1

Scientific Reviewer Jobs in Raleigh, NC (NOW HIRING)

... science and technology sector. In this role, you'll apply your expertise to help train next ... Critically evaluate and review physics solutions, mathematical derivations, and theoretical ...

... science and technology sector. In this role, you'll apply your expertise to help train next ... Critically evaluate and review physics solutions, mathematical derivations, and theoretical ...

Medical & Scientific Review: Provide rigorous medical oversight for the review and approval of promotional and scientific materials in strict compliance with U.S. regulatory standards and corporate ...

Science Writer

Raleigh, NC · On-site

$65K - $75K/yr

... the scientific community. Wolfpack Perks and Benefits As a Pack member, you belong here, and can ... As you consider this opportunity, we encourage you to review our Employee Value Proposition and ...

next page

Showing results 1-20

Scientific Reviewer information

See Raleigh, NC salary details

$10

$29

$47

How much do scientific reviewer jobs pay per hour?

As of Aug 22, 2026, the average hourly pay for scientific reviewer in Raleigh, NC is $29.05, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $21.97 and $35.53 per hour, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What is a scientific reviewer?

A Scientific Reviewer evaluates scientific data, research findings, and technical documents to ensure accuracy, validity, and compliance with regulations or standards. They often work in regulatory agencies, journals, or research organizations, assessing study methodologies, experimental results, and conclusions. Their role is critical in maintaining scientific integrity and ensuring that published or approved research meets established guidelines. Additionally, they may provide recommendations for improvements or further studies based on their evaluations.

What are the typical daily responsibilities of a scientific reviewer?

On a typical day, a Scientific Reviewer evaluates submitted scientific manuscripts, grant proposals, or research protocols for validity, originality, and adherence to ethical standards. They often collaborate with editors, fellow reviewers, and sometimes authors to provide constructive feedback and recommend acceptance, revision, or rejection of submissions. Responsibilities might also include checking data accuracy, reviewing statistical methodologies, and keeping up with current developments in one’s field. This role requires balancing rigorous analysis with clear written communication to support the advancement of quality research.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as a scientific reviewer?

To thrive as a Scientific Reviewer, you need a robust background in scientific research, critical analysis, and attention to detail, usually supported by an advanced degree in a scientific discipline. Familiarity with manuscript management systems, statistical analysis software, and databases like PubMed or Web of Science is common. Excellent communication, impartiality, and time management skills help set top Scientific Reviewers apart. These capabilities ensure thorough, objective evaluation of scientific work and timely collaboration within the review process.

What are the most commonly searched types of Scientific Reviewer jobs in Raleigh, NC?

The most popular types of Scientific Reviewer jobs in Raleigh, NC are:

What are popular job titles related to Scientific Reviewer jobs in Raleigh, NC?

For Scientific Reviewer jobs in Raleigh, NC, the most frequently searched job titles are:

What job categories do people searching Scientific Reviewer jobs in Raleigh, NC look for?

The top searched job categories for Scientific Reviewer jobs in Raleigh, NC are:

Infographic showing various Scientific Reviewer job openings in Raleigh, NC as of August 2026, with employment types broken down into 1% Internship, 1% As Needed, 78% Full Time, 17% Part Time, and 3% Contract. Highlights an 78% Physical, 3% Hybrid, and 19% Remote job distribution, with an average salary of $60,424 per year, or $29.1 per hour.

Senior Scientific Reviewer - Physics

micro1 AI

Cary, NC • On-site, Remote

$80 - $150/hr

Part-time

Posted 19 days ago


Job description

Role Title: Physics Expert (Postdoc / Junior professor)


Role Type: Contractor


Location: Remote (US, Canada, UK focused)


micro1 is engaging Physics Experts (Postdoc / Junior professor) to participate in a high-impact project supporting a customer in the science and technology sector. In this role, you'll apply your expertise to help train next-generation AI systems. Your work will shape how models learn, reason, and perform through high-quality, real-world input. No prior experience in AI is required — your domain knowledge is what matters.


Scope of Work

  1. Critically evaluate and review physics solutions, mathematical derivations, and theoretical arguments generated by researchers or AI platforms.
  2. Detect errors, unjustified steps, missing assumptions, dimensional inconsistencies, and weaknesses in logic or methodology.
  3. Delineate between substantive scientific issues and stylistic or cosmetic matters, providing technically precise written feedback.
  4. Articulate and document the reasoning behind any identified flaws, ensuring actionable guidance for improvement.
  5. Recognize when correct reasoning can be optimized, and offer suggestions to sharpen or clarify the argument.
  6. Utilize LaTeX, SymPy, Python, and Jupyter to independently verify or counter-check scientific claims as appropriate.
  7. Deliver structured feedback designed to support iterative enhancement of submitted work and project outcomes.


Preferred Qualifications

  1. PhD in physics and an active record of independent research within a specialized subfield (e.g., High Energy/Mathematical Physics, Biophysics/Statistical Physics, Condensed Matter, AMO/Quantum Optics, Gravitation/Cosmology, Quantum Information, or Optical Materials).
  2. Experience as a postdoctoral researcher, research fellow, junior/assistant professor, or senior research scientist.
  3. Recent (last ~5 years) representative publications in the relevant subfield, with arXiv or DOI links.
  4. Advanced proficiency with LaTeX, SymPy, Python, and Jupyter for theoretical modeling and computational validation.
  5. Demonstrated skill in reviewing the work of others—through peer review, supervision, dissertation committees, or group seminars.
  6. Exceptional written communication skills with the ability to convey nuanced, constructive feedback with technical rigor.
  7. Reliable access to high-speed internet and a computer suitable for rigorous technical work.