1

Cto Software Engineer Jobs in Atlanta, GA (NOW HIRING)

Sr. Director, Software Engineering

Atlanta, GA · On-site

$240K/yr

Flexi Software is hiring a Sr. Director, Software Engineering to stand up and lead a second ... Reporting to the CTO, you will hire, set its technical direction, and ship modern, web-based ...

Sr. Director, Software Engineering

Atlanta, GA · On-site

$243K/yr

Reporting to the CTO, you will hire, set its technical direction, and ship modern, web-based ... Bachelor's degree in software engineering, computer science, or a related technical field - or ...

Full Stack Developer

Atlanta, GA · On-site +1

$80K - $100K/yr

... CTO Responsibilities: * 90% frontend engineering, 10% backend engineering (no heavy lifting ... software engineering * 2+ years of experience with TypeScript, React, HTML, CSS * Backend ...

Engineering Manager

Atlanta, GA · On-site

$150K - $170K/yr

Technology Delivery Reports To: CTO Employment Status: Full-Time FLSA Status: Exempt Effective Date ... software engineering experience , including current or very recent production code * Prior ...

Reporting to the Chief Technology Officer, this role owns all technology that drives consumer ... The role combines deep engineering, architecture, and commercial expertise to create industry ...

Registered Cardiovascular Invasive Specialist (RCIS) certified. * Assist in procedures such as complex PCI including CTO * Assist with complex procedures; including multiple wire exchanges and able ...

next page

Showing results 1-20

Cto Software Engineer information

See Atlanta, GA salary details

$61.1K

$141.9K

$197.6K

How much do cto software engineer jobs pay per year?

As of Sep 12, 2026, the average yearly pay for cto software engineer in Atlanta, GA is $141,867.00, according to ZipRecruiter salary data. Most workers in this role earn between $115,400.00 and $166,400.00 per year, depending on experience, location, and employer.

What is a CTO software engineer?

CTO Software Engineers are technology leaders who combine deep technical expertise with executive-level responsibilities. They typically oversee the engineering team, define the company’s technology strategy, and ensure that software development aligns with business goals. As Chief Technology Officers, they are responsible for making high-level decisions about architecture, tools, and innovation while also mentoring engineers and sometimes contributing to code. Their role bridges the gap between company leadership and technical execution. This position requires both strong management skills and hands-on development experience.

How does a CTO software engineer balance hands-on technical work with high-level strategic responsibilities?

As a CTO Software Engineer, you'll often need to split your time between coding, overseeing software architecture, and guiding the overall technology vision of the company. This means managing a team of engineers, making key technical decisions, and collaborating with other executive leaders to ensure technology aligns with business goals. While you may still participate in code reviews and critical development tasks, much of your focus will shift to mentoring, setting technical standards, and long-term planning. Balancing these aspects requires strong communication, delegation skills, and the ability to prioritize both immediate engineering needs and future growth.

What are the key skills and qualifications needed to thrive as a CTO software engineer, and why are they important?

To thrive as a CTO Software Engineer, you need deep expertise in software development, system architecture, and leadership, typically backed by an advanced degree in computer science or engineering. Familiarity with cloud platforms, DevOps tools, programming frameworks, and experience overseeing large-scale technology projects are often required, along with certifications like AWS Certified Solutions Architect or PMP. Strategic vision, communication, and team management are crucial soft skills that set successful CTOs apart. These competencies ensure the effective alignment of technology with business goals, driving innovation and organizational growth.

What is the difference between Cto Software Engineer vs Software Developer?

AspectCto Software EngineerSoftware Developer
CredentialsBachelor's or higher in CS, relevant certificationsBachelor's in CS or related field, certifications optional
Work EnvironmentCollaborates with executive teams, involved in strategic planningFocuses on coding, testing, and implementing software solutions
Employer & Industry UsageUsed in tech companies, startups, and enterprises for leadership rolesCommon across all industries, entry to mid-level roles
Comparison IntentUnderstanding leadership vs technical rolesUnderstanding development tasks and skills

The Cto Software Engineer typically combines technical expertise with strategic leadership, often working closely with executive teams. In contrast, a Software Developer primarily focuses on coding and developing software solutions. While both roles require similar technical credentials, the Cto Software Engineer has additional responsibilities related to project management and strategic planning, making it a more senior and leadership-oriented position.

