2

Hourly Remote Data Annotation Jobs in Austin, TX

High Volume (TOFU) Recruiter

Austin, TX · On-site +1

$55K - $100K/yr

... data collection and annotation -- delivering the datasets that frontier AI research requires and remote workforce marketplaces can't. We own projects end-to-end, from scoping and protocol design ...

Remote micro1 is engaging Microbiologists to contribute their scientific expertise to a unique ... Document experimental findings and processes with a focus on clarity for AI training data.

Delivery Lead

Austin, TX · Remote

$110K - $140K/yr

San Francisco, CA About the Role HumanSignal specializes in operationally complex, multimodal data collection and annotation -- delivering the datasets that frontier AI research requires and remote ...

Showing results 41-60

Hourly Remote Data Annotation information

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as an hourly remote data annotation specialist?

To excel as an Hourly Remote Data Annotation Specialist, you need strong attention to detail, accuracy, and familiarity with data labeling concepts, often supported by a high school diploma or equivalent. Proficiency with annotation platforms, labeling tools (like Labelbox or Supervisely), and sometimes basic knowledge of spreadsheets or image/video editing software is typically required. Reliability, time management, and clear communication are vital soft skills for succeeding in a remote, deadline-driven environment. These abilities ensure high-quality, consistent annotations that are critical for training AI models and meeting project requirements.

What are some common challenges faced by hourly remote data annotation workers and how can they be addressed?

Hourly remote data annotation workers often encounter challenges such as repetitive tasks, maintaining high accuracy, and managing time effectively without direct supervision. To address these, it's important to establish a structured daily routine, take regular breaks to prevent fatigue, and utilize any quality control guidelines provided by the employer. Staying in regular communication with team leads or project managers can also help clarify any ambiguities and ensure consistent work quality.

What is the difference between Hourly Remote Data Annotation vs Hourly Remote Data Labeling?

AspectHourly Remote Data AnnotationHourly Remote Data Labeling
CredentialsBasic computer skills, attention to detailBasic computer skills, attention to detail
Work EnvironmentRemote, flexible hoursRemote, flexible hours
Industry UsageCommon in AI/ML projects for training dataCommon in AI/ML projects for training data
Job FocusAdding annotations to data (e.g., bounding boxes, tags)Assigning labels to datasets for model training

Both roles involve working remotely to prepare data for machine learning models. Data annotation typically involves marking specific features within data, while data labeling involves categorizing data into predefined classes. The skills and work environment are similar, making them closely related but distinct tasks within AI data preparation.

What is hourly remote data annotation?

Hourly remote data annotation involves labeling or categorizing data, such as images, text, or audio, for use in machine learning and artificial intelligence projects. Annotators work from home and are usually paid by the hour to review and tag data according to specific guidelines provided by the employer. This work is essential for training algorithms to recognize patterns or interpret information accurately. Data annotation tasks vary and can include image classification, text categorization, or identifying objects within media. It’s a popular entry-level remote job that requires attention to detail and the ability to follow instructions closely.
What are the most commonly searched types of Remote Data Annotation jobs in Austin, TX? The most popular types of Remote Data Annotation jobs in Austin, TX are:
What are popular job titles related to Hourly Remote Data Annotation jobs in Austin, TX? For Hourly Remote Data Annotation jobs in Austin, TX, the most frequently searched job titles are:
What job categories do people searching Hourly Remote Data Annotation jobs in Austin, TX look for? The top searched job categories for Hourly Remote Data Annotation jobs in Austin, TX are:
What cities near Austin, TX are hiring for Hourly Remote Data Annotation jobs? Cities near Austin, TX with the most Hourly Remote Data Annotation job openings:
Infographic showing various Hourly Remote Data Annotation job openings in Austin, TX as of August 2026, with employment types broken down into 1% As Needed, 82% Full Time, 13% Part Time, and 4% Contract. Highlights an 87% Physical, 3% Hybrid, and 10% Remote job distribution.

Applied Data Scientist, LLM Evaluation

Driver AI Inc.

