1

Peer Review Jobs in Washington (NOW HIRING)

ICF is seeking experienced Title IV-E Peer Reviewers to join a team of child welfare professionals ... Assisting CB in conducting a Title IV-E Review by: * Working alone or with a state reviewer ...

Submits supportive research relevant to peer review and best evidence practice patterns. * Documents all pertinent clinical patient / case file information and actions into case notes.

New

Scientific Reviewer

Bethesda, MD ยท On-site

$60 - $80/hr

Attends peer review meetings to take notes for use when preparing final summary of documentation of meeting proceedings. * Schedule review meetings; prepare materials for reviewers; interact with ...

Peer Review * Strong Written English Preferred Qualifications * PhD in a technical, STEM, English, literature, journalism, or related field. * Experience with academic research, writing, or peer ...

Showing results 21-40

Peer Review information

See Washington salary details

$11

$23

$34

How much do peer review jobs pay per hour?

As of Sep 7, 2026, the average hourly pay for peer review in Washington is $23.12, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $19.62 and $25.34 per hour, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What is peer review?

Peer review is a process used in academic and scientific publishing where experts in the same field as the author evaluate a manuscript, research paper, or proposal before it is published. The goal is to ensure the work meets the necessary standards for quality, validity, and originality. Peer reviewers provide feedback to help authors improve their work and help editors decide whether the work should be published. This process helps maintain the integrity of scholarly literature and promotes trust in published research.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as a peer reviewer?

To thrive as a Peer Reviewer, you need subject matter expertise, critical analysis skills, and a strong academic or professional background relevant to the field. Familiarity with reference management software, journal submission systems, and adherence to ethical guidelines is typically required. Effective communication, objectivity, and attention to detail are essential soft skills for providing constructive and unbiased feedback. These skills ensure the quality, integrity, and credibility of published research or professional work.

What are some common challenges faced by professionals in peer review roles, and how can they be managed effectively?

Professionals involved in peer review often face challenges such as tight deadlines, balancing objectivity with constructive feedback, and managing potential conflicts of interest. To navigate these, it's important to communicate clearly with editorial teams, maintain transparency regarding any potential biases, and allocate dedicated time for thorough manuscript evaluations. Collaborating with other reviewers and participating in professional development workshops can also help enhance review quality and stay updated on best practices.

What is the difference between Peer Review vs Peer Reviewer?

AspectPeer ReviewPeer Reviewer
DefinitionThe process of evaluating work or research by experts in the same field.The individual who conducts the evaluation during a peer review process.
Required CredentialsTypically advanced degrees or expertise in the subject area.Similar credentials as the peer review process, often with academic or professional qualifications.
Work EnvironmentAcademic, research, or publishing settings.Academic journals, research institutions, or conferences.
UsageRefers to the process or concept of review.Refers to the person performing the review.

In summary, Peer Review is the process of evaluating scholarly work, while a Peer Reviewer is the individual who performs this evaluation. Both roles require similar credentials and are integral to academic and research settings.

How do you become a peer reviewer?

To become a peer reviewer, individuals typically need relevant expertise in the subject area, often demonstrated through advanced degrees or professional experience. They may also need to be invited by journal editors or complete training on review processes, and having strong critical thinking and communication skills is essential.

What are the most commonly searched types of Peer Review jobs in Washington?

The most popular types of Peer Review jobs in Washington are:

Infographic showing various Peer Review job openings in Washington as of August 2026, with employment types broken down into 100% Full Time. Highlights an 100% In-person job distribution, with an average salary of $48,082 per year, or $23.1 per hour.

PEER REVIEWER - OTOLARYNGOLOGY - REMOTE

iMPROve Health

Washington, DC โ€ข Remote

Contractor

Posted 24 days ago


Job description

iMPROve Health is seeking a Otolaryngology Physician to serve as an independent contractor (1099) performing independent external medical reviews remotely on an ad hoc basis.  As a peer reviewer, you will apply your clinical expertise to evaluate cases, specific to your specialty, medical necessity and/or standard of care, supporting efforts to enhance the overall quality and integrity of health care and your profession. Please note, this is not an employed position and our contracted fee is based on credential and specialty type.

BENEFITS:

  • Make a Difference: Use your clinical knowledge to improve the quality of care patients receive.
  • Professional Recognition: Join a network of highly respected experts in your specialty.
  • Competitive Compensation: Receive fair pay for your time and expertise.
  • Protect Standards of Care: Help uphold the integrity of your profession.
  • Work Remotely: Review cases from the convenience of your home or office.

DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES:

  • Conduct objective, evidence-based peer reviews of clinical cases.
  • Make final determinations regarding medical necessity and quality of care.
  • Ensure decisions are fair, unbiased, and aligned with current standards of practice.
  • Submit reviews in a timely and professional manner using the IT systems provided.

QUALIFICATIONS:

  • Medical License: Must hold an unrestricted medical license in any U.S. state.
  • Board Certification: Required (if applicable), through a board recognized by:
    • The American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS),
    • The American Osteopathic Association (AOA), or
    • Another nationally recognized board granting certification.
  • Clinical Experience:
    • Have at least five (5) years full-time equivalent experience providing direct clinical care to patients.
    • Have experience providing direct clinical care to patients within the past three (3) years.
    • Knowledgeable of the issue under review, or of the current, evidence-based clinical guidelines and novel treatments for the medical or behavioral health condition, disease, treatment, or procedure under review.
    • Have the clinical expertise to manage the medical or behavioral health condition or disease under review.
    • Must be actively engaged in direct or virtual patient care for at least 20 hours per week. Administrative work does not qualify.

TECHNOLOGY REQUIREMENTS:

  • Reliable Wi-Fi access.
  • Proficiency with Microsoft Word.
  • Access to a computer compatible with iMPROve Health’s IT systems.

OTHER REQUIREMENTS:

  • Must complete the electronic credentialing application and receive organizational approval prior to performing a case review.
  • Must complete a conflict of interest attestation upon credentialing and prior to performing a case review.
  • Active hospital medical staff privileges may be required, as applicable.
  • Notify the organization in a timely manner of an adverse change in licensure or certification status, including board certification status.
  • Cannot have current employment or affiliation with any Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital, health care system, or medical center if applying to perform VA-related peer reviews.

EOE/VET/Disability