Director, PEPI - Technology Services CTO Domain

Atlanta, GA • On-site

Alvarez & Marsal
Business Management Consulting • 5 - 10K employees

Full-time

Re-posted 3 days ago


Key responsibilities

  • Own the full engagement lifecycle including scoping, workplanning, team management, and financial delivery.

  • Serve as the primary point of contact for portfolio company CTOs, VPs of Engineering, and PE deal partners.

  • Lead cross-functional teams and drive AI strategy, diligence, and value creation initiatives within engineering and product organizations.


Alvarez & Marsal rating

7.2

Company rating: 7.2 out of 10

Based on 7 frontline employees who took The Breakroom Quiz


Job description

Description
About Alvarez & Marsal
Alvarez & Marsal (A&M) is a global consulting firm with over 10,000 entrepreneurial, action and results-oriented professionals in over 40 countries. We take a hands-on approach to solving our clients' problems and assisting them in reaching their potential. Our culture celebrates independent thinkers and doers who positively impact our clients and shape our industry. The collaborative environment and engaging work-guided by A&M's core values of Integrity, Quality, Objectivity, Fun, Personal Reward, and Inclusive Diversity-are why our people love working at A&M.
A&M's Private Equity Performance Improvement Services (PEPI) practice focuses on serving upper middle market and large cap private equity firms who have engaged A&M to help improve operating results at their portfolio companies ($50M-$1B+ revenue range).
Our PEPI services include:
  • IT / Product / Engineering [Technology Services]
  • CDD/Strategy
  • Interim Management
  • Merger Integration & Carve-outs
  • Rapid Results
  • Supply Chain
  • CFO Services
Technology Services - CTO Domain
The Technology Services team works directly with private equity firms and their portfolio companies to drive measurable value through applied AI. Within the CTO Domain, our engagements target the software engineering, product development, and technical delivery organizations of portfolio companies-helping them embed AI across the SDLC, DevOps pipeline, and product lifecycle to increase engineering throughput, reduce R&D cost, and accelerate time-to-market. Specific focus areas include:
  • AI-native SDLC transformation: embedding agentic AI coding tools and assistants across requirements, design, code generation, code review, testing, and release management
  • Engineering productivity measurement and uplift: DORA metrics improvement, developer capacity modeling, and AI tooling ROI quantification
  • DevOps and CI/CD pipeline modernization incorporating AI-driven automation, intelligent testing, and deployment orchestration
  • MLOps and AI model lifecycle management: model versioning, CI/CD for ML, monitoring, drift detection, and responsible AI guardrails
  • Platform engineering: AI-accessible developer platforms, self-service internal tooling, and Backstage-based developer portals with AI integrations
  • Technical debt assessment and architecture modernization to enable AI-ready, cloud-native engineering environments
  • AI-enabled product roadmap acceleration: using AI to shorten development cycles, increase feature velocity, and reduce cost per feature delivered
  • End-to-end transformation execution, governance, and value tracking tied to engineering financial targets
We align AI initiatives with investment theses, financial targets, and operational realities to ensure durable impact.
Role Overview
As a Director in the PEPI Technology Services AI team [CTO Domain], you will independently lead AI-driven value creation engagements across the private equity lifecycle, with a specific focus on the software engineering, product development, and technical delivery organizations of PE-backed portfolio companies. You own scope, workplan, client relationships, and financial outcomes end-to-end.
This role requires a practitioner who has operated inside or directly alongside engineering and product organizations-someone who has personally led SDLC transformations, managed engineering teams, governed AI coding tool rollouts, or run DevOps programs at scale-and who can translate that hands-on operating experience into rapid, credible impact within the compressed timelines of a PE holding period.
How You Will Contribute
Engagement Leadership & Client Ownership
  • Own the full engagement lifecycle: scoping, workplanning, team management, executive communications, and financial delivery against defined engineering performance targets
  • Serve as primary point of contact for portfolio company CTOs, VPs of Engineering, and PE deal partners
  • Lead cross-functional engagement teams spanning software engineering, product management, DevOps, platform engineering, and data/ML
  • Drive executive-level workshops and steering committee presentations; translate engineering findings into financial narratives for PE audiences (R&D cost reduction, developer capacity uplift, time-to-market acceleration)
