ZipRecruiter

Log In

1

Peer Reviewer Jobs in Oregon (NOW HIRING)

Grant Engine

As such, we seek the most accomplished, broad-thinking, experienced scientists and product-development experts to serve as peer reviewers in Grant Engine's Expert Review™. Grant Engine is focused ...

New Narrative

Peer Supervisor

Beaverton, OR · On-site

$62K/yr

Reviews documentation, IRs, and performance, and provides clear and direct feedback to support best ... Peer Support Duties: * May provide direct support to participants as well as coaching and oversight ...

Oregon Health & Science University

Peer Tutor

Monmouth, OR · On-site

$11.50 - $15/hr

Peer Tutors are responsible for providing academic assistance to undergraduate students in select ... Review and abide by the Tutoring Code of Ethics * Work with students in both group and individual ...

Oregon Health & Science University

Peer Tutor

Monmouth, OR · On-site

$11.50 - $15/hr

Peer Tutors are responsible for providing academic assistance to undergraduate students in select ... Review and abide by the Tutoring Code of Ethics * Work with students in both group and individual ...

Oregon Health & Science University

Peer Tutor

Monmouth, OR · On-site

$11.50 - $15/hr

Department Overview Peer Tutors are responsible for providing academic assistance to undergraduate ... Review and abide by the Tutoring Code of Ethics * Work with students in both group and individual ...

Oregon Health & Science University

Peer Tutor

Monmouth, OR · On-site

$11.50 - $15/hr

Department Overview Peer Tutors are responsible for providing academic assistance to undergraduate ... Review and abide by the Tutoring Code of Ethics * Work with students in both group and individual ...

Oregon Health & Science University

Peer Tutor

Monmouth, OR · On-site

$11.50 - $15/hr

Department Overview Peer Tutors are responsible for providing academic assistance to undergraduate ... Review and abide by the Tutoring Code of Ethics * Work with students in both group and individual ...

Oregon Health & Science University

Peer Tutor

Monmouth, OR · On-site

$11.50 - $15/hr

Department Overview Peer Tutors are responsible for providing academic assistance to undergraduate ... Review and abide by the Tutoring Code of Ethics * Work with students in both group and individual ...

Oregon Health & Science University

Peer Tutor

Portland, OR · On-site

$12.50 - $16.50/hr

Peer Tutors work under department supervision to support fellow students in mastering a specific ... Prepare and organize tutoring materials, practice problems, or review guides. * Track and report ...

Oregon Health & Science University

Peer Tutor

Portland, OR · On-site

$12.50 - $16.50/hr

Department Overview Peer Tutors work under department supervision to support fellow students in ... Prepare and organize tutoring materials, practice problems, or review guides. * Track and report ...

Oregon Health & Science University

Peer Tutor

Portland, OR

$12.50 - $16.50/hr

Department Overview Peer Tutors work under department supervision to support fellow students in ... Prepare and organize tutoring materials, practice problems, or review guides. * Track and report ...

Oregon Health & Science University

Peer Tutor

Portland, OR · On-site

$12.50 - $16.50/hr

Department Overview Peer Tutors work under department supervision to support fellow students in ... Prepare and organize tutoring materials, practice problems, or review guides. * Track and report ...

Oregonstate

College of Engineering Peer Tutor

Corvallis, OR · On-site

$12.25 - $16/hr

OSU will conduct a review of the National Sex Offender Public website prior to hire. Note:All job ... Peer Tutors serve as student leaders and learning partners, helping fellow engineering students ...

next page

Showing results 1-20

All JobsPeer Reviewer JobsPeer Reviewer Jobs in Oregon

Peer Reviewer information

See Oregon salary details

$10

$21

$32

How much do peer reviewer jobs pay per hour?

As of Aug 30, 2026, the average hourly pay for peer reviewer in Oregon is $21.58, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $18.32 and $23.65 per hour, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What is a peer reviewer?

Peer reviewers are experts in a specific academic or professional field who evaluate the quality, validity, and relevance of scholarly articles, research papers, or grant applications before they are published or funded. Their role is to provide constructive feedback, ensure the integrity of the work, and help maintain high standards within their discipline. Peer reviewers are usually volunteers and their assessments help editors or funding bodies make informed decisions about the work's suitability for publication or support.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as a peer reviewer?

To thrive as a Peer Reviewer, you need subject matter expertise, strong analytical skills, and a background in research or academia, often demonstrated by an advanced degree or relevant publications. Familiarity with online manuscript submission systems, plagiarism detection tools, and journal-specific guidelines is typically required. Attention to detail, objectivity, and clear written communication are essential soft skills for providing constructive feedback. These abilities ensure the integrity, quality, and advancement of scholarly work within the peer review process.

What are some common challenges faced by peer reviewers, and how can they effectively manage their workload?

Peer Reviewers often encounter challenges such as tight deadlines, managing multiple manuscripts at once, and ensuring impartiality in their evaluations. Balancing these responsibilities with other professional commitments can be demanding. To manage their workload effectively, it's important for Peer Reviewers to communicate availability clearly with editors, set realistic expectations, and allocate dedicated time for thorough reviews. Developing a structured review process and staying updated on best practices in peer review can also help maintain quality and efficiency.

What is the difference between Peer Reviewer vs Journal Editor?

