ZipRecruiter

Log In

1

Expert Reviewer Jobs (NOW HIRING)

Grant Engine

Expert Reviewer - Biomedical Technologies Grant Engine is committed to improving how grants are written and reviewed so that compelling technologies are funded that will combat disease and improve ...

next page

Showing results 1-20

All JobsTechnology JobsData JobsData Reviewer JobsExpert Reviewer Jobs

Expert Reviewer information

See salary details

$10

$29

$48

How much do expert reviewer jobs pay per hour?

As of Sep 13, 2026, the average hourly pay for expert reviewer in the United States is $29.88, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $22.60 and $36.54 per hour, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What is an expert reviewer?

Expert Reviewers are professionals with specialized knowledge in a particular field who evaluate and assess the quality, accuracy, or validity of work submitted for review. They are often engaged by academic journals, publishers, or organizations to provide objective feedback, ensure standards are met, and help maintain the integrity of the publication or process. Their evaluations can influence whether a work is accepted, revised, or rejected, making their role critical in quality control and advancement within their field.

What skills and qualifications are needed to thrive as an expert reviewer?

To thrive as an Expert Reviewer, you need subject-matter expertise, advanced analytical abilities, and a keen attention to detail, typically demonstrated through relevant degrees and professional experience. Familiarity with review management systems, data analysis tools, and industry-specific standards or certifications is often required. Strong written communication, critical thinking, and impartiality help set top performers apart in this role. These skills ensure accurate, objective assessments that maintain quality and credibility in the review process.

What are common challenges faced by expert reviewers, and how can they be addressed?

Expert Reviewers often encounter the challenge of maintaining objectivity while evaluating work within their area of expertise, especially when industry standards evolve rapidly. Balancing thorough analysis with tight deadlines is another common hurdle, as is providing actionable and constructive feedback that is both clear and diplomatic. To address these challenges, it is helpful to stay current with professional developments, establish a structured review process, and engage regularly with peers to calibrate standards and expectations.

What is the difference between Expert Reviewer vs Content Editor?

AspectExpert ReviewerContent Editor
CredentialsSubject matter expertise, certifications in the fieldWriting, editing, or journalism qualifications
Work EnvironmentAcademic, scientific, or technical settingsPublishing, media, digital content teams
Employer & IndustryResearch institutions, publishers, corporationsMedia outlets, publishing houses, online platforms
Search & Comparison IntentQuality assurance, accuracy, technical reviewContent quality, clarity, style editing

Expert Reviewers focus on verifying accuracy and technical correctness within specialized fields, often requiring certifications or subject expertise. Content Editors concentrate on improving readability, style, and overall presentation of content. While both roles involve reviewing content, Expert Reviewers ensure factual precision, whereas Content Editors enhance clarity and flow.

More about Expert Reviewer jobs

What are popular job titles related to Expert Reviewer jobs?

For Expert Reviewer jobs, the most frequently searched job titles are:

Expert Reviewer jobs near you
Infographic showing various Expert Reviewer job openings in the United States as of September 2026, with employment types broken down into 55% Full Time, 39% Part Time, and 6% Contract. Highlights an 39% In-person, 6% Hybrid, and 55% Remote job distribution, with an average salary of $62,159 per year, or $29.9 per hour.

Expert Reviewer

On-site

Grant Engine
Biotechnology Research and Development • 11 - 50 employees
Learn more about Grant Engineexternal

Part-time

Re-posted 15 days ago

Key responsibilities

  • Review grants from various agencies and provide written feedback following specific agency formats and criteria.

  • Provide detailed and diligent written feedback to guide clients in improving their grant applications.

  • Deliver expert reviews within a 4-6 day turnaround and handle multiple projects concurrently.

Job description

Expert Reviewer – Biomedical Technologies
Grant Engine is committed to improving how grants are written and reviewed so that compelling technologies are funded that will combat disease and improve human life. Our Expert Reviewers are an integral part of Grant Engines process.
As such, we seek the most accomplished, broad-thinking, experienced scientists and product-development experts to serve as peer reviewers in Grant Engine’s Expert Review™.
Grant Engine is focused on securing funding for leading companies that have high potential to make a difference for the human race. Our vision is to improve and extend human life by supporting selected clients via our Team and process. In this mission, we selectively work with clients who have a demonstrated potential differentiation over the standard of care in their respective domain. In this pursuit, we hold the following core values in high regard: Trust, Customer Success, Excellence Without Bias, Teamwork.
We realize that to build this vision, Grant Engine must be a leader in the field. We identify innovation from every corner of our company, and we are committed to excellence in every facet of our work. Each of us gets results by employing, or pioneering, cutting-edge techniques in communication and program management to realize our vision. We know that every detail matters. We are committed to successfully delivering on our own goals so that our teammates can deliver on theirs. Everyone on our team realizes that when clients win, our mission is accomplished.
A key tenet of the Grant Engine team is that we work well together! We trust one another’s judgment and have established an effective dynamic of delivering on our individual goals to the point that trust has been built such that we can rely on each other to deliver. Grant Engine has compelling work for those that meet our qualifications and demonstrate the values of peer review: expertise in assessment; transparency; impartiality; fairness; confidentiality; integrity, and efficiency.
The peer review process is a central tenet to the expert, ethical, fair, transparent, and efficient process of winning a grant. Peer-review is an essential dimension of securing funding. Grant Engine has adopted a process for effective grant development that includes expert review in a way that identifies and remediates potential conflict-of-interests. As such, we adopt the highest-common-denominator of NIH, DoD, and other funding source’s values for peer-review.
This position is a part-time opportunity.
Deliverables:
· Review grants from various agencies and provide written feedback that follows the specific agency’s format and criteria.
· Provide detailed and diligent written feedback to guide Grant Engine and our clients in how to better position the grant for success.
· Timely delivery (4-6 day turnaround) of Expert Reviews.
· Ability to handle several projects concurrently as needed.
Required Qualifications:
· PhD in biological sciences, biomedical engineering, or other life science or healthcare associated field, or MD
· Alternatively, Master’s Degree for selected individuals in biology, biochemistry, biomedical engineering, other life science, or relevant background.
· Primary experience sitting on scientific review panels reviewing grants.
Preferred Experience or Qualifications
· Experience with agencies beyond NIH and NSF, including, but not limited to, ARPA-H, BARDA, CIRM or CPRIT, as well as foundations such as the Michael J. Fox Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, or the Gates Foundation.
· Experience with the Department of Defense’s Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs is a plus.
· Knowledge of programmatic (non-scientific) factors that can make grants at a specific agency more competitive.
· Ability to assess grants that have an AI component to their research is a plus.
Additional Qualifications and Competencies:
· Critical Evaluation: Measurement and assessment skills objectivity, critical thinking, problem solving, curiosity, inquisitiveness, research methodology, knowledge management, on-line search skills.
· Communication for Impact: Exceptional verbal and written English language communications skills, presentation skills, diplomacy, perceptual objectivity, active listening.
· Relationship Building via commentary: objectivity, credibility, confidentiality, constructive and respectful.
· Flexibility: Ability to handle changing priorities and multiple deadlines while maintaining high quality of workmanship.
· Ethical Practice: Rapport building, trust building, personal and professional integrity, credibility, professional and personal courage.
Compensation:
Compensation commensurate with expertise, experience and level of contribution.

Apply