AI Strategy, Diligence & Value Creation
  • Identify and prioritize AI use cases within the engineering and product organization mapped directly to EBITDA improvement, R&D cost reduction, and product growth
  • Lead AI-focused diligence workstreams: assess engineering organization AI maturity, SDLC efficiency, AI tooling adoption, DevOps posture, technical debt, and developer productivity to size value potential
  • Develop AI-native engineering operating models and SDLC transformation roadmaps with specific financial targets and DORA metric milestones
  • Quantify the financial value of AI-enabled engineering productivity: cost per feature, developer capacity freed, cycle time reduction, and deployment frequency uplift
Transformation Execution & Governance
  • Establish program governance, KPI frameworks, and value tracking tied to engineering metrics: DORA four key metrics, SPACE framework, AI tooling adoption rate, and engineering cost per feature
  • Manage vendor relationships, AI tooling providers, and platform implementation partners across timelines, budgets, and execution risks
  • Redesign core SDLC and DevOps processes to embed AI across the full engineering lifecycle: agentic code generation, automated PR review, AI-driven QA, intelligent deployment gates, and AI-augmented incident response
  • Align engineering organizational structures and talent models to support AI-augmented development at scale
Practice Contribution
  • Support business development: contribute to proposals, respond to PE firm RFPs, and participate in client pitches
  • Mentor Senior Associates and Analysts; contribute to A&M's Technology Services team methodology, tools, and accelerators for CTO domain engagements
Required Skills & Technology Fluency
Directors are expected to have led or governed implementations using the technologies below-not merely advised on them. Candidates should be able to speak to specific engineering programs they have run, financial outcomes they delivered, and technical decisions they owned.
AI Strategy & Governance within the Engineering Organization
  • Design and operationalize AI governance frameworks for engineering organizations: AI acceptable use policies for code generation, AI-generated code review standards, license compliance for AI-suggested code, and security risk management for AI-authored software
  • Define and implement AI tooling adoption programs at scale: GitHub Copilot enterprise rollout (seat governance, usage analytics, ROI tracking), Cursor team deployments, Claude Code integration into CI/CD pipelines, and developer enablement programs
  • Build AI tooling ROI models: baseline developer productivity (DORA metrics, cycle time, story point velocity), measure AI-driven uplift, and translate into EBITDA-relevant engineering cost reduction narratives for PE audiences
  • Conduct engineering AI maturity assessments: evaluate SDLC toolchain AI-readiness, DevOps automation depth, test coverage and quality gates, technical debt profile, and developer experience (DX) metrics
  • Navigate AI code security risks: SAST/DAST for AI-generated code, software bill of materials (SBOM) requirements, supply chain security, and AI-specific code vulnerability patterns
AI Coding Tools & Agentic Software Development
  • Lead enterprise deployments of AI coding tools: GitHub Copilot (Agent Mode, Copilot Coding Agent, multi-model selection), Cursor (rules configuration, codebase indexing, team policies), Claude Code (MCP server integration, agent workflows), Amazon Q Developer, or Codeium
  • Evaluate and govern autonomous coding agents in enterprise SDLC contexts: Devin, OpenAI Codex CLI, Google Antigravity-including quality gates, human-in-the-loop checkpoints, and guardrails against AI slop and hallucinated dependencies
  • Configure and govern AI code review platforms: CodeRabbit (organization-wide rules, PR summary policies), Qodo/CodiumAI (multi-agent review architecture, test generation), GitHub Copilot Code Review-including integration with existing code quality workflows
  • Design prompt engineering standards for development teams: system prompt libraries, context injection patterns, retrieval-augmented code generation (using LangChain, LlamaIndex, or LangGraph), and codebase-aware LLM workflows
  • Measure and manage AI coding tool economics: token cost governance, premium request budgets (GitHub Copilot billing mechanics), developer adoption rates, and quality metrics (AI bug rate, rework time, hallucination frequency)
DevOps, CI/CD & Platform Engineering
  • Design and govern AI-augmented CI/CD pipelines: GitHub Actions (including Copilot Coding Agent PR automation), GitLab CI/CD, Azure DevOps Pipelines-with AI-driven intelligent test selection, automated deployment gates, and self-healing pipeline logic
  • Lead platform engineering programs: internal developer platforms (IDPs) built on Backstage with AI plugin integrations, self-service infrastructure provisioning, golden path templates, and AI-accessible service catalogs (natural language queries via LLMs)
