1

Quality Rater Jobs in Augusta, GA (NOW HIRING)

INSTALLER PIECE RATE

Augusta, GA ยท On-site

$13 - $30/hr

Report safety, customer or quality concerns. * Perform warehouse-related duties as required. * Any other duty, task, or responsibilities as assigned. Your Qualifications * Minimum of 18 years of age.

INSTALLER PIECE RATE

Augusta, GA ยท On-site

$13 - $30/hr

Report safety, customer or quality concerns. * Perform warehouse-related duties as required. * Any other duty, task, or responsibilities as assigned. Your Qualifications * Minimum of 18 years of age.

Showing results 21-40

Quality Rater information

See Augusta, GA salary details

$11

$18

$26

How much do quality rater jobs pay per hour?

As of Aug 18, 2026, the average hourly pay for quality rater in Augusta, GA is $18.73, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $16.06 and $20.58 per hour, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What is a quality rater?

Quality Raters are individuals who evaluate the relevance and quality of search engine results based on specific guidelines provided by companies like Google. Their feedback helps improve the accuracy and usefulness of search algorithms, ensuring that users receive the most relevant information. Quality Raters do not directly influence search rankings but provide valuable data that search engines use to refine and update their systems. This role is typically remote and requires attention to detail, critical thinking, and a good understanding of the assigned guidelines.

What skills and qualifications are needed to thrive as a quality rater?

To thrive as a Quality Rater, you need strong analytical skills, attention to detail, and proficiency in the language of the evaluation, often supported by a college degree or equivalent experience. Familiarity with web search engines, content guidelines, and online evaluation platforms is typically required. Excellent time management, adaptability, and objective judgment are key soft skills for delivering consistent and unbiased ratings. These skills and qualities are essential to ensure accurate, high-quality feedback that helps improve search engine algorithms and user experiences.

What challenges do quality raters face in maintaining consistency and objectivity?

Quality Raters often encounter challenges in interpreting and applying detailed guidelines consistently across a wide variety of content. Since the work involves subjective judgment, ensuring objectivity and minimizing personal bias is crucial. Regular updates to guidelines mean that raters need to stay current and adapt quickly to changes. Collaborating with peers through forums or team discussions can help clarify ambiguities, but raters must ultimately rely on their own understanding to make fair assessments. Mastering this balance is key to long-term success in the role.

What is the difference between Quality Rater vs Content Moderator?

AspectQuality RaterContent Moderator
Required CredentialsHigh school diploma or equivalent; sometimes a degree in related fieldsHigh school diploma or equivalent; sometimes specialized training
Work EnvironmentRemote, flexible hours, independent workRemote or on-site, may involve shift work
Employer & Industry UsageTech companies, search engines, advertising platformsSocial media platforms, online marketplaces, forums
Work FocusEvaluating search results and content relevanceMonitoring and removing inappropriate or harmful content

While both roles involve online content evaluation, Quality Raters primarily assess search engine results for relevance and quality, whereas Content Moderators focus on monitoring and removing harmful or inappropriate content to ensure platform safety. The roles share similar skills and work environments but differ in their specific focus and employer usage.

What qualifications do you need to be a quality rater?

To be a quality rater, candidates typically need a high school diploma or equivalent, strong analytical skills, and familiarity with internet search engines and online content. Some positions may require fluency in the language of the work and the ability to follow detailed guidelines and instructions.

What are popular job titles related to Quality Rater jobs in Augusta, GA?

For Quality Rater jobs in Augusta, GA, the most frequently searched job titles are:

What job categories do people searching Quality Rater jobs in Augusta, GA look for?

The top searched job categories for Quality Rater jobs in Augusta, GA are:

What cities near Augusta, GA are hiring for Quality Rater jobs?

Cities near Augusta, GA with the most Quality Rater job openings:

Infographic showing various Quality Rater job openings in Augusta, GA as of August 2026, with employment types broken down into 1% As Needed, 79% Full Time, 14% Part Time, 5% Contract, and 1% Nights. Highlights an 88% Physical, 2% Hybrid, and 10% Remote job distribution, with an average salary of $38,966 per year, or $18.7 per hour.

Senior Physics Domain Specialist - AI Rater

micro1 AI

Augusta, GA โ€ข Remote

$80 - $160/hr

Part-time

Posted 15 days ago


Job description

Role Title: Physics Expert (Professor / Principal Investigator)


Role Type: Contractor.


Location: Remote


micro1 is engaging Physics Expertsโ€”established Professors or Principal Investigatorsโ€”to provide high-level domain guidance as part of an impactful project for a customer. In this role, you'll apply your expertise to help train next-generation AI systems. Your work will shape how models learn, reason, and perform through high-quality, real-world input. No prior experience in AI is required โ€” your domain knowledge is what matters.


Scope of Work

  1. Adjudicate and render expert judgment on contested or competing physics arguments, solutions, or interpretations within your subfield.
  2. Compare alternative approaches to the same problem, detailing which is superior, under what assumptions, and in which regimes.
  3. Identify and articulate meta-level criteria for evaluating the robustness and validity of competing physics work, such as key assumptions and breaking points of approximations.
  4. Exercise calibrated confidence by providing authoritative assessments while transparently acknowledging genuine uncertainty or open questions in the field.
  5. Draft defensible written evaluations suitable for review by fellow senior physicists, ensuring clarity and rigor.
  6. Leverage technical tools such as LaTeX, SymPy, Python, and Jupyter to verify or contrast technical claims as needed.
  7. Clearly communicate when a question is unresolved within the field and delineate the pertinent considerations.


Preferred Qualifications

  1. PhD in physics with demonstrated expertise and scholarly impact in your specified subfield.
  2. Current or former Associate Professor, Full Professor, Chair Professor, or Principal Investigator/Group Leader with a track record of independent research leadership.
  3. Ongoing research activity in one or more of these areas: High Energy Physics, Mathematical Physics, Biophysics, Statistical Physics, Condensed Matter, AMO/Quantum Optics, Gravitation, Cosmology, Astrophysics, Quantum Information, or Optical Properties of Materials.
  4. 3โ€“5 recent representative publications in your target subfield, with arXiv or DOI references.
  5. Prior experience supervising PhD students or postdocs, or equivalent leadership in industry research settings.
  6. Proficiency with LaTeX, SymPy, Python, and Jupyter (please indicate any gaps in experience with these tools).
  7. Exceptional written communication skills, with the ability to articulate nuanced and well-reasoned judgments.