ZipRecruiter

Log In

2

Remote Systematic Review Meta Analysis Jobs in Danvers, IL

Maui Jim

Financial Planning & Analysis Analyst

Peoria, IL · On-site +1

$78K - $85K/yr

Ability to work remote 1 day a week. The principal responsibilities and duties of this position are ... Analyze and review selling prices and gross-to-net components, including discounts, rebates ...

micro1 AI

Cheminformatics Specialist - Remote

Peoria, IL · Remote

$80 - $110/hr

Analyze and interpret small-molecule and drug discovery datasets using advanced computational ... Assess and review AI-generated outputs for scientific rigor, accuracy, and practical relevance ...

Varsity Tutors

Spelling Bee Tutor

Normal, IL · Remote

$18 - $40/hr

Skilled at teaching word study strategies, etymological analysis, and systematic memorization ... review of frequently missed patterns to support students from classroom level through national ...

DataAnnotation

FP&A Manager - AI Trainer

Peoria, IL · Remote

$50 - $100/hr

Enjoy the flexibility of remote work and the freedom to set your own schedule. This is an ... Review and improve AI Assistant answers to questions about macro trends, corporate finance, and ...

SmartIPlace

Mulesoft Developer (Remote)

Bloomington, IL · Remote

$51.50 - $68.25/hr

... analysts, and delivery teams to implement scalable, secure, and supportable solutions. Work Model ... Collaborate with cross-functional teams to review requirements, provide technical feedback, and ...

micro1 AI

Physics Modeling Expert - Remote

Peoria, IL · Remote

$80 - $140/hr

... analyses. * Produce technically precise, clearly written solutions, detailing all assumptions ... Iterate on submitted solutions in response to feedback from project reviewers, ensuring corrections ...

Varsity Tutors

AP Research Tutor

Normal, IL · Remote

$18 - $40/hr

Guides students through conducting systematic literature reviews, selecting appropriate research methods, analyzing data, constructing evidence-based arguments, and presenting findings to expert ...

DataAnnotation

Treasury Analyst - AI Trainer

Peoria, IL · Remote

$50 - $100/hr

Enjoy the flexibility of remote work and the freedom to set your own schedule. This is an ... Review and improve AI Assistant answers to questions about macro trends, corporate finance, and ...

Nucor

Professional Engineer P.E. - Remote

El Paso, IL · On-site +1

$103K - $138K/yr

Technical Analysis: Utilize our proprietary software for frame, secondary, bracing, crane ... Oversight: Review and check structural drawings for accuracy. Continuous Learning: Embrace ...

next page

Showing results 1-20

All JobsSystematic Review Meta Analysis JobsRemote Systematic Review Meta Analysis JobsRemote Systematic Review Meta Analysis Jobs in Danvers, IL

Remote Systematic Review Meta Analysis information

See Danvers, IL salary details

$43.7K

$89.4K

$130K

How much do remote systematic review meta analysis jobs pay per year?

As of Aug 24, 2026, the average yearly pay for remote systematic review meta analysis in Danvers, IL is $89,398.00, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $67,200.00 and $113,200.00 per year, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What is a remote systematic review meta analysis?

Remote Systematic Review Meta Analysis jobs involve conducting comprehensive reviews of existing research studies from a remote location, often to answer specific clinical or scientific questions. These roles typically require summarizing and synthesizing data from multiple studies, evaluating study quality, and performing statistical meta-analyses to identify overall trends and conclusions. Professionals in these positions often work for academic institutions, healthcare organizations, or research consultancies, using specialized software and databases to manage and analyze large volumes of scientific literature. Remote work enables flexibility and access to global projects, making these jobs attractive to researchers and analysts across various fields.

What are some common challenges faced when conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses remotely, and how can they be addressed?

Working remotely on systematic reviews and meta-analyses often involves coordinating with team members across different time zones, ensuring consistent data management, and maintaining clear communication. Common challenges include version control of documents, discrepancies in data extraction, and delays in feedback cycles. These can be addressed by using collaborative tools (like shared databases and cloud platforms), establishing regular virtual meetings, and setting clear protocols for documentation and decision-making. Proactively addressing these challenges helps maintain accuracy, efficiency, and team cohesion throughout the review process.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as a remote systematic review meta analysis specialist, and why are they important?

