1

Manager Ai Annotation Jobs in Seattle, WA (NOW HIRING)

Medical Coder - Remote

Seattle, WA · Remote

$50 - $80/hr

No prior AI experience is required--your coding expertise and attention to detail are what matter ... Apply Evaluation & Management (E&M) guidelines to assess coding levels and validate healthcare ...

Medical Coder - Remote

Seattle, WA · Remote

$50 - $80/hr

No prior AI experience is required--your coding expertise and attention to detail are what matter ... Apply Evaluation & Management (E&M) guidelines to assess coding levels and validate healthcare ...

No prior AI experience is required--your healthcare legal expertise, regulatory knowledge, and ... Legal Document Review & Annotation * Policy Analysis * Contract Drafting * U.S. Healthcare ...

No prior AI experience is required--your healthcare legal expertise, regulatory knowledge, and ... Legal Document Review & Annotation * Policy Analysis * Contract Drafting * U.S. Healthcare ...

... annotation, and generative AI services-to Fortune 500 leaders. TransPerfect AI offers a premier ... Partner with our world-class Solutions Architects and Project Managers to ensure the seamless ...

Showing results 21-40

Manager Ai Annotation information

See Seattle, WA salary details

$40.4K

$116.4K

$187.8K

How much do manager ai annotation jobs pay per year?

As of Sep 2, 2026, the average yearly pay for manager ai annotation in Seattle, WA is $116,404.00, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $86,500.00 and $146,800.00 per year, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What is the difference between Manager Ai Annotation vs Data Annotator?

AspectManager Ai AnnotationData Annotator
Required CredentialsBachelor's degree in related field, experience in AI projectsHigh school diploma or equivalent, on-the-job training
Work EnvironmentTeam management, project oversight, collaboration with data scientistsData labeling tasks, working with annotation tools
Industry UsageAI development, machine learning projectsData preparation for AI models
Search & Comparison IntentUnderstanding managerial roles in AI annotationEntry-level annotation tasks

The main difference between Manager Ai Annotation and Data Annotator lies in their responsibilities and experience. Managers oversee annotation projects, coordinate teams, and ensure quality, requiring leadership skills and experience. Data Annotators focus on labeling data accurately under supervision. Managers typically have higher credentials and work in strategic roles, while annotators perform the hands-on labeling tasks essential for AI training.

What are the most commonly searched types of Ai Annotation jobs in Seattle, WA?

The most popular types of Ai Annotation jobs in Seattle, WA are:

What are popular job titles related to Manager Ai Annotation jobs in Seattle, WA?

For Manager Ai Annotation jobs in Seattle, WA, the most frequently searched job titles are:

What job categories do people searching Manager Ai Annotation jobs in Seattle, WA look for?

The top searched job categories for Manager Ai Annotation jobs in Seattle, WA are:

Financial Risk & Safety Specialist (AI Systems)

mpathic

Seattle, WA • On-site, Remote

$30 - $200/hr

Contractor

Re-posted 13 days ago


Job description

    About mpathic.ai

    Keeping the human in AI. mpathic is a trusted leader in advancing quality and safety in AI systems through expert-led evaluation and human data. We partner with leading technology companies to support red teaming, trust & safety, expert annotation, and model evaluation across high-stakes domains.


    Our reviewers bring deep expertise in behavioral analysis, conversational design, mental health, and increasingly, financial and enterprise decision-making contexts.


    About the Role

    mpathic is seeking part-time Financial Experts to support a red-teaming and quality assurance (QA) campaign focused on evaluating AI system behavior in consumer-facing financial interactions.


    In this role, you will review AI-generated responses and multi-turn conversations to identify risks related to financial guidance, inappropriate agreement (e.g., sycophancy), overconfidence, and failure to appropriately communicate uncertainty or limitations.


    This is not a financial advising role. Instead, it focuses on evaluation and red teaming-specifically, adversarial thinking and expert judgment applied to AI outputs in simulated scenarios.


    What You'll Be Working On

    You will help identify, prevent, and characterize risks that emerge when users engage AI systems in financial and general inquiry contexts.


    Responsibilities may include:

    • Reviewing AI-generated financial content and conversations for accuracy, appropriateness, and risk
    • Identifying unsafe or misleading financial guidance (e.g., overconfident claims, risk minimization, inappropriate advice)
    • Evaluating how AI systems handle uncertainty, disclaimers, and scope of knowledge in consumer-facing contexts
    • Assessing whether models appropriately challenge or push back on risky or incorrect user assumptions
    • Identifying patterns of sycophancy, over-alignment, or inappropriate agreement
    • Evaluating multi-turn conversations for drift, escalation, and policy breakdown over time
    • Participating in or reviewing red teaming exercises, including adversarial probing of AI systems to surface failure modes
    • Evaluating how models respond under pressure, ambiguity, and escalating user intent
    • Supporting quality assurance (QA) of red teaming outputs to ensure consistency and rigor
    • Documenting edge cases, failure modes, and emerging risk patterns
    • Providing structured written feedback to internal teams
    • Collaborating with interdisciplinary teams on AI safety, policy, and evaluation frameworks
    • Maintaining strict confidentiality and quality standards


    This role requires strong judgment, attention to nuance, and comfort evaluating ambiguous or evolving scenarios.


    What We're Looking For

    Successful candidates are thoughtful, detail-oriented, and able to apply financial expertise to assess risk, uncertainty, and appropriateness in conversational AI systems.


    Basic Qualifications

    • Professional experience in one or more of the following:
      • Finance, investment analysis, or financial advising
      • Banking, wealth management, or asset management
      • Financial risk, compliance, or regulatory roles
      • Corporate finance, accounting, or financial planning
    • Strong understanding of:
      • Financial risk, uncertainty, and decision-making
      • Appropriate vs. inappropriate financial guidance in consumer contexts
      • How non-experts interpret financial information
    • Ability to identify:
      • Overconfidence, misleading claims, or missing risk disclosures
      • Inappropriate agreement with risky or incorrect user assumptions
    • Failures in escalation, boundary setting, or uncertainty communication
    • Strong written communication skills and ability to clearly explain reasoning
    • Experience with or interest in:
      • Red teaming, adversarial testing, or safety evaluation of AI systems
      • Evaluating how systems fail under realistic user behavior
    • Comfort working with AI tools and conversational outputs
    • Ability to work remotely using Slack and standard productivity tools
    • Comfort with ambiguity, iteration, and feedback-driven workflows
    • Willingness to sign NDAs and work with sensitive content
    • Availability ~10 hours per week for 8 weeks (starting in mid-April), with occasional scheduled meetings


    Nice to Have (Not Required)

    • Certifications (e.g., CFA, CFP, CPA, FRM)
    • Experience in financial compliance or regulatory frameworks (e.g., SEC, FINRA)
    • Background in consumer financial protection or financial education
    • Experience with fintech, digital finance products, or robo-advisors
    • Prior experience with AI evaluation, annotation, or safety work
    • Interest in AI, NLP, or responsible technology


    Compensation

    $30-200/hour, depending on experience and specific project tasks/difficulty