NY · Remote

... content for medical accuracy. This person will help ensure content published on Ro's digital ... Your role will be to review at least 2-4 articles (new pieces + updates) per week and provide ...

Ro

Medical Content Reviewer

New York, NY

... content for medical accuracy. This person will help ensure content published on Ro's digital ... Your role will be to review at least 2-4 articles (new pieces + updates) per week and provide ...

Takeda

SrMgr, Medical Content SME

Lexington, MA

$151K - $237K/yr

Medical review and compliance oversight:Ensure clear review pathways, predictable timelines, and accountability for the approvaland dissemination of medical content * Agile delivery and workflow ...

Everlywell

Medical Content Specialist (Contract)

$45 - $55/hr

Reviewing and updating existing content for clinical accuracy, health literacy, and alignment with ... Familiarity with medical terminology, regulatory guidelines (e.g., FDA), and clinical references ...

Mindlance

Project Manager

North Chicago, IL

Job Title - Project Manager Location: North Chicago, IL Duration: 6 months - based on performance and business needs Key Requirements: * 3-5 years of project management experience with a bachelor ...

next page

Showing results 1-20

All JobsMedical Content Review Jobs

Medical Content Review information

See salary details

$15

$38

$77

How much do medical content review jobs pay per hour?

As of Jun 14, 2026, the average hourly pay for medical content review in the United States is $38.91, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $26.20 and $45.19 per hour, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What are some common challenges faced in a Medical Content Review role, and how can they be addressed?

One common challenge in Medical Content Review is ensuring accuracy and compliance with the latest medical guidelines while working within tight deadlines. Reviewers must stay up-to-date with constantly evolving regulations and scientific literature, which requires continuous learning and attention to detail. Effective collaboration with medical writers, subject matter experts, and legal teams can help address potential discrepancies or unclear messaging. Leveraging standardized checklists and clear communication channels also helps maintain quality and consistency across all reviewed content.

What is medical content review?

Medical content review is the process of evaluating medical or healthcare-related materials, such as articles, advertisements, or educational resources, to ensure they are accurate, compliant with regulations, and clear for the intended audience. Medical content reviewers check for scientific accuracy, proper use of medical terminology, and adherence to legal and ethical standards. This role is essential in maintaining the credibility and safety of information distributed to healthcare professionals and the public.

What is the difference between Medical Content Review vs Medical Writer?

AspectMedical Content ReviewMedical Writer
Primary RoleReviewing and validating medical content for accuracy and complianceCreating, drafting, and editing medical content and documents
Required CredentialsMedical background, often with healthcare or clinical experienceMedical or scientific degree, strong writing skills
Work EnvironmentPharmaceutical companies, medical communication agencies, regulatory bodiesPharmaceutical companies, medical publishing, marketing teams
FocusEnsuring content accuracy and regulatory complianceProducing clear, engaging, and scientifically accurate content

Medical Content Review and Medical Writer roles both require a strong medical background, but differ in focus. Reviewers primarily verify content accuracy and compliance, while writers focus on creating and editing medical documents. Both roles are essential in the medical communication industry and often collaborate to produce high-quality medical content.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as a Medical Content Reviewer, and why are they important?

To thrive as a Medical Content Reviewer, you need a strong background in life sciences or medicine, excellent research skills, and attention to detail, usually backed by relevant degrees or certifications. Familiarity with medical databases, reference management tools, and content management systems is typically required. Strong analytical thinking, effective communication, and the ability to interpret complex scientific information are crucial soft skills in this role. These competencies ensure the accuracy, clarity, and reliability of medical content, which is vital for maintaining trust and compliance in healthcare communications.
More about Medical Content Review jobs
What cities are hiring for Medical Content Review jobs? Cities with the most Medical Content Review job openings:
What states have the most Medical Content Review jobs? States with the most job openings for Medical Content Review jobs include:
What job categories do people searching Medical Content Review jobs look for? The top searched job categories for Medical Content Review jobs are:
Medical Content Review jobs near you
Medical Content Reviewer

Medical Content Reviewer

Ro

New York, NY • On-site, Remote

Contractor

Posted 28 days ago

Job description

About the Role
This role is for an Independent Contractor who will provide services to Ro and will be paid on invoice (1099).
We are looking for a physician (MD/DO) who has experience reviewing consumer-facing content for medical accuracy. This person will help ensure content published on Ro's digital publication, Health Guide, is educational, trustworthy, and meets high-quality, clinical standards. Articles range from ~1,500-2,500 words, on average, and are primarily related to weight loss, GLP-1s, erectile dysfunction, and sexual health. Your role will be to review at least 2-4 articles (new pieces + updates) per week and provide feedback to editors.Your name will be listed as the medical reviewer at the top of articles you've reviewed and will link to a bio page. This person will work directly with Ro's Health SEO Editor.
You will:
  • Review articles for Health Guide for medical accuracy, evidence, and completeness - at least ~2-4 articles (new pieces + updates) per week
  • Fact-check articles for Health Guide; verify medical data, statistics, and citations against reputable sources
  • Ensure citations are in alignment with our internal medical research guidelines and citation requirements
  • Familiarize yourself with all Health Guide style guides and refer to them while reviewing content; ultimately become well-versed in the publication's style, tone, and SEO/editorial best practices
  • Note your edits and comments in Suggesting mode on Google Docs and respond to questions from editors as needed
  • Communicate with editors and keep track of your progress in our project management platform, Monday
  • Submit a personal bio and photo to be published on the Ro website

You have:
  • MD or DO (required)
  • A license to practice medicine in the United States from a U.S. based medical school (required)
  • 3+ years of experience medically reviewing consumer-facing medical content for accuracy and completeness

Preferred qualifications:
  • Specialty in urology, men's health, obesity medicine, and/or internal medicine
  • Effective research skills and familiarity with research databases such as PubMed
  • Medical knowledge related to weight loss (incl. GLP-1s), erectile dysfunction (incl. PDE5 inhibitors), and sexual health
  • Basic understanding of SEO/AEO principles
  • Basic understanding of editorial processes
  • Familiarity with Google Docs

We may use automated tools, including artificial intelligence (AI), to assist with parts of our recruiting and hiring process, such as reviewing applications, evaluating resumes, and assessing responses or job-related qualifications. These tools are used to support our recruitment team and do not replace human judgment. Final hiring decisions are made by humans.

Apply