To excel in Remote Systematic Review Meta Analysis, a strong background in research methodology, statistical analysis, and evidence-based practices—often supported by advanced degrees in health sciences or related fields—is essential. Proficiency in software such as RevMan, EndNote, Covidence, and statistical tools like R or Stata, along with knowledge of PRISMA guidelines, is typically required. Exceptional attention to detail, critical thinking, and clear written communication are vital soft skills for synthesizing complex data and collaborating remotely. These competencies ensure the integrity, accuracy, and reliability of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

What is the difference between Remote Systematic Review Meta Analysis vs Remote Research Analyst?

AspectRemote Systematic Review Meta AnalysisRemote Research Analyst
CredentialsAdvanced degrees in health sciences, research methods, or related fieldsBachelor's or master's in research, statistics, or related areas
Work EnvironmentPrimarily academic, healthcare, or research institutions; focused on literature synthesisVaried settings including market research, healthcare, or academia; data collection and analysis
Industry UsageCommon in healthcare, academia, and policy-makingUsed across multiple industries including healthcare, marketing, and finance

Remote Systematic Review Meta Analysis specialists focus on synthesizing research data through systematic reviews and meta-analyses, requiring advanced research credentials. Remote Research Analysts perform broader data collection and analysis tasks across industries, often with less specialized qualifications. While both roles involve research skills, the systematic review meta analysis role is more specialized in evidence synthesis within healthcare and academia.

What cities near Danvers, IL are hiring for Remote Systematic Review Meta Analysis jobs?

Cities near Danvers, IL with the most Remote Systematic Review Meta Analysis job openings:

Remote Systematic Review Meta Analysis jobs near you
Infographic showing various Remote Systematic Review Meta Analysis job openings in Danvers, IL as of August 2026, with employment types broken down into 1% As Needed, 80% Full Time, 14% Part Time, and 5% Contract. Highlights an 90% Physical, 3% Hybrid, and 7% Remote job distribution, with an average salary of $89,398 per year, or $43 per hour.

Principal Research Scientist - (Physics) AI Reviewer

Peoria, IL • Remote

micro1 AI
Software Development • 11 - 50 employees
Learn more about micro1 AIexternal

$80 - $160/hr

Part-time

Posted 22 days ago

Job description

Role Title: Physics Expert (Professor / Principal Investigator)


Role Type: Contractor.


Location: Remote


micro1 is engaging Physics Experts—established Professors or Principal Investigators—to provide high-level domain guidance as part of an impactful project for a customer. In this role, you'll apply your expertise to help train next-generation AI systems. Your work will shape how models learn, reason, and perform through high-quality, real-world input. No prior experience in AI is required — your domain knowledge is what matters.


Scope of Work

  1. Adjudicate and render expert judgment on contested or competing physics arguments, solutions, or interpretations within your subfield.
  2. Compare alternative approaches to the same problem, detailing which is superior, under what assumptions, and in which regimes.
  3. Identify and articulate meta-level criteria for evaluating the robustness and validity of competing physics work, such as key assumptions and breaking points of approximations.
  4. Exercise calibrated confidence by providing authoritative assessments while transparently acknowledging genuine uncertainty or open questions in the field.
  5. Draft defensible written evaluations suitable for review by fellow senior physicists, ensuring clarity and rigor.
  6. Leverage technical tools such as LaTeX, SymPy, Python, and Jupyter to verify or contrast technical claims as needed.
  7. Clearly communicate when a question is unresolved within the field and delineate the pertinent considerations.


Preferred Qualifications

  1. PhD in physics with demonstrated expertise and scholarly impact in your specified subfield.
  2. Current or former Associate Professor, Full Professor, Chair Professor, or Principal Investigator/Group Leader with a track record of independent research leadership.
  3. Ongoing research activity in one or more of these areas: High Energy Physics, Mathematical Physics, Biophysics, Statistical Physics, Condensed Matter, AMO/Quantum Optics, Gravitation, Cosmology, Astrophysics, Quantum Information, or Optical Properties of Materials.
  4. 3–5 recent representative publications in your target subfield, with arXiv or DOI references.
  5. Prior experience supervising PhD students or postdocs, or equivalent leadership in industry research settings.
  6. Proficiency with LaTeX, SymPy, Python, and Jupyter (please indicate any gaps in experience with these tools).
  7. Exceptional written communication skills, with the ability to articulate nuanced and well-reasoned judgments.

Apply