ZipRecruiter

Log In

1

Reviewer Jobs in Alabama (NOW HIRING)

Manulife

$73K - $122K/yr

The Suitability Review Specialist is responsible for reviewing new business submissions and replacement transactions involving annuity and life insurance products to ensure compliance with regulatory ...

Birmingham

Quality Review Coordinator

Birmingham, AL · On-site

The Medical Review Unit develops, implements, and administers programs such as Medical Review and Preferred Medical Doctor, to determine medical necessity of services and impact cost savings.

previous page

Showing results 41-60

All JobsReviewer JobsReviewer Jobs in Alabama

Reviewer information

See Alabama salary details

$9

$27

$44

How much do reviewer jobs pay per hour?

As of Aug 17, 2026, the average hourly pay for reviewer in Alabama is $27.09, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $20.48 and $33.12 per hour, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as a reviewer, and why are they important?

A successful Reviewer needs strong analytical thinking, attention to detail, and expertise in the relevant subject area, often supported by a degree or professional background. Familiarity with review management software, submission tracking systems, and industry-specific guidelines is commonly required. Excellent written communication, objectivity, and time management set outstanding reviewers apart. These skills ensure thorough, fair, and timely evaluations, which uphold the quality and credibility of published work or products.

How do reviewers typically collaborate with other team members during the evaluation process?

Reviewers often work closely with subject matter experts, editors, or project managers to ensure that evaluations are thorough and consistent. Collaboration usually involves regular meetings to discuss criteria, clarify expectations, and address any ambiguities in the material under review. Additionally, Reviewers may provide feedback or suggestions for improvement and participate in group discussions to achieve consensus on final recommendations. This teamwork helps maintain high standards and ensures the integrity of the review process.

What is the difference between Reviewer vs Quality Control Inspector?

AspectReviewerQuality Control Inspector
CredentialsTypically requires a degree or certification in the relevant fieldOften requires technical training or certification in inspection methods
Work EnvironmentOffice or remote review settings, analyzing documents or dataManufacturing, construction, or production sites inspecting products
Employer & IndustryPublishing, media, manufacturing, or software companiesManufacturing, construction, aerospace, or automotive industries
Search & Comparison IntentUnderstanding review roles, responsibilities, and qualificationsComparing inspection and quality assurance roles in industry

While both reviewers and quality control inspectors ensure standards are met, reviewers primarily evaluate documents, data, or content in office settings, focusing on accuracy and compliance. Quality control inspectors physically examine products or processes on-site to identify defects or issues. Their roles overlap in quality assurance but differ in work environment and specific tasks.

How to get a job as a reviewer?

To become a reviewer, gain relevant knowledge in the subject area, develop strong communication and critical thinking skills, and build a portfolio of reviews or sample work. Many reviewer roles require attention to detail, familiarity with review platforms or tools, and sometimes specific certifications or experience depending on the industry. Applying through company websites, freelance platforms, or industry-specific job boards can help find opportunities.

What is a reviewer?

Reviewers are individuals who evaluate and provide feedback on various works, such as academic papers, products, services, or creative projects. Their main role is to assess the quality, accuracy, and relevance of the material, offering constructive criticism and recommendations for improvement. Reviewers are essential in maintaining standards and ensuring that only high-quality works are published or made available to the public. The specific responsibilities of a reviewer can vary depending on the industry or context in which they work.

What are the most commonly searched types of Reviewer jobs in Alabama?

The most popular types of Reviewer jobs in Alabama are:

What are popular job titles related to Reviewer jobs in Alabama?

For Reviewer jobs in Alabama, the most frequently searched job titles are:

What cities in Alabama are hiring for Reviewer jobs?

Cities in Alabama with the most Reviewer job openings:

What are popular job titles related to Reviewer jobs in AL?

For Reviewer jobs in AL, the most frequently searched job titles are:

Reviewer jobs near you
Infographic showing various Reviewer job openings in Alabama as of August 2026, with employment types broken down into 100% Full Time. Highlights an 100% In-person job distribution, with an average salary of $56,340 per year, or $27.1 per hour.

Principal Research Scientist - (Physics) AI Reviewer

micro1 AI

Tuscaloosa, AL • Remote

$80 - $160/hr

Part-time

Posted 14 days ago

Job description

Role Title: Physics Expert (Professor / Principal Investigator)


Role Type: Contractor.


Location: Remote


micro1 is engaging Physics Experts—established Professors or Principal Investigators—to provide high-level domain guidance as part of an impactful project for a customer. In this role, you'll apply your expertise to help train next-generation AI systems. Your work will shape how models learn, reason, and perform through high-quality, real-world input. No prior experience in AI is required — your domain knowledge is what matters.


Scope of Work

  1. Adjudicate and render expert judgment on contested or competing physics arguments, solutions, or interpretations within your subfield.
  2. Compare alternative approaches to the same problem, detailing which is superior, under what assumptions, and in which regimes.
  3. Identify and articulate meta-level criteria for evaluating the robustness and validity of competing physics work, such as key assumptions and breaking points of approximations.
  4. Exercise calibrated confidence by providing authoritative assessments while transparently acknowledging genuine uncertainty or open questions in the field.
  5. Draft defensible written evaluations suitable for review by fellow senior physicists, ensuring clarity and rigor.
  6. Leverage technical tools such as LaTeX, SymPy, Python, and Jupyter to verify or contrast technical claims as needed.
  7. Clearly communicate when a question is unresolved within the field and delineate the pertinent considerations.


Preferred Qualifications

  1. PhD in physics with demonstrated expertise and scholarly impact in your specified subfield.
  2. Current or former Associate Professor, Full Professor, Chair Professor, or Principal Investigator/Group Leader with a track record of independent research leadership.
  3. Ongoing research activity in one or more of these areas: High Energy Physics, Mathematical Physics, Biophysics, Statistical Physics, Condensed Matter, AMO/Quantum Optics, Gravitation, Cosmology, Astrophysics, Quantum Information, or Optical Properties of Materials.
  4. 3–5 recent representative publications in your target subfield, with arXiv or DOI references.
  5. Prior experience supervising PhD students or postdocs, or equivalent leadership in industry research settings.
  6. Proficiency with LaTeX, SymPy, Python, and Jupyter (please indicate any gaps in experience with these tools).
  7. Exceptional written communication skills, with the ability to articulate nuanced and well-reasoned judgments.

Apply