... • Fact-Checking: identify issues and inaccuracies where the graphical abstract does not ... with AI-related training or evaluation tasks • A background in scientific publishing or peer ...
... • Fact-Checking: identify issues and inaccuracies where the graphical abstract does not ... with AI-related training or evaluation tasks • A background in scientific publishing or peer ...
... • Fact-Checking: identify issues and inaccuracies where the graphical abstract does not ... AI-related training or evaluation tasks • Background in scientific publishing or peer review ...
... • Fact-Checking: identify issues and inaccuracies where the graphical abstract does not ... AI-related training or evaluation tasks • Background in scientific publishing or peer review ...
... • Fact-Checking: identify issues and inaccuracies where the graphical abstract does not ... with AI-related training or evaluation tasks • A background in scientific publishing or peer ...
... • Fact-Checking: identify issues and inaccuracies where the graphical abstract does not ... with AI-related training or evaluation tasks • A background in scientific publishing or peer ...
The role involves training and evaluating AI models by reviewing research papers, fact-checking AI outputs, and providing human feedback to enhance AI performance. Responsibilities : • AI ...
The role involves training and evaluating AI models by reviewing research papers, fact-checking AI outputs, and providing human feedback to enhance AI performance. Responsibilities : • AI ...
The role involves training and evaluating AI models by reviewing research papers, fact-checking AI outputs, and providing feedback to enhance AI performance. Responsibilities : • AI Evaluation ...
The role involves training and evaluating AI models by reviewing research papers, fact-checking AI outputs, and providing feedback to enhance AI performance. Responsibilities : • AI Evaluation ...
The role involves training and evaluating AI models by reviewing research papers, fact-checking AI outputs, and providing human feedback for model alignment. Responsibilities : • AI Evaluation ...
The role involves training and evaluating AI models by reviewing research papers, fact-checking AI outputs, and providing human feedback for model alignment. Responsibilities : • AI Evaluation ...
Fact Checker/Editor
Washington, DC · On-site +1
$68K - $80K/yr
Four years of experience fact checking or researching for a newsroom, nonprofit, or other content ... This is a full time, nonexempt, at will position. This position is grant funded for a period of one ...
Fact Checker/Editor
Washington, DC · On-site +1
$68K - $80K/yr
Four years of experience fact checking or researching for a newsroom, nonprofit, or other content ... This is a full time, nonexempt, at will position. This position is grant funded for a period of one ...
Fact Checker/Editor (Remote)
Washington, DC · Remote
$68K - $80K/yr
Four years of experience fact checking or researching for a newsroom, nonprofit, or other content ... This is a full time, nonexempt, at will position. This position is grant funded for a period of one ...
Fact Checker/Editor (Remote)
Washington, DC · Remote
$68K - $80K/yr
Four years of experience fact checking or researching for a newsroom, nonprofit, or other content ... This is a full time, nonexempt, at will position. This position is grant funded for a period of one ...
... Fact-Checking & Validation: ensuring that the outputs generated by AI systems align with professional standards and logical accounting frameworks. • Knowledge Sharing: providing expert feedback to ...
... Fact-Checking & Validation: ensuring that the outputs generated by AI systems align with professional standards and logical accounting frameworks. • Knowledge Sharing: providing expert feedback to ...
... fact-checking tasks • Strong attention to detail Preferred : • Previous experience with AI ... related training or evaluation tasks • Background in scientific publishing or peer review Company
... fact-checking tasks • Strong attention to detail Preferred : • Previous experience with AI ... related training or evaluation tasks • Background in scientific publishing or peer review Company
... Fact-Checking & Validation: ensuring that the outputs generated by AI systems align with professional standards and logical legal frameworks. • Knowledge Sharing: providing expert feedback to help ...
... Fact-Checking & Validation: ensuring that the outputs generated by AI systems align with professional standards and logical legal frameworks. • Knowledge Sharing: providing expert feedback to help ...
... fact-checking tasks • Strong attention to detail Preferred : • Previous experience with AI ... related training or evaluation tasks • Background in scientific publishing or peer review Company
... fact-checking tasks • Strong attention to detail Preferred : • Previous experience with AI ... related training or evaluation tasks • Background in scientific publishing or peer review Company
... Fact-Checking & Validation: ensuring that the outputs generated by AI systems align with professional standards and logical accounting frameworks. • Knowledge Sharing: providing expert feedback to ...
... Fact-Checking & Validation: ensuring that the outputs generated by AI systems align with professional standards and logical accounting frameworks. • Knowledge Sharing: providing expert feedback to ...
... Fact-Checking & Validation: ensuring that the outputs generated by AI systems align with professional standards and logical legal frameworks. • Knowledge Sharing: providing expert feedback to help ...
