2

Director Remote Utilization Review Jobs in Racine, WI

Remote micro1 is engaging Regulatory Affairs Specialists to contribute to a customer's project ... Author and review evaluation tasks inspired by real-world agency requests and sponsor response ...

Remote Job Summary: You'll use your tax expertise to help train next-generation AI systems. The ... Direct experience reviewing or validating AI or technology-driven tax content. * Background in ...

Remote Job Summary: You'll use your tax expertise to help train next-generation AI systems. The ... Direct experience reviewing or validating AI or technology-driven tax content. * Background in ...

Remote Job Summary: You'll use your tax expertise to help train next-generation AI systems. The ... Direct experience reviewing or validating AI or technology-driven tax content. * Background in ...

Remote Job Summary: You'll use your tax expertise to help train next-generation AI systems. The ... Direct experience reviewing or validating AI or technology-driven tax content. * Background in ...

100% remote | W2 employment | $40 - $54/hour | Flexible Scheduling (It is required to hold a state ... Covers both direct sessions and documentation time. ⭐ Schedule and flexibility: Design your own ...

Remote micro1 is engaging Medical Writers / Clinical Document Authors to participate in a customer ... Author and review realistic evaluation tasks based on Clinical Study Reports, DSURs, PSURs/PBRERs ...

Remote micro1 is engaging Medical Writers / Clinical Document Authors to participate in a customer ... Author and review realistic evaluation tasks based on Clinical Study Reports, DSURs, PSURs/PBRERs ...

Remote micro1 is engaging Medical Writers / Clinical Document Authors to participate in a customer ... Author and review realistic evaluation tasks based on Clinical Study Reports, DSURs, PSURs/PBRERs ...

Showing results 41-60

Director Remote Utilization Review information

See Racine, WI salary details

$20

$39

$64

How much do director remote utilization review jobs pay per hour?

As of Aug 22, 2026, the average hourly pay for director remote utilization review in Racine, WI is $39.65, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $31.35 and $45.53 per hour, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What is a director of remote utilization review?

A Director of Remote Utilization Review is a healthcare leader responsible for overseeing teams that assess the necessity, appropriateness, and efficiency of medical services, typically from a remote or virtual environment. This role ensures compliance with regulatory guidelines, optimizes resource use, and helps manage healthcare costs while maintaining quality patient care. Directors collaborate with physicians, nurses, and insurance providers to review clinical cases and develop utilization review strategies. They also monitor performance metrics and implement process improvements for remote teams.

How does a director of remote utilization review typically collaborate with clinical and administrative teams to ensure effective patient care management?

A Director of Remote Utilization Review plays a pivotal role in bridging clinical staff, case managers, and administrative teams to optimize patient care and resource utilization. This is often achieved through regular virtual meetings, data sharing, and cross-departmental strategy sessions to review utilization trends and address barriers to care. The director ensures that remote teams adhere to regulatory standards and organizational goals, fostering open communication to streamline workflows and resolve complex cases efficiently. Successful collaboration enhances patient outcomes, reduces unnecessary costs, and maintains compliance, all while supporting a positive remote team environment.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as a director of remote utilization review, and why are they important?

To thrive as a Director of Remote Utilization Review, you need in-depth knowledge of healthcare regulations, utilization management processes, and a relevant clinical background, typically supported by an RN or other clinical licensure and experience in case management. Familiarity with utilization review software, electronic health records (EHR), and certifications such as CCM or UM are often required. Leadership, analytical thinking, and strong communication skills are vital for guiding teams and collaborating with stakeholders. These skills ensure effective oversight of remote teams, regulatory compliance, and optimal patient care outcomes.

What is the difference between Director Remote Utilization Review vs Utilization Review Nurse?

AspectDirector Remote Utilization ReviewUtilization Review Nurse
CredentialsTypically requires a nursing license, advanced degree, and management experienceRegistered Nurse (RN) license, relevant clinical experience
Work EnvironmentOversees teams remotely, strategic planning, policy developmentConducts patient reviews, collaborates with healthcare providers, often remote or onsite
Employer & Industry UsageHealth insurance companies, managed care organizationsHospitals, insurance companies, healthcare facilities

The main difference is that the Director Remote Utilization Review focuses on managing teams and policies remotely, while the Utilization Review Nurse performs clinical reviews directly related to patient care. The director has a broader strategic role, whereas the nurse role is more clinical and operational.

Regulatory Affairs Specialist

micro1 AI

Milwaukee, WI • Remote

$50 - $70/hr

Part-time

Posted 18 days ago


Job description

Role Title: Regulatory Affairs Specialist


Role Type: Contractor


Location: Remote


micro1 is engaging Regulatory Affairs Specialists to contribute to a customer's project focused on AI innovation in regulatory documentation. In this role, you'll apply your expertise to help train next-generation AI systems. Your work will shape how models learn, reason, and perform through high-quality, real-world input. No prior experience in AI is required — your domain knowledge is what matters.


Scope of Work

  1. Author and review evaluation tasks inspired by real-world agency requests and sponsor response threads, determining if drafted responses meet regulatory expectations.
  2. Apply expert judgment to review clinical documentation, assessing whether conclusions are substantiated, commitments are properly scoped, and records can withstand regulatory scrutiny.
  3. Distinguish between substantively adequate and superficially polished responses, articulating clear rationales for any deficiencies.
  4. Assess consistency across comprehensive document sets, identifying unsupported or conflicting claims within or between documents.
  5. Provide structured, well-reasoned written feedback grounded in applicable regulatory guidelines rather than subjective impressions.
  6. Collaborate asynchronously and communicate complex regulatory concepts clearly in both written and verbal form.


Preferred Qualifications

  1. 5+ years of direct regulatory affairs experience at a sponsor, CRO, or consultancy, with responsibility for clinical submissions.
  2. Documented experience drafting or leading responses to health authority information requests, particularly for ongoing regulatory filings.
  3. Demonstrated working knowledge of the ICH framework, CTD/eCTD structure, and practical expectations of at least one major regulatory body (FDA, EMA, MHRA, PMDA, or Health Canada).
  4. Proven ability to critically read clinical or safety documents to identify regulatory risks, unsupported statements, and potential reviewer concerns.
  5. Exceptional written communication skills, with the capability to convey regulatory reasoning clearly, concisely, and defensibly.
  6. Degree in life sciences, pharmacy, medicine, or a related field; RAC certification is an advantage.
  7. Experience engaging with multiple regions or agencies, prior health authority reviewer/assessor background, or familiarity with AI-assisted regulatory tools (all considered valuable).