1

Systematic Review Jobs in Alberta (NOW HIRING)

Generate and manage the review and issuance of Subcontract Agreements ensuring all relevant ... Proven systematic and organized approach to multi-tasking. * Ability to work under time constraints ...

Generate and manage the review and issuance of Subcontract Agreements ensuring all relevant ... Proven systematic and organized approach to multi-tasking. * Ability to work under time constraints ...

Generate and manage the review and issuance of Subcontract Agreements ensuring all relevant ... Proven systematic and organized approach to multi-tasking. * Ability to work under time constraints ...

Off-Page SEO Manager

Calgary, AB ยท On-site +1

CA$80K - CA$100K/yr

... systematic. You think in terms of repeatable processes, not one-off wins - you're the kind of ... Own the end-to-end vendor relationship lifecycle, including sourcing, negotiation, quality review ...

Participate in project reviews with Engineering and Drafting to clarify drawings, address ... Develop inspection checklists and procedures to ensure systematic evaluation. * Replace worn or ...

Application Security Developer

Calgary, AB ยท Hybrid

CA$119K - CA$161K/yr

Write, review, debug, and implement tools to help developers avoid security flaws; * Build ... and systematic fixes for recurring vulnerabilities; * Resolve issues, navigate ambiguity, and ...

next page

Showing results 1-20

Systematic Review information

See Alberta salary details

$12

$41

$107

How much do systematic review jobs pay per hour?

As of Sep 14, 2026, the average hourly pay for systematic review in Alberta is $41.71, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $19.47 and $46.88 per hour, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What is a systematic review?

A Systematic Review job involves conducting comprehensive and structured reviews of existing research to answer specific questions. Professionals in this role systematically collect, evaluate, and synthesize relevant studies following predefined protocols to minimize bias. These reviews are commonly used in healthcare, social sciences, and policy-making to inform decisions based on high-quality evidence. Responsibilities may include literature searching, data extraction, quality assessment, and report writing. Strong analytical skills, attention to detail, and familiarity with research methodologies are essential for success in this role.

What are some typical challenges faced when conducting systematic reviews?

Systematic reviewers often encounter challenges such as managing large volumes of literature, ensuring unbiased and thorough data extraction, and dealing with incomplete or inconsistent information across studies. Coordination among team members, particularly when studies use different methodologies or report outcomes variably, can also pose difficulties. Staying up-to-date with best practices and maintaining rigorous documentation throughout the review process is essential. Overcoming these challenges requires strong project management skills and effective collaboration, making systematic reviews a demanding but rewarding research role.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive in the systematic review position, and why are they important?

To excel in a Systematic Review position, you need strong research skills, critical thinking, and expertise in literature search and synthesis, often supported by an advanced degree in health sciences or social sciences. Familiarity with databases such as PubMed, Embase, and tools like Covidence or RevMan, along with knowledge of PRISMA guidelines, is typically required. Attention to detail, organizational ability, and effective communication make candidates stand out in this meticulous and collaborative role. These competencies are crucial for producing high-quality, transparent, and reproducible systematic reviews that inform evidence-based decision-making.

What are popular job titles related to Systematic Review jobs in Alberta?

For Systematic Review jobs in Alberta, the most frequently searched job titles are:

What job categories do people searching Systematic Review jobs in Alberta look for?

The top searched job categories for Systematic Review jobs in Alberta are:

Infographic showing various Systematic Review job openings in Alberta as of September 2026, with employment types broken down into 100% Full Time. Highlights an 100% Remote job distribution, with an average salary of $86,752 per year, or $41.7 per hour.

Director, Quantitative Investment Research

Calgary, AB โ€ข On-site

Alberta Investment Management Corporation (AIMCo)
201 - 500 employees

Other

Posted yesterday

New


Job description

Opportunity

The Economics & Investment Research (E&IR) is AIMCoโ€™s in-house macro and investment research function. We exist for one purpose: to help the Chief Investment Officer, senior investment leadership, investment committees, investment teams and our clients make better-informed decisions about how capital is positioned.

Closing Date

September 26, 2026

Opportunity

The Economics & Investment Research (E&IR) is AIMCoโ€™s in-house macro and investment research function. We exist for one purpose: to help the Chief Investment Officer, senior investment leadership, investment committees, investment teams and our clients make better-informed decisions about how capital is positioned.

Our product is a combination of evidence-based analysis, judgement and the tools that sharpen both.

The role

Reporting to the Chief Economist and Head of Economics & Investment Research, the Director, Quantitative Investment Research is the senior quantitative voice within E&IR. You will own the analytical frameworks behind how AIMCoโ€™s E&IR thinks about portfolio construction, risk budgeting, and asset allocation - and you will build the systematic tooling that turns those frameworks into something the CIO and investment committees can act on, cycle after cycle.

This is a hands-on Director role. You will spend a meaningful share of your time in code and data, and the rest translating results for people who will never open your notebook. You will help mentor a few quantitative analysts, setting the research agenda and the standards it is held to.

The work is deliberately positioned close to the decision. Your analysis will not sit in a research library; it will be in front of the CIO, investment committees, as well as clients and it will be debated.

What This Role Is โ€” And Is Not

This advisory mandate is total client portfolio construction, risk, and decision support (not a systematic alpha seat for standalone trading P&L). Candidates who want their work to change how CAD $200 billion is positioned will find it rewarding and purposeful.