Austin, TX • On-site, Remote

$175K - $275K/yr

Full-time

Medical, Dental, Vision, Life, Retirement

Re-posted 15 days ago


Job description

Applied Data Scientist, LLM Evaluation
Introduction
At Driver, we're building systems that turn source code into human language. The tech stack includes a core compiler-like engine, a heavily asynchronous/distributed backend server, and a frontend web application that provides a rich user experience.
About Driver
We're an early-stage startup backed by Y Combinator and Google Ventures that combines first principles technical approaches and applied LLM expertise to tackle context engineering at scale. Driver builds the context layer for employees and AI agents alike to use in developing software.
Working at Driver
Driver is an early-stage but fast-growing startup. As such, we take advantage of that which startups can excel: delivery speed, flexibility, and enjoying working with a small close-knit team.
Organizational and engineering values at Driver include first-principles thinking, correct by construction, writing things down, experimentation and iteration, pragmatism, commitment to effective communication and transparency, autonomy, and ambition.
Job Overview
Title: Applied Data Scientist, LLM Evaluation
Location: Remote or Austin, Tx
Our value is directly tied to the quality of our content at scale. The platform generates technical documentation across a complex, multi-stage pipeline - producing multiple content types at different levels of abstraction, from individual code elements up to high-level summaries. Today, changes to models, context strategies, or pipeline architecture are evaluated largely through manual review and intuition. There is no systematic way to answer: "Did this change make our output better, worse, or the same - and for which languages, repo sizes, and content types?"
This is a hard problem. LLM outputs are non-deterministic - identical inputs produce different outputs across runs, and small variations at early pipeline stages compound into meaningfully different end-user content downstream. Evaluating quality requires methodology that accounts for this: statistical reasoning over multiple runs, understanding of cascade effects through the pipeline, and rubrics that balance human judgment with automated signals.
This role builds the evaluation function from scratch. You'll define what "good" means for our generated content, build the infrastructure to measure it, and create the experimental framework that lets the team ship changes with confidence.
What You'll Do
You'll own the LLM evaluation strategy at Driver - from first principles to production infrastructure. This is a foundational role: you're not joining an existing eval team, you're building it. As the function matures, you'll seed and grow a team around it.
Define quality metrics and build evaluation datasets. Establish what "good" looks like for each content type across the pipeline. Build and curate gold-standard evaluation datasets across languages and repo archetypes (monorepos, microservices, libraries, applications). Design rubrics that capture accuracy, completeness, usefulness, and readability.
Build benchmarking and experimentation infrastructure. Create automated evaluation pipelines that score output against reference datasets. Instrument the content generation pipeline to support A/B comparisons - run the same codebase through two strategies and compare results. Build tooling for LLM-as-judge evaluation and regression detection. Integrate evaluation into CI so pipeline changes come with quality evidence.
Develop automated quality signals at scale. Build quality checks that flag degraded output without requiring human review of every document. Monitor content quality trends over time. Design sampling strategies for human review that maximize signal with minimal annotation effort.
Quantify tradeoffs and inform decisions. Run experiments on model selection, context strategies, and pipeline architecture changes. Quantify cost/quality/latency tradeoffs. Partner with the engineering team to turn evaluation insights into shipped improvements.
Qualifications
Education: Bachelor's, Master's, or PhD in Statistics, Machine Learning, Data Science, Computational Linguistics, or a related quantitative field.
Experience: Minimum 3 - 5 years in applied science, ML engineering, or data science roles with a focus on evaluation, NLP, or generative AI. 7+ years experience preferred.
Required Technical Skills
  • Strong statistical foundations: experimental design, hypothesis testing, confidence intervals, effect sizes, power analysis.
  • Experience designing and running evaluations for LLM or NLP systems - you've thought carefully about what "better" means when outputs are open-ended text.
  • Proficient in Python and the scientific/data stack (pandas, NumPy, scipy, sklearn).
  • Comfortable working in Jupyter notebooks for exploration and prototyping, and turning that work into automated pipelines.
  • Experience with LLM-as-judge approaches, inter-annotator agreement, and rubric design for subjective quality assessment.
  • Familiarity with the practical challenges of non-deterministic systems: variance decomposition, multi-run methodology, distinguishing signal from noise at scale.
  • Strong data storytelling - you can turn experiment results into clear recommendations that drive engineering and product decisions.

Preferred and Nice-to-Have Technical Skills
  • Experience with LLM APIs and prompt engineering across multiple providers.
  • Familiarity with evaluation frameworks (e.g., RAGAS, DeepEval, custom harnesses).
  • Experience building data pipelines or ETL workflows (Airflow, Dagster, or similar).
  • Comfort with SQL and working directly against production data stores.
  • Experience with visualization tools (Matplotlib, Plotly, Streamlit) for building internal dashboards and reports.
  • Background in code understanding, developer tools, or technical documentation.
  • Experience building or managing annotation pipelines and human evaluation workflows.
Benefits
  • Competitive Compensation Packages - Cash & Equity
  • Flexible Work Culture
  • Unlimited Time Off + 12 Paid Company Holidays
  • Insurance - Health, Dental, & Vision
  • Life Insurance & FSA Accounts
  • 401(k) Retirement Accounts - Traditional, Roth, or Both
  • Quarterly Team Offsites

Driver is an equal opportunity employer. We celebrate diversity and are committed to creating an inclusive environment for all employees. We do not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, color, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, age, marital status, veteran status, or disability status.