1

Ai Source Code Generation Jobs (NOW HIRING)

Experience working on AI agent systems, code generation tools, or programmable interfaces * Personal experience building and deploying web products (side projects, startups, or open-source work)

Recruiter

San Francisco, CA · On-site

$135K - $175K/yr

... source code generation projects. * Already Crushing It: We're currently growing at 120% QoQ. For our first product, we built proprietary generative AI technology that enables our Agents to ...

Data Analyst

San Francisco, CA · On-site

$100K - $170K/yr

Our researchers created some of the world's most popular open-source code generation projects. * Already Crushing It: Growing at 120% QoQ, our AI Agents autonomously design, code, and deploy A/B ...

... support source control, issue tracking, code reviews, sprint execution, and software delivery workflows. * Support AI-assisted code generation, debugging, test generation, refactoring, and ...

Staff AI/ML Engineer

San Francisco, CA · On-site

$250K - $350K/yr

Code Generation/Assistance : Developing or debugging code autonomously (e.g., similar to Devin AI ... Contributions to open-source AI/ML projects (e.g., Hugging Face, PyTorch). * Expertise in retrieval ...

Staff AI/ML Engineer

San Francisco, CA · On-site +1

$250K - $350K/yr

Code Generation/Assistance : Developing or debugging code autonomously (e.g., similar to Devin AI ... Contributions to open-source AI/ML projects (e.g., Hugging Face, PyTorch). * Expertise in retrieval ...

Intelligent Code Analysis: Implement AI-powered static analysis and code generation tools that ... Contributions to open-source AI or developer tooling projects. Understanding of prompt engineering ...

In this position, you will utilize your expertise to assist in training the next generation of AI ... for source code management, including branching and pull request workflows. • In-depth ...

next page

Showing results 1-20

Ai Source Code Generation information

See salary details

$31K

$93.2K

$169K

How much do ai source code generation jobs pay per year?

As of Jun 5, 2026, the average yearly pay for ai source code generation in the United States is $93,198.00, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $54,500.00 and $144,500.00 per year, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as an AI Source Code Generation Engineer, and why are they important?

To thrive as an AI Source Code Generation Engineer, you need strong programming expertise, knowledge of machine learning concepts, and experience with AI model development, often supported by a degree in computer science or a related field. Familiarity with frameworks like TensorFlow or PyTorch, version control systems such as Git, and experience using code generation APIs or tools are typically required. Creativity, problem-solving, and effective communication are crucial soft skills for translating requirements into robust AI-generated code solutions. These skills and qualifications are essential for developing accurate, maintainable, and innovative AI-driven code generation systems that meet user and business needs.

What is AI source code generation?

AI source code generation is the use of artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning models like large language models, to automatically generate computer program source code based on user input, specifications, or natural language instructions. This technology helps developers write code faster, reduce repetitive tasks, and can even assist non-programmers in creating simple applications. AI source code generation tools can support multiple programming languages and frameworks, making them versatile for a wide range of software development tasks. However, the generated code still typically requires human review to ensure quality, correctness, and security.

What is the difference between Ai Source Code Generation vs AI Software Developer?

AspectAi Source Code GenerationAI Software Developer
Required CredentialsKnowledge of AI models, programming, and data scienceComputer science degree, programming skills, experience with AI/ML
Work EnvironmentTools for AI model training, code generation platforms, cloud servicesSoftware development teams, IDEs, version control systems
Employer & Industry UsageTech companies, AI startups, research institutionsSoftware firms, tech companies, enterprise IT departments
Search & Comparison IntentUnderstanding AI-driven code tools, automation in codingDeveloping AI applications, coding best practices

Ai Source Code Generation focuses on using AI models to automatically generate code, streamlining development processes. AI Software Developers design, build, and maintain AI-powered applications, requiring programming expertise and AI knowledge. While both roles involve AI and coding, source code generation emphasizes automation tools, whereas AI software development involves creating AI solutions from scratch.

What are the typical collaborative processes between AI source code generation engineers and other development team members?