  • Architect containerization and orchestration at scale: Kubernetes (EKS, AKS, GKE), Helm chart governance, service mesh (Istio, Linkerd), and operator patterns for AI workload deployment
  • Implement Infrastructure as Code governance programs: Terraform module libraries with AI-assisted generation (GitHub Copilot for IaC, Pulumi AI), Ansible playbooks, policy-as-code (OPA/Conftest, Checkov), and drift detection
  • Measure and improve engineering velocity: DORA four key metrics (deployment frequency, lead time for change, MTTR, change failure rate), SPACE framework, developer satisfaction surveys, and AI uplift quantification using LinearB, Jellyfish, Waydev, or Swarmia
MLOps & AI Model Lifecycle Management
  • Design and govern end-to-end MLOps platforms: MLflow (experiment tracking, model registry, serving), Kubeflow Pipelines, AWS SageMaker Pipelines, Azure ML (including Prompt Flow for LLM ops), Vertex AI Pipelines, or Weights & Biases (W&B)
  • Implement CI/CD for ML: automated model training triggers, hyperparameter tuning pipelines, model evaluation gates, staging/canary deployment patterns, and champion-challenger frameworks
  • Govern LLMOps at enterprise scale: RAG pipeline architecture and optimization (chunking strategies, embedding models, vector database selection-Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, pgvector), prompt versioning, evaluation frameworks (RAGAS, LangSmith, Phoenix), and inference cost governance
  • Implement production AI monitoring: model drift detection, data distribution shift alerting, prediction quality monitoring, and responsible AI dashboards (fairness metrics, explainability outputs, bias detection)
  • Design data pipelines for ML feature engineering: Apache Spark, dbt, Airflow, Prefect-and architect feature stores (Feast, Tecton, Databricks Feature Store) that support both batch and real-time model serving
Cloud & Engineering Infrastructure
  • Architect cloud-native engineering environments for AI-intensive workloads: GPU/accelerator compute (AWS P/Trn instances, Azure NDv5/NCv3, GCP A100/H100), spot/preemptible instance strategies, and multi-region inference serving architectures
  • Implement observability stacks for engineering performance: Datadog APM, Dynatrace full-stack, Grafana/Prometheus (including AI-assisted alert definition), PagerDuty AIOps-with SLO/SLA tracking and AI-augmented incident response
  • Govern DevSecOps programs: SAST (Semgrep, Checkmarx, SonarQube), DAST (OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite), container security (Trivy, Snyk, Aqua), and AI-generated code risk scanning pipelines integrated into CI/CD
  • Lead engineering cloud cost governance: FinOps practices, rightsizing AI compute, reserved instance strategies, and engineering cost per feature modeling tied to PE value creation targets
Product & Engineering Economics
  • Build engineering unit economics models for PE audiences: fully-loaded cost per feature, R&D cost as % of revenue, AI-driven capacity creation, developer FTE equivalent savings, and time-to-market acceleration
  • Design and run AI-assisted product development programs: AI-augmented backlog refinement (LLM-based story generation and acceptance criteria drafting), AI-driven roadmap prioritization, and sprint velocity improvement using AI coding tools
  • Lead technical due diligence: assess SDLC maturity, code quality (static analysis outputs, test coverage, cyclomatic complexity), architecture scalability, security posture, and AI tooling readiness as inputs to investment thesis and value creation plan
  • Align engineering operating models to PE value creation: headcount optimization through AI productivity gains, offshore/nearshore engineering leverage, outsourced vs. in-house AI tooling decisions, and exit readiness preparation
Qualifications
  • 8-12+ years in software engineering leadership, technical consulting, product development, or engineering transformation-with a meaningful portion in hands-on operator or senior practitioner roles, not exclusively advisory
  • Demonstrated track record of leading complex, multi-workstream engineering transformation programs with measurable financial outcomes-R&D cost reductions, EBITDA improvements, or engineering productivity gains delivered and realized
  • Tangible operating experience within or directly alongside engineering organizations: has personally managed engineering teams, governed SDLC programs, led DevOps transformations, rolled out AI coding tooling at scale, or owned technical delivery accountability-not just advised on them
  • Experience working with private equity firms or PE-backed portfolio companies, particularly software or technology-enabled businesses, with understanding of deal timelines, value creation plans, and exit preparation
  • Proven ability to manage senior client relationships at the CTO, CPO, or CEO level

What Alvarez & Marsal employees say

Pay

Hours and flexibility

Workplace

Get the full story on Breakroom