2

Remote Ai Rating Jobs in Virginia (NOW HIRING)

OWASP AI Testing Guide Location: Remote, with occasional travel to customer sites or TestPros labs ... Rate: $50-80/hr. 1099 or Corp. To Corp.). This range represents a good-faith estimate and is not a ...

next page

Showing results 1-20

Remote Ai Rating information

What is the difference between Remote Ai Rating vs Data Analyst?

AspectRemote Ai RatingData Analyst
Required CredentialsTypically requires AI, machine learning, or data science certificationsRequires degrees in statistics, mathematics, or related fields
Work EnvironmentRemote, often project-based with AI/tech companiesRemote or on-site, across various industries
Industry UsagePrimarily in AI, tech, and data-driven companiesAcross finance, healthcare, marketing, and more
Common Search/ComparisonYesYes

Remote Ai Rating and Data Analyst roles share similarities in requiring analytical skills and remote work options. However, Remote Ai Rating focuses more on AI-specific evaluation and machine learning knowledge, while Data Analysts handle broader data interpretation and reporting across industries.

What are the most commonly searched types of Ai Rating jobs in Virginia?

The most popular types of Ai Rating jobs in Virginia are:

What cities in Virginia are hiring for Remote Ai Rating jobs?

Cities in Virginia with the most Remote Ai Rating job openings:

Infographic showing various Remote Ai Rating job openings in Virginia as of August 2026, with employment types broken down into 100% Contract. Highlights an 100% Remote job distribution.

Senior Physics Domain Specialist - AI Rater

micro1 AI

Suffolk, VA • Remote

$80 - $160/hr

Part-time

Posted 17 days ago


Job description

Role Title: Physics Expert (Professor / Principal Investigator)


Role Type: Contractor.


Location: Remote


micro1 is engaging Physics Experts—established Professors or Principal Investigators—to provide high-level domain guidance as part of an impactful project for a customer. In this role, you'll apply your expertise to help train next-generation AI systems. Your work will shape how models learn, reason, and perform through high-quality, real-world input. No prior experience in AI is required — your domain knowledge is what matters.


Scope of Work

  1. Adjudicate and render expert judgment on contested or competing physics arguments, solutions, or interpretations within your subfield.
  2. Compare alternative approaches to the same problem, detailing which is superior, under what assumptions, and in which regimes.
  3. Identify and articulate meta-level criteria for evaluating the robustness and validity of competing physics work, such as key assumptions and breaking points of approximations.
  4. Exercise calibrated confidence by providing authoritative assessments while transparently acknowledging genuine uncertainty or open questions in the field.
  5. Draft defensible written evaluations suitable for review by fellow senior physicists, ensuring clarity and rigor.
  6. Leverage technical tools such as LaTeX, SymPy, Python, and Jupyter to verify or contrast technical claims as needed.
  7. Clearly communicate when a question is unresolved within the field and delineate the pertinent considerations.


Preferred Qualifications

  1. PhD in physics with demonstrated expertise and scholarly impact in your specified subfield.
  2. Current or former Associate Professor, Full Professor, Chair Professor, or Principal Investigator/Group Leader with a track record of independent research leadership.
  3. Ongoing research activity in one or more of these areas: High Energy Physics, Mathematical Physics, Biophysics, Statistical Physics, Condensed Matter, AMO/Quantum Optics, Gravitation, Cosmology, Astrophysics, Quantum Information, or Optical Properties of Materials.
  4. 3–5 recent representative publications in your target subfield, with arXiv or DOI references.
  5. Prior experience supervising PhD students or postdocs, or equivalent leadership in industry research settings.
  6. Proficiency with LaTeX, SymPy, Python, and Jupyter (please indicate any gaps in experience with these tools).
  7. Exceptional written communication skills, with the ability to articulate nuanced and well-reasoned judgments.