AI source code generation engineers often work closely with software developers, product managers, and data scientists to ensure that generated code aligns with project requirements and integrates smoothly with existing systems. Collaboration typically involves participating in sprint planning, code reviews, and regular stand-up meetings to discuss progress and address challenges. Open communication and feedback loops are essential, as engineers may need to adjust AI models based on user feedback and team input. This collaborative environment enhances code quality and accelerates the development lifecycle.
Infographic showing various Ai Source Code Generation job openings in the United States as of May 2026, with employment types broken down into 76% Full Time, 23% Part Time, and 1% Contract. Highlights an 92% Physical, 2% Hybrid, and 6% Remote job distribution, with an average salary of $93,198 per year, or $44.8 per hour.
AI Advocate - Open-Source & Research

AI Advocate - Open-Source & Research

Snorkel AI

San Francisco, CA • On-site

Other

Posted 14 days ago


Job description

About the Role

You'll be Snorkel's primary technical voice in the open-source and research communities. The work spans three audiences: frontier AI research teams (post-training, RL environments, evals and benchmarks), enterprise ML and applied AI teams building specialized models on proprietary expertise, and the broader data-centric AI community.

You'll partner closely with our research, forward deployed research, and product teams to translate the methodology behind Snorkel's work into world-class technical content, open-source contributions, conference presence, and a thriving community of data-centric AI practitioners.

Success looks like: a strong Snorkel open-source presence, a steady cadence of high-signal technical writing and research artifacts, marquee presence at the conferences that matter (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AI Engineer World's Fair), and an engaged community of researchers and practitioners who view Snorkel as the trusted authority on data development for modern AI.

Responsibilities
  • Own Snorkel's external technical voice. Write methodology posts, technical deep-dives, and research-grade content on data development for frontier models. 
  • Lead Snorkel's open-source presence. Define the GTM approach, ship code, review PRs, recruit contributors, and keep the libraries credible and current. Build OSS that demonstrates Snorkel's methodology in practice, including reproducible evals and benchmark artifacts.
  • Advance the conversation on AI evaluation and benchmarking. Publish original work on how to measure agentic AI systems. Domain-specific evals, agent evals, LLM-as-judge calibration, contamination and saturation, and the connection between evals and post-training data.
  • Drive conference and research community presence. Land talks, papers, and workshops at NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AI Engineer World's Fair, and the right practitioner venues. Build relationships with academic labs and AI research teams.
  • Partner with the research team. Translate what's learned in research collaborations into externally shareable methodology, case studies, and tooling.
  • Set the bar for technical credibility. Design evals and benchmarks, prototype RL environments, and write code worth using. Your authority comes from doing the work, not just talking about it.
Preferred Qualifications
  • Experience. 6+ years in applied ML research, AI engineering, developer/research advocacy, or a research-intensive technical role with significant public output. Prior DevRel/advocate experience welcome but not required.
  • Deep technical fluency in modern AI. Post-training techniques (RLHF, DPO, RLAIF), evaluation methodologies, RL environment design, training data pipelines, synthetic data generation, and at least one applied domain (coding agents, reasoning, multimodal, agents).
  • Hands-on experience with AI evaluation and benchmarks. You've built and run real evals: public benchmarks (MMLU, GPQA, SWE-bench, HELM, BIG-bench, Arena-style head-to-heads), domain-specific custom evals, and LLM-as-judge pipelines with proper calibration. 
  • You build with AI, not just about AI. A power user of frontier coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and the like) in your day-to-day workflow, and you've built non-trivial agentic systems yourself - multi-step, tool-using, with real evals and an opinion on what breaks.
  • A real public body of work. Talks, papers, blog posts, podcasts, and/or OSS contributions you can point to. Quality and signal matter more than volume.
  • Customer- and researcher-facing presence. Comfortable in a room with frontier-lab research leads or a F500 ML team; can read the room and hold technical credibility on either side.
  • Self-directed and comfortable with ambiguity. You ship without being asked, set your own quality bar, and enjoy moving at the pace of frontier AI.

Bonus: Advanced degree or sustained research output in ML/AI; prior experience at an AI lab, OSS-first AI company, or a research-driven technical org; conference program-committee or organizing experience; published or maintained a public benchmark; relationships in the post-training, evals, or RL-environments communities.