AspectPeer ReviewerJournal Editor
Required CredentialsTypically advanced degrees in the field, expertise in the subject areaAdvanced degrees, editorial experience, often with additional qualifications in publishing or editing
Work EnvironmentAcademic or research institutions, publishing companies, freelanceAcademic journals, publishing houses, research organizations
Employer & Industry UsageUsed by academic journals, conferences, research institutionsUsed by academic journals, publishing companies, scholarly organizations
Common Search & Comparison IntentUnderstanding roles in peer review process, qualifications neededUnderstanding editorial responsibilities, differences from peer review

Peer Reviewers evaluate submitted research for quality and validity, providing feedback to editors. Journal Editors oversee the entire publication process, make final decisions, and manage peer reviewers. While both roles require expertise in the field, editors have additional responsibilities in managing the publication workflow. Understanding these differences helps clarify career paths and roles within academic publishing.

Do peer reviewers get paid?

Peer reviewers are typically volunteers who review academic papers or research proposals without compensation. However, in some professional or industry contexts, peer reviewers may receive payment or honoraria for their evaluations, especially when reviewing for journals or conferences that offer stipends or incentives. Payment practices vary depending on the organization and the specific review process involved.

How to become a paid peer reviewer?

To become a paid peer reviewer, individuals typically need relevant expertise in the subject area, a strong academic or professional background, and experience in reviewing or editing. Many journals and organizations pay peer reviewers, often requiring registration or application through their submission portals. Building a reputation through volunteering or publishing can also lead to paid reviewing opportunities.

What are popular job titles related to Peer Reviewer jobs in Oregon?

For Peer Reviewer jobs in Oregon, the most frequently searched job titles are:

What job categories do people searching Peer Reviewer jobs in Oregon look for?

The top searched job categories for Peer Reviewer jobs in Oregon are:

What cities in Oregon are hiring for Peer Reviewer jobs?

Cities in Oregon with the most Peer Reviewer job openings:

Peer Reviewer jobs near you
Infographic showing various Peer Reviewer job openings in Oregon as of August 2026, with employment types broken down into 33% Full Time, 66% Part Time, and 1% Contract. Highlights an 92% Physical, 1% Hybrid, and 7% Remote job distribution, with an average salary of $44,884 per year, or $21.6 per hour.

Expert Reviewer

On-site

Grant Engine
Biotechnology Research and Development • 11 - 50 employees
Learn more about Grant Engineexternal

Part-time

Re-posted yesterday

Job description

Expert Reviewer – Biomedical Technologies
Grant Engine is committed to improving how grants are written and reviewed so that compelling technologies are funded that will combat disease and improve human life. Our Expert Reviewers are an integral part of Grant Engines process.
As such, we seek the most accomplished, broad-thinking, experienced scientists and product-development experts to serve as peer reviewers in Grant Engine’s Expert Review™.
Grant Engine is focused on securing funding for leading companies that have high potential to make a difference for the human race. Our vision is to improve and extend human life by supporting selected clients via our Team and process. In this mission, we selectively work with clients who have a demonstrated potential differentiation over the standard of care in their respective domain. In this pursuit, we hold the following core values in high regard: Trust, Customer Success, Excellence Without Bias, Teamwork.
We realize that to build this vision, Grant Engine must be a leader in the field. We identify innovation from every corner of our company, and we are committed to excellence in every facet of our work. Each of us gets results by employing, or pioneering, cutting-edge techniques in communication and program management to realize our vision. We know that every detail matters. We are committed to successfully delivering on our own goals so that our teammates can deliver on theirs. Everyone on our team realizes that when clients win, our mission is accomplished.
A key tenet of the Grant Engine team is that we work well together! We trust one another’s judgment and have established an effective dynamic of delivering on our individual goals to the point that trust has been built such that we can rely on each other to deliver. Grant Engine has compelling work for those that meet our qualifications and demonstrate the values of peer review: expertise in assessment; transparency; impartiality; fairness; confidentiality; integrity, and efficiency.
The peer review process is a central tenet to the expert, ethical, fair, transparent, and efficient process of winning a grant. Peer-review is an essential dimension of securing funding. Grant Engine has adopted a process for effective grant development that includes expert review in a way that identifies and remediates potential conflict-of-interests. As such, we adopt the highest-common-denominator of NIH, DoD, and other funding source’s values for peer-review.
This position is a part-time opportunity.
Deliverables:
· Review grants from various agencies and provide written feedback that follows the specific agency’s format and criteria.
· Provide detailed and diligent written feedback to guide Grant Engine and our clients in how to better position the grant for success.
· Timely delivery (4-6 day turnaround) of Expert Reviews.
· Ability to handle several projects concurrently as needed.
Required Qualifications:
· PhD in biological sciences, biomedical engineering, or other life science or healthcare associated field, or MD
· Alternatively, Master’s Degree for selected individuals in biology, biochemistry, biomedical engineering, other life science, or relevant background.
· Primary experience sitting on scientific review panels reviewing grants.
Preferred Experience or Qualifications
· Experience with agencies beyond NIH and NSF, including, but not limited to, ARPA-H, BARDA, CIRM or CPRIT, as well as foundations such as the Michael J. Fox Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, or the Gates Foundation.
· Experience with the Department of Defense’s Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs is a plus.
· Knowledge of programmatic (non-scientific) factors that can make grants at a specific agency more competitive.
· Ability to assess grants that have an AI component to their research is a plus.
Additional Qualifications and Competencies:
· Critical Evaluation: Measurement and assessment skills objectivity, critical thinking, problem solving, curiosity, inquisitiveness, research methodology, knowledge management, on-line search skills.
· Communication for Impact: Exceptional verbal and written English language communications skills, presentation skills, diplomacy, perceptual objectivity, active listening.
· Relationship Building via commentary: objectivity, credibility, confidentiality, constructive and respectful.
· Flexibility: Ability to handle changing priorities and multiple deadlines while maintaining high quality of workmanship.
· Ethical Practice: Rapport building, trust building, personal and professional integrity, credibility, professional and personal courage.
Compensation:
Compensation commensurate with expertise, experience and level of contribution.

Apply