... Fact-Checking & Validation: ensuring that the outputs generated by AI systems align with professional standards and logical legal frameworks. • Knowledge Sharing: providing expert feedback to help ...
... Fact-Checking & Validation: ensuring that the outputs generated by AI systems align with professional standards and logical accounting frameworks. • Knowledge Sharing: providing expert feedback to ...
... Fact-Checking & Validation: ensuring that the outputs generated by AI systems align with professional standards and logical accounting frameworks. • Knowledge Sharing: providing expert feedback to ...
... Fact-Checking & Validation: ensuring that the outputs generated by AI systems align with professional standards and logical legal frameworks. • Knowledge Sharing: providing expert feedback to help ...
... Fact-Checking & Validation: ensuring that the outputs generated by AI systems align with professional standards and logical legal frameworks. • Knowledge Sharing: providing expert feedback to help ...
... Fact-Checking & Validation: ensuring that the outputs generated by AI systems align with professional standards and logical legal frameworks. • Knowledge Sharing: providing expert feedback to help ...
... Fact-Checking & Validation: ensuring that the outputs generated by AI systems align with professional standards and logical legal frameworks. • Knowledge Sharing: providing expert feedback to help ...
... Fact-Checking & Validation: ensuring that the outputs generated by AI systems align with professional standards and logical legal frameworks. • Knowledge Sharing: providing expert feedback to help ...
... Fact-Checking & Validation: ensuring that the outputs generated by AI systems align with professional standards and logical legal frameworks. • Knowledge Sharing: providing expert feedback to help ...
... Fact-Checking & Validation: ensuring that the outputs generated by AI systems align with professional standards and logical accounting frameworks. • Knowledge Sharing: providing expert feedback to ...
... Fact-Checking & Validation: ensuring that the outputs generated by AI systems align with professional standards and logical accounting frameworks. • Knowledge Sharing: providing expert feedback to ...
They are seeking Legal Subject Matter Experts to help train and evaluate AI models using their professional legal insight, involving tasks such as document evaluation and fact-checking.
They are seeking Legal Subject Matter Experts to help train and evaluate AI models using their professional legal insight, involving tasks such as document evaluation and fact-checking.
Full Time Ai Fact Checking information
See salary details
$21.88 - $25.87
14% of jobs
$25.87 - $29.87
5% of jobs
$30.98 is the 25th percentile. Wages below this are outliers.
$29.87 - $33.87
20% of jobs
$33.87 - $37.87
6% of jobs
The median wage is $38.54 / hr.
$37.87 - $41.87
28% of jobs
$42.14 is the 75th percentile. Wages above this are outliers.
$41.87 - $45.87
27% of jobs
$45.87 - $49.87
0% of jobs
$49.87 - $53.87
0% of jobs
$53.87 - $57.87
0% of jobs
$57.87 - $61.87
0% of jobs
$61.87 - $65.87
0% of jobs
$21
$37
$65
How much do full time ai fact checking jobs pay per hour?
What is the difference between Full Time Ai Fact Checking vs Content Reviewer?
| Aspect | Full Time Ai Fact Checking | Content Reviewer |
|---|---|---|
| Required Credentials | Typically a degree in related field, familiarity with AI tools | High school diploma or equivalent, basic computer skills |
| Work Environment | Office or remote, focused on AI data validation | Office or remote, reviewing various types of content |
| Employer & Industry Usage | Tech companies, AI startups, data annotation firms | Media companies, online platforms, content moderation services |
Full Time Ai Fact Checking involves verifying AI-generated data for accuracy, often requiring technical knowledge of AI tools. Content Reviewers focus on assessing and moderating user-generated content for appropriateness. While both roles may work remotely and require attention to detail, Ai Fact Checkers typically need more specialized credentials and work within tech-focused environments, whereas Content Reviewers handle broader content moderation tasks across various industries.

Job description
Prolific is building a significant pool of quality human data for AI applications. They are seeking Neuroscience Experts to evaluate AI-generated outputs for scientific integrity and accuracy.
Responsibilities:
• Scientific Review: review scientific papers alongside LLM-generated graphical abstracts.
• Fact-Checking: identify issues and inaccuracies where the graphical abstract does not faithfully represent the source scientific paper.
• Expert Verification: use your domain knowledge to ensure that technical concepts are visually and textually summarized correctly.
Qualifications:
Required:
• Deep expertise in Neuroscience
• You must hold a Master's or PhD in Neuroscience or a related field.
• History with fact-checking tasks and strong attention to detail
Preferred:
• Previous experience with AI-related training or evaluation tasks
• A background in scientific publishing or peer review
Company:
Building the most advanced global infrastructure for People Science. Founded in 2014, the company is headquartered in London, GBR, with a team of 51-200 employees. The company is currently Growth Stage.