What You Will Do Portfolio construction and asset allocation research
  • Own the advisory quantitative frameworks behind client total portfolio construction across CIO office risk optimization and capital allocation scenario analysis.
  • Design and evaluate top-down portfolio positioning and structure - and translate shifts in the macroeconomic regime into concrete, defensible positioning recommendations.
  • Model systematic risk factors across the portfolio, forecast their behaviour, and quantify what holding a given top-down view actually costs.
  • Build and maintain the top-down frameworks around benchmarking, currency hedging, and liquidity management.
  • Develop capital market assumptions and the analytics that connect them to portfolio outcomes, including for private market exposures.
  • Work within the real constraints of an asset owner: illiquidity, pacing, funding, and governance timelines - not a frictionless optimizer.
Systematic decision support for the Tactical Asset Allocation Committee
  • Build and own the systematic toolkit that supports the TAA Committee: regime and cycle models, valuation and momentum indicators, positioning and flow trackers, and complementary risk dashboards.
  • Establish a repeatable cadence - the same evidence, produced the same way, every cycle - so that Committee debate is about judgement rather than about whose numbers are right.
  • Frame conclusions probabilistically rather than as point forecasts, and be explicit about where consensus is strong, where it is thin, and where we differ.
  • Design scenario narratives, with E&IR and Risk Management colleagues, with the transmission channels made visible: what the shock is, how it propagates, and which exposures it reaches first.
  • Backtest and stress-test proposed tactical tilts, and document both what the evidence supports and what it does not.
  • Maintain an honest scorecard of past tactical decisions and model performance, and feed that record back into the process.
Risk analytics and stress testing
  • Develop top-down macro factor risk decomposition, stress testing, scenario, and tail-risk analytics spanning public and private asset classes.
  • In collaboration with Risk Management and Multi-Asset Portfolio Management colleagues, answer the questions leadership actually asks: how much of our risk is really one bet, what breaks in which regime, and what the marginal dollar of risk buys us.
  • Partner with Risk Management as a first-line analytical counterpart - complementing independent oversight rather than duplicating it.
Research platform, data, and model governance
  • Own the E&IR quantitative stack: data pipelines, the research environment, code standards, and reproducibility.
  • Set model governance standards - documentation, validation, benchmarking, version control, and periodic review - so that any model informing a decision is defensible to investment committees and Risk.
  • Apply AI and large-language-model tooling deliberately and with judgement: accelerating research, processing unstructured macro and market information, and building governed interfaces to our own data. We are looking for demonstrated, critical application - not enthusiasm.
  • Partner with Risk Management, Global Data and Technology, and the asset class teams to source and integrate data as needed, and to avoid rebuilding what already exists elsewhere in the organization.
Leadership and influence
  • Mentor and set the technical bar for a small team of quantitative analysts.
  • Communicate complex quantitative concepts to technical and non-technical audiences alike - the CIO, the TAA Committee, and other senior investment forums.
  • Influence outcomes without direct authority, through analytical clarity rather than positional weight.
  • Act as a credible internal counterparty to portfolio managers and asset-class heads - able to challenge on method, and to be challenged in return.
Required What you will bring
  • 10+ years in total portfolio strategy, asset allocation, multi-asset portfolio construction, or investment risk analytics โ€” at an asset owner, asset manager, bank, or hedge fund.
  • A graduate degree (PhD, MFE, MSc, or equivalent) in a quantitatively rigorous discipline: mathematics, statistics, physics, financial engineering, econometrics, or computer science.
  • Demonstrated command of portfolio theory, factor risk modelling, asset pricing, and optimization.
  • Applied econometrics and time-series methods: regime models, volatility modelling, simulation, and an honest understanding of what breaks out of sample.
  • Expert Python, and production-quality engineering habits: version control, testing, documentation, reproducible research.
  • A track record of influencing senior decision-makers โ€” CIOs, investment committees, boards โ€” not merely of publishing research internally.
  • The ability to hold a strong view under challenge, and to change it when the evidence changes.
Preferred
  • Experience at a large asset owner (pension, sovereign wealth fund, endowment) with total portfolio rather than single strategy responsibility.
  • Familiarity with private market assets in a total portfolio risk context: stale pricing, de-smoothing, liquidity and pacing modelling, and private market capital market assumptions.
  • Experience building decision-support tools for an investment committee - not only research output.
  • Exposure to optimization solvers and to cloud-based research infrastructure.
  • Macro or systematic strategy research experience: regime modelling, nowcasting, or macro factor construction.
  • Demonstrated, practical use of AI/LLM tooling in a research or analytics setting.
  • People-management experience; CFA, FRM, or CAIA designation considered an asset.
Technical environment

Python; SQL; Git; Databricks; risk system - e.g. BlackRock Aladdin & MSCI BarraOne; Bloomberg, Macrobond; reporting layer - Power BI, Tableau, Streamlit, or Dash.

What Success Looks Like In The First Twelve Months
  • The TAA Committee receives a consistent, documented quantitative pack each cycle (monthly) - and uses it.
  • Total portfolio risk and thematic decomposition and scenario analysis are reproducible on demand, rather than assembled ad hoc each time they are asked for.
  • At least one portfolio construction framework has moved from prototype to production and has demonstrably changed a decision.
  • A scorecard of past tactical decisions exists, is honest, and is discussed.
  • The teamโ€™s research is version-controlled, documented, and rerunnable by someone other than its author.
Location, work model, and compensation

Location: Calgary. Work model: hybrid (3 days in office currently).

This posting will close at 11:59 pm MST on September 25, 2026.

At AIMCo, we draw upon the differences in who we are, where we come from and the way we think to deliver results for the Albertans who rely on us. We offer an inclusive, modern workplace where well-being is prioritized, and colleagues are enabled to do their best work. Our team members are motivated by our purpose and committed to creating longโ€‘term value for our clients and their beneficiaries.

#J-18808